Examining Semitic Rhetoric: A Qur’anic Sciences Perspective

Aqdi Rofiq Asnawi; Idri Idri

doi:10.24014/jush.v28i2.9898

Examining Semitic Rhetoric: A Qur’anic Sciences Perspective

Aqdi Rofiq Asnawi, Idri Idri

Abstract

In his study of Qur’anic structure, Michel Cuypers applied Semitic Rhetoric that has been used to analyze Biblical structure. Despite having received positive responses from Gabriel Said Reynolds and others, Cuypers’ method was criticized by Nicolai Sinai for ignoring rhyme in the Qur’an and overdoing in maintaining the existence of the ring structure in the Qur’an. This paper, then, attempts to examine this analytic method from the perspective of the Qur’anic sciences’ (‘ulu>m al-Qur’a>n). This study aims to determine proportionally the characteristics of the method and the effect it produces by using descriptive-analytic and comparative research methods. This paper argues that there are subjectivity and inconsistency in dividing the text and determining the structure of its composition, as in the study of surah al-Qa>ri‘ah by Cuypers, and an ignorance of the information about reasons for the revelations (asba>b al-nuzu>l) and Prophet’s explanation about verses. However, the application of this method can lead to a new interpretation of the Qur’an, namely by using the information in the Qur’an itself, indicators of wording around it (siya>q), and verse correlation (muna>saba>t). On the other hand, this method supports the authenticity and coherence of the Qur’anic text, which has become a debate among the Orientalists.

Keywords

Semitic Rhetoric; Michel Cuypers; Qur’anic structure

Full Text:

PDF

References

‘Abbas, Fad}l H{asan. I‘ja>z al-Qur’a>n al-Kari>m. Amman: Da>r al-Nafa>is, 2015>.

“Michel Cuypers, P.F.J.” https://www.ideo-cairo.org/en/michel-cuypers-p-f-j-2/. Internet. Accessed on 24 February 2020.

Asnawi, Aqdi Rofiq. “Penerapan Semitic Rhetoric Analysis (SRA) pada Surah al-Qiya>mah,” Mutawatir: Jurnal Keilmuan Tafsir Hadith 8, No. 1 (2018), 143-169.

Attallah, Halla. “Michel Cuypers, The Composition of the Qur’an: Rhetorical Analysis, translated by Jerry Ryan. London / New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 2015.” Der Islam 95, No. 1 (2018): 211-217.

Bell, Richard. The Qur’a>n: Translated, with a critical re-arrangement of the Surahs. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1939.

Biqa>‘i>, Ibra>him bin ‘Umar. Naz}mu al-Durar fi> Tana>subi al-A>ya>t wa al-Suwar. Kairo: Da>r al-Kutub al-Isla>mi>, n. d.

Boisliveau, Anne-Sylvie. “Reviewed Work: Le Festin: Une lecture de la sourate al-Mâ'ida by Michel Cuypers”. Journal of Qur’anic Studies 9, No. 1 (2007): 119-23.

Cuypers, Michel. “Semitic Rhetoric as a Key to the Question of the Naz}m of the Qur’anic Text”. Journal of Qur’anic Studies 13, No. 1 (2011): 1-24.

_______. Fi> Naz}mi al-Qur’a>n. Transleted from English, The Composition of the Qur’an: Rhetorical Analysis, by ‘Adna>n al-Muqra>ni> dan T{a>riq Manzu>. Beirut: Da>r al-Masyriq, 2018.

_______. Fi> Naz}mi Su>rati al-Ma>’idah: Naz}mu An fi> D{aw’i Manhaji al-Tah}li>l al-Bala>ghi>. . Transleted from English, The Banquet: A reading of the fifth Sura of the Qur’an, by ‘Amr Abd al-‘A S{a>lih}. Beirut: Da>r al-Masyriq, 2016.

Douglas, Mary. Thinking in Circles: An Essay on Ring Composition. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 2007.

Farrin, Raymond. Structure and Qur’anic Interpretation: A Study of Symmetry and Coherence in Islam’s Holy Text. Ashland, Oregon: White Cloud Press, 2014.

H{awwa>, Sa‘i>d. Al-Asa>s fi> al-Tafsi>r. Kairo: Da>r al-Sala>m, 1424.

H{usayn, Muh}ammad. al-Mustasyriqu>n wa al-Dira>sa>t al-Qur’a>niyyah. Beirut: Da>r al-Muarrikh al-‘Arabiy, 1999.

Ibn ‘A>syu>r. Al-Tah}ri>r wa al-Tanwi>r. Tunis: al-Da>r al-Tu>nisiyyah li al-Nasyr, 1984.

Idri. Hadis dan Orientalis. Depok: Kencana, 2017.

