Use of Agriculture Byproduct and Swamp Grass as Matterial for Ammoniation of Total Mixed Fiber in Ration on Ballinese Cattle Performance

A. Imsya; Muhakka Muhakka; F. Yossi

doi:10.24014/jupet.v18i2.12688

Use of Agriculture Byproduct and Swamp Grass as Matterial for Ammoniation of Total Mixed Fiber in Ration on Ballinese Cattle Performance

A. Imsya, Muhakka Muhakka, F. Yossi

Abstract

ABSTRACT. This study was design to evaluated about the using of total mixed fiber ammoniation (TMFA) in ration on Ballinese beef performance. This study used an experimental method with Completely Randomized Design (CRD) consisting of 4 types of treatmentt ration based on TMFA usage level and 3 replications. The treatmentts were R1 = 60% native grass (Control), R2 = 20% TMFA + 40% native grass, R3 = 40% TMFA + 20% native grass, R4 = 60% TMFA. The ration is added with a 40% concentrate to obtain 100% ration. The comparison between forage and concentrate is 60:40. Parameters measured in vivo are performance (ration intake, dry matter intake, crude protein intake, daily body weight gain and ration efficiency). The results showed that treatmentt significantly influenced (P <0.05) on ration intake, dry matter intake, daily body weight gain and ration efficiency, but the treatmentt unsignificantly influenced (P>0.05) on crude protein intake. It can be concluded that the use of 60% TMF ammoniation in the ration shows the best result, that is ration intake 6.89 kg/head/day, dry matter intake 6.25 kg / head / day, daily weight gain 0.47 kg / head / day and efficiency of ration 7.42%.

Pemanfaatan Hasil Samping Pertanian dan Rumput Rawa sebagai Bahan Amoniasi Total Mixed Fiber (TMF) dalam Ransum Terhadap Performa Sapi Bali

ABSTRAK. Penelitian ini mengevaluasi pemanfaatan amoniasi Total Mixed Fiber (TMFA) dalam ransum terhadap performa sapi Bali. Penelitian menggunakan Rancangan Acak Lengkap (RAL) dengan 4 perlakuan dan 3 ulangan. Perlakuan terdiri dari R1= 60% rumput Raja (control), R2 = 20% TMFA + 40% rumput Raja, R3 = 40% TMFA + 20% Rumput Raja, R4 = 60% TMFA. Ransum ditambah 40% konsentrat untuk memperoleh 100% ransum. Perbandingan hijauan dan konsentrat adalah 60:40. Parameter yang diukur adalah konsumsi ransum, konsumsi bahan kering, konsumsi protein kasar, pertambahan bobot badan dan efisiensi ransum. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa perlakuan memberikan pengaruh yang nyata (P<0.05) terhadap konsumsi ransum, konsumsi bahan kering, pertambahan bobot badan dan efisiensi ransum, namun perlakuan tidak memberi pengaruh yang nyata (P>0.05) terhadap konsumsi protein. Kesimpulan dari penelitian adalah pemakaian amoniasi TMF 60% dalam ransum memberikan hasil terbaik dengan konsumsi ransum 6.89kg/ekor/hari, konsumsi bahan kering 6.25/kg/ekor/hari, pertambahan berat badan 0.47kg/ekor/hari dan efisiensi ransum 7.42%.

Keywords

Beef production, ammoniation, total mixed fiber, technology, swamp grass, byproduct

Full Text:

PDF

References

Abate, D., and S, Melaku. 2009. Effect of supplementing urea-treated barley straw with lucerne or vetch hays on feed intake, digestibility and growth of Arsi Bale sheep. Tropical Animal Health Production. 41:579-586.

Adejoro, F. A., and A, Hassen. 2017. Effect of supplementing or treating Eragrostis curvula hay with urea or nitrate on its digestibility and in vitro fermentation. S. Afr. J. Anim. Sci. 47: 168-177.

Association of Official Agricultural Chemists. 1995. Official method of analysis. 16th ed. Animal Feeds: Association of Official Analytical Chemists, VA, USA.

Aufrère, J., Dudilieu, M., Andueza, D., Poncet, C., Baumont, R. 2013. Mixing sainfoin and lucerne to improve the feed value of legumes fed to sheep by the effect of condensed tannins. Animal. 7: 82–92.

Capper, J.L. 2012. Is the grass always greener? Comparing the environmental impact ofbconventional, natural and grass-fed beef production systems. Animals. 2: 127–143.

