Perceptions and Influential Factors of Beef Consumers During Foot and Mouth Disease in West Sulawesi Province
Abstract
ABSTRACT. This study aims to determine the response of customer perceptions and factors that influence consumer decisions to buy and consume beef during the foot and mouth disease epidemic that affected cattle in 2022. The variables