Efek Dosis Probiotik Konsorsium pada Kualitas Organoleptik Daging Broiler

Malikil Kudus Susalam, Yetti Marlida, Heppy Setya Prima, Fadhli Fajri, Fajri Maulana

Abstract


ABSTRAK. Probiotik konsorsium merupakan kombinasi dari berbagai mikroorganisme yang saling bekerja sehingga menghasilkan manfaat yang lebih baik dibandingkan probiotik tunggal. Tujuan penelitian adalah untuk mendapatkan dosis pemberian probiotik konsorsium yang terbaik dilihat dari uji organoleptik daging broiler meliputi tekstur, rasa, warna dan aroma. Penelitian menggunakan ayam broiler yang dipelihara selama 35 hari dengan pemberian level probiotik konsorsium berbeda dalam air minum. Pakan yang digunakan adalah BR 1 Wonokoyo. P0 = pemberian level 0 ml probiotik konsorsium, P1 = pemberian level 0,5 ml probiotik konsorsium, P2 = pemberian level 1 ml probiotik konsorsium dan P3 = pemberian level 1,5 ml probiotik konsorsium dengan 5 kali pengulangan. Parameter yang diamati adalah tekstur, rasa, warna dan aroma daging. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan pemberian probiotik konsorsium pada ayam broiler memberikan pengaruh berbeda sangat nyata (P<0,01) terhadap tekstur daging, rasa daging, warna daging dan aroma daging. Hasil penelitian ini disimpulkan pemberian level 1 ml probiotik konsorsium pada ayam broiler diperoleh tekstur daging 4,40; rasa daging 4,31; warna daging 3,82 dan aroma daging 4,14.

Kata kunci: Probiotik, konsorsium, tekstur, rasa, warna

The Effect of Probiotic Consortium Dosage on the Organoleptic Quality of Broiler Meat

ABSTRACT. Consortium probiotics are a combination of various microorganisms that work together to produce better benefits than single probioticsThis research aimed to obtain the best dose of probiotic consortium based on organoleptic tests of broiler meat, including texture, taste, color, and aroma. This study used broiler chickens that were reared for 35 days by administering different levels of probiotic consortium in drinking water. The feed used is BR 1 Wonokoyo. P0 = Giving probiotic consortium level 0 ml, P1 = Giving probiotic consortium level 0.5 ml, P2 = Giving probiotic consortium level 1 ml, and P3 = Giving probiotic consortium level 1.5 ml with 5 times covered. The parameters observed were texture, taste, color, and aroma of meat. The results of this study showed that giving a probiotic consortium to broiler chickens had a very significantly different effect (P<0.01) on meat texture, meat taste, meat color, and meat aroma. From the results of this study, it was concluded that by administering 1 ml of the probiotic consortium to broiler chickens, the meat texture was 4.40, the meat taste was 4.31, the meat color was 3.82, and the meat aroma was 4.14.


Keywords


Probiotics, consortium, texture, taste, color

Full Text:

PDF

References


Atapattu, N, & L. M. S. Silva. 2016. Effects of gradual feed dilution with inert or less nutritive materials on growth performance, feed cost and meat organoleptic properties of broiler chicken. Brazilian J. Poultry Sci. 18:427–434.

Bournay, M, & J. Gouteron. 2016. Influence of aroma on the perception of food quality: A study of consumer preferences. Food Quality and Preference. 48(A):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2015.08.004

Burgain, J, & J. Scher. 2019. Probiotics and their effects on Human health: Mechanisms and benefits. Critical Rev. Food Sci. Nutrition. 59(10):1579-1593. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2018.1496199

Elshaghabee, F. M. F., N. Rokana., R. D. Gulhane., C. Sharma, & H. Panwar. 2017. Bacillus as potential probiotics: Status, concerns, and future perspectives. Frontiers Microbiol. 10(8):1490.

Firnanda, Y. A., Ibrahim, & D. Anindyasari. 2023. Analisis preferensi konsumen terhadap pembelian daging sapi di Perumahan Bumi Sambutan Asri Kota Samarinda. Jurnal Peternakan Lingkungan Tropis. 6(1):44-53. https://ejournals.unmul.ac.id/index.php/ptk/index

Hafid, H., A. Napirah, & A. Efendi. 2020. Organoleptic characteristics of chicken meatballs that using gelatin as a gelling agent. in IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. IOP Publishing, p. 12013.

Hartanti, D., M. Z. U. Haqqi, & A. Hamad. 2018. Potency of combination of essential oils of ginger and lemongrass as fresh chicken meat natural preservative. Adv. Sci. Letters. 24(1):91-94.

Hussein, E. & S. Selim. 2018. Efficacy of yeast and multi-strain probiotic alone or in combination on growth performance, carcass traits, blood biochemical constituents, and meat quality of broiler chickens. Livestock Sci. 216:153-159.

Ibrahim, H. M., A. M. Salem, & M. S. Shanab. 2014 Quality evaluation of some locally manufactured chicken meat products. Benha Vet. Med. J. 26(2):143–149.