Fang, J., M. Matsuzaki, H. Suzuki, Y. Cai, K. I. Horiguchi and T. Takahashi. 2012. Effects of lactic acid bacteria and urea treatmentt on fermentation quality, digestibility and ruminal fermentation of roll bale rice straw silage in wethers. Grassland Sci. 58:73-78.

Gunun P, Wanapat M, Nantasook, A, N. 2013. Effect of physical form and urea treatmentt of rice straw on rumen fermentation, microbial protein synthetis and nutrient digestibility in dairy steer. Asian Australian Journal Animal Science. 26(12):1689-1697.

Hossain, M, M, Khan M, J, Akbar MA. 2010. Nutrient digestibility and growth of local bull calves as affected by feeding urea and urease enzyme sources treated rice straw. Bang J Anim Sci. 39: 97–105.

Hafid, H., and N, Rugayah. 2010. Pengukuran sapi Bali dan ransum baku local. Prosiding seminar nasional teknologi peternakan dan Veteriner. Bogor

Hristov, A.N., Ott, T., Tricarico, J., Rotz, A.,Waghorn, G., Adesogan, A., Dijkstra, J.,Montes, F.,Oh, J., Kebreab, E., Oosting, S.J., Gerber, P.J., Henderson, B., Makkar, H.P.S., Firkins, J.L. 2013. Special topics -mitigation ofmethane and nitrous oxide emissions fromanimal operations: III. A review of animal management miti.

Huyen N T, M Wanapat and C Navanukraw. 2012. Effect of mulberry leaf pellet (MUP) supplementation on rumen fermentation and nutrient digestibility in beef cattle fed on rice straw-based diets. Animal Feed Science Technology. 175:8-15.

Jaglan, B, S., and N, Kishore. 2005. Compaction behavior of urea treated crop residues in feed blocks. Indian Journal Animal Nutrition. 22:90-93.

Khejornsart P, Wanapat M. 2010. Effect of chemical treatment of rice straw on rumen fermentation characteristic, anaerobic fungal diversity in vitro. J Anim Vet Adv. 9: 3070–3076.

Imsya A., Muhakka, dan Yosi ,F. 2016. Use of swamp 430 grass and agricultural waste as materials for total mixed fiber (TMF) in rations and its effect on methane gas production and production efficiency of beef cattle, Pakistan Journal of Nutrition. 15(4):342–346.

Maneerat W, Prasanpanich S, Kongmun S, Sinsmut W and Tumwasorn S. 2013. Effect of Feeding Total Mixed Fiber on Feed Intake and Milk Production in Mid Lactating Dairy Cows. Kasetsart Journal (Natural Science). 47:571–580.

McDonald, P R A Edwards, J F D Green Halgh and C A Organ. 2012. Animal Nutrition. 6th Ed. Scientific and Technikal Co. Pubhlished. In The United State With John and Sons. Inc.New York . p :78-80.

Nguyen V, N, M, Wanapat, Khejornsart, and P Kongmun. 2012. Nutrient digestibility and ruminal fermentation characteristic in swamp buffaloes fed on chemically treated rice straw and urea. Tropical Animal Health Production. 44:629-636.

Nurdiati, K., EcHandayanta, Lutojo. 2012. Efficiency of beef cattle production in the dry season at the people's farms in the dry land farming area of Gunung Kidul Regency. Tropical Animal Husbandry. 1(1):52-58.

Pond, W, G., D, C, Church, K, R, Pond, and P, A, Schoknecht. 2005. Basic Animal Nutrition and Feeding. Fifth Ed. John Wiley and Sons, Inc. United States. 91-109.

Sebastian L, A, C., Karen A. Beauchemin D, Jennifer MacAdam B, Juan J. Villalba A. 2020. Grazing diverse combinations of tanniferous and non-tanniferous legumes: Implications for beef cattle performance and environmental impact. Science of the total environmental. 746:140-788.

Siregar, S. 2001. Ruminant Animal Ration. Penebar Swadaya, Jakarta.

Steel R, G, D., and J, H, Torrie. 2002. Principles and Procedures of Statistics: A Biometrical Approach. Second Edition. McGraw-Hill Book Company, London. 633 p.

Vlaming J, B. 2008. Quantifying Variation in Estimated Methane Emission from Ruminants Using the SF6 Tracer Fechnique. A Thesis of Doctor of Phylosophy in Animal Science. Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.

Wanapat, M. 2009. Rumen manipulation to increase the efficient use of local feed resources and productivity of ruminants in the tropics. Asian-Australian Journal Animal Science. 26:529-536.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24014/jupet.v18i2.12688