The Effect of Directed Reading Thinking Activity (DRTA) Method on Students’ Reading Comprehension for State Islamic Senior High School

Abdullah Hasan

Abstract


This study aims to find out the effect of using Directed Reading Thinking Activity (DRTA) Method on students’ reading comprehension. A quasi-experimental design was used with pre-test and post-test non-equivalent control group design. The number of participants was 63 students divided into an experimental group (31) and a control group (32) of the students of MAN 1 Pekanbaru. Two research questions and four hypotheses were posed  in this study.  Before conducting the treatment, pretest  was administered, and posttest was administered after the treatment. Independent and dependent (paired) sample t-tests were used to analyze the data. The research finding showed  a  significant  effect  of  using  Directed  Reading  Thinking  Activity  (DRTA) method on students’ reading comprehension. Using DRTA method contributed 72% on students’ reading comprehension, meanwhile the control group using non-DRA method contributed 49%. At last, it can be inferred that DRTA method is suitable to apply in teaching  reading  comprehension  at  State  Islamic  Senior  High  School  (MAN)  1 Pekanbaru.

Keywords


Directed Reading Thinking Activity (DRTA) method; teaching reading; reading comprehension; narrative texts

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdullah Hasan, , Rizky Gushendra and Ferry Yonantha .2017. The Influence of Prior Knowledge on Students’ Listening and Reading Comprehension. Indonesian Journal of English Education (IJEE), 4 (1), 2017, 1-15

Badan Standar Nasional Pendidikan. 2006. Standar Isi untuk Satuan Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah, Jakarta: BSNP.

Brown, H. D. 2001. Teaching by principles, An interactive approach to language pedagogy. San Fransisco: Longman.

Cohen, A.D. 1998. Strategies in Learning and Using as Second Language. New York: Addison Wesley Longman.

Crawford, Alan, Saul. E. Wendy, Samuel Mathews & James Maxinster. 2005. Teaching and Learning Strategies for the Thinking Classroom. The International Debate Education Association, New York NY 10019.

Fries, C. 2008. Teaching and learning english as a foreign language. Michigan: University of Michigan Press.

Gay, L. R., & Airisian, P. 2003.Educational Research Competencies for Analysis and Application. 7th ed. New Jersey: Prentice hall.

Harmer, Jeremy.1998.How to Teach English. England: Longman.

Haris, Karen R, and Steve Graham.1997.Teaching Reading Comprehension to Students with Learning Difficulties. New York: The Guilford Press.

NCLCR (The National Capital Language Resource Center). 2003. Teaching Reading: Goals and Technique for Teaching Reading. Washington DC.

Nunan, David. (2003). Dynamic Text Comprehension An Integrative View of Reading. New York: Phoenix ELT.

Rohaty, M. Majzub, Zarina Othman & Abdullah Hasan. 2012. The Effects of ACEJ Language Learning Strategies Toward Students’ English Language Achievement. Research Journal of Applied Sciences 7 (8), 421-425.

Wooley, G. 2011. Reading Comprehension: Assisting Children With Learning Activities. Sringer Science Media. B.V.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


J/E/A/L/T   ISSN 2407-0998 (Print) | ISSN 2407-1005 (Online)

Pusat Pengembangan Bahasa UIN Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau
JL. KH. Ahmad Dahlan No. 94 Pekanbaru
28128 PO BOX 1004
HP. 0852-4896-2008 Fax. (0761) 858832 Telp 0761-562223

Email : jealt@pusat-bahasa.info

Creative Commons License
Journal of English and Arabic Language Teaching is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at http://ejournal.uin-suska.ac.id/index.php/jealt.

Flag Counter