Izzah, A. N., W. Nurtiana., M. A. Ningrum., S. Anggraeni., I. Nugroho., A. S. Hasanah., R. A. Alfidah, & R. Febriyani. 2024. Pengaruh perlakuan daging sapi pada suhu berbeda terhadap perubahan mioglobin: Review Singkat. J. Tropical Food Agroindustrial Technol. 5(1):1-8.

Jannah, D. R. 2022. Preferensi konsumen terhadap karkas ayam broiler segar dan beku di Kecamatan Tenggarong. Jurnal Peternakan Lingkungan Tropis. 5(1):28-35.

Jiang, Z, & H. Xie. 2015. A review on the impact of cooking methods on meat flavor. Food Sci. Human Wellness. 4(2):65-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fshw.2015.02.002

Jiang, S., F. Yan., J. Hu, & A. Mohammed. 2021. The impact of dietary probiotics on broiler performance and meat quality: A meta-analysis. Anim. Nutrition. 7(2):404-412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2020.11.001

Khan, S., R. J. Moore., D. Stanley, & K. K. Chousalkar. 2020. The gut microbiota of laying hens and its manipulation with prebiotics and probiotics to enhance gut health and food safety. Applied Environ. Microbiol. 86(13):e00600-20. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00600-20

Konieczka, P., M. Czauderna., A. J. Rozbicka-Wieczorek., S. Smulikowska, & J. Czerwiński. 2018. The effect of dietary Lactobacillus spp. on performance, microbiota composition, and intestinal morphology in broiler chickens. Poultry Sci. 97(3):940–949.

Malik, A. A., A. Aremu., G. B. Bayode, & B. A. Ibrahim. 2011. A nutritional and organoleptic assessment of the meat of the giant African land snail (Archachatina marginata Swainson) compared to the meat of other livestock. Livestock Res. Rural Development. 23(3).

Pangestu, M. R., C. A. Fitri, & S. Wajizah. 2016. Nilai organoleptik daging ayam broiler dengan penambahan prebiotik immuno Forter pada berbagai level berbeda. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Pertanian. 1(1): 731–738.

Semjon, B., A. Bórsos., I. Kocsis., J. Csapó, & M. Székely. 2020. Multiple factorial analysis of physicochemical and organoleptic properties of breast and thigh meat of broilers fed a diet supplemented with humic substances. Poultry Sci. 99(3):1750–1760. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pez614

Sihombing, V. E., I. B. N. Swacita, & I. K. Suada. 2020. Perbandingan uji subjektif kualitas daging sapi bali produksi Rumah Pemotongan Hewan Gianyar, Klungkung dan Karangasem. Indonesia Medicus Veterinus. 9(1):99-106. https://doi.org/10.19087/imv.2020.9.1.99

Sinaga, M. O. A., N. L. P. Sriyani, & I. G. Suarta. 2021. Kualitas organoleptik daging sapi Bali yang dilayukan dengan lama waktu yang berbeda. Majalah Ilmiah Peternakan. 24(2):77-81.

Solehah, M., R. R. Riyanti., V. Wanniatie, & D. Septinova. 2022. Pengaruh pemberian Lactobacillus acidophilus terhadap pH dan keempukan daging ayam broiler. Jurnal Riset dan Industri Peternakan. 8(2):263-270.

Steel, R. G. D, & J. H. Torrie. 1995. Prinsip dan prosedur statistik suatu pendekatan biometrik cetakan ke-4. (Diterjemahkan oleh Sumantri, B). PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama. Jakarta.

Toba, R. D. S., H. Hafid, & M. A. Pagala. 2018. Kualitas organoleptik daging sapi yang diberi pasta lengkuas (Alpinia galanga L.) dengan lama simpan yang berbeda. Jurnal Ilmu dan Teknologi Peternakan Tropis. 5(1) 26–35.

Tovar-Ramírez, D., M. A. Mazorra-Manzano., J. C. Ramírez-Suárez, & A. F. González-Córdova. 2022. Probiotic yeast: Advantages of Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a probiotic in animal nutrition. Microorganisms. 10(3):610.

Usman. 2022. Karakteristik organoleptik daging sapi dengan pemberian minyak cengkeh. Jurnal Agrokompleks Tolis. 2(2):31-35.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24014/jupet.v22i2.33056

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Jurnal Peternakan has been accredited by Sinta 3 : Number 158/E/KPT/2021

Starting from Vol. 18 No. 1 Year 2021 to Vol. 22 No. 2 Year 2025

 

Jurnal Peternakan Indexed By:

          
 

Editorial Office:

Jurnal Peternakan

Faculty of Agriculture and Animal Science, State Islamic University of Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau.

H.R. Soebrantas street KM. 15,5 Panam – Pekanbaru city.

E-mail: jurnal.peternakan@uin-suska.ac.id

ejournal: http://ejournal.uin-suska.ac.id/index.php/peternakan

e-ISSN: 2355-9470   p-ISSN: 1829-8729

Lisensi Creative Commons
Creation is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. View Mystats