Izutsu, Toshihiko. God and Man in the Qur’an: Semantics of the Qur’anic Weltanschauung. Petaling Jaya: Islamic Book Trust, 2008.

al-Khat}t}a>bi>. Baya>n I‘ja>z al-Qur’a>n. Kairo: Da>r al-Ma‘a>rif, 1976.

Meynet, Roland. Rhetorical Analysis: An Introduction to Biblical Rhetoric (Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1998.

_______. Treatise on Biblical Rhetoric. Transl. Leo Arnold. Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2012.

Mir, Mustansir. Coherence in the Qur’a>n. A Study of Isla>hi>’s Concept of Naz}m in Taddabur-i Qur’a>n. Indianapolis: American Trust Publications, 1986.

Mokrani, Adnane. “Semitic Rhetoric and the Qur’ān: The Scholarship of Michel Cuypers.” In New Trends in Qur’ anic Studies: Text, Context, and Interpretation. Ed. Mun’im Sirry. Atlanta, Georgia: Lockwood Press, 2019.

al-Mujawwad, Muhammad Yaslam. "Manhaj al-Bala>ghah al-Sa>miyah fi Dira>sah Bunyat al-Qur’a>n al-Kari>m," https://tafsir.net/research/41/mnhj-al-blaght-as-samy-yt-fy-drast-bnyt-al-qr-aan-al-krym-drast-wsfyt-nqdyh. Internet. Accessed on 24 February 2020.

Nasir, M. Ridlwan. Perspektif Baru Metode Tafsir Muqarin dalam Memahami al-Qur’an. Surabaya: Imtiyaz, 2011.

Netton, Ian Richard. “Towards a Modern Tafsir of Surah al-Kahf: Structure and Semiotics.” Journal of Qur’anic Studies 2, No. 1 (2000): 67-87.

al-Qat}t}a>n, Manna>’. Maba>h}ithun fi> ‘Ulu>m al-Qur’a>n. Kairo: Maktabatu Wahbah, n. d..

al-Ra>zi>, Fakhr al-Di>n. Mafa>ti>h al-Ghayb. Beirut: Da>r Ih}ya>’ al-Tura>th al-‘Arabi>, 1420.

Reynolds, Gabriel Said. “Buchbesprechungen.” Der Islam 88, No. 2 (2012): 427–434.

Robinson, Neal. Discovering the Qur’an: A Contemporary Approach to a Veiled Text. London: SCM Press, 1996.

Rodwell, J. M.. The Koran. New York: Dover Publication, 2005.

Saleh, Walid. “The Etymological Fallacy and Qur’anic Studies: Muhammad, Paradise, and Late Antiquity.” In The Qur’an in Context. Ed. Angelika Neuwirth, Nicolai Sinai, Michael Marx. Leiden: Brill, 2010.

Shihab, M.Quraish. Kaidah Tafsir. Tangerang: Lentera Hati, 2015.

Sinai, Nicolai. “Review Essay: ‘Going Round in Circles’: Michel Cuypers, The Composition of the Qur’an: Rhetorical Analysis, and Raymond Farrin, Structure and Qur’anic Interpretation: A Study of Symmetry and Coherence in Islam’s Holy Text”. Journal of Qur’anic Studies19, No. 2 (1 Juni 2017): 106-122.

al-Suyu>t}i>, ‘Abd al-Rah}ma>n. Al-Itqa>n Fi> ‘Ulu>m al-Qur’a>n. Mesir: al-Hay’ah al-al-Mishriyyah ‘Ammah Li al-Kita>b, 1974.

Tilawati, Anis. “Struktur Cincin Dalam al-Qur’an (Perspektif Orientalis-Nicolai Sinai)”. Nun: Jurnal Studi al-Qur’an dan Tafsir di Nusantara 4, No. 2 (2018): 51-77.

Wolfensohn, Israel. Ta>rikh al-Lugha>t al-Sa>miyyah. Beirut: Da>r al-Qalam, 2016.

Zahniser, Matthias. “Major Transitions and Thematic Borders in Two Long Sūras: Al-Baqara and al-Nisa’.” In Literary Structures of Religious Meaning.Ed. Issa Boullata. Richmond: Curzon Press, 2000.

al-Zarkasyi>, Badr al-Di>n. Al-Burha>n fi> ‘Ulu>m al-Qur’a>n. Beirut: Da>r al-Ma‘rifah, 1957.

al-Zurqa>ni>, Muh}ammad. Mana>hil al-‘Irfa>n Fi> ‘Ulu>m al-Qur’a>n. Aleppo: Mat}ba‘ah ‘I al-Ba>bi, n.d.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24014/jush.v28i2.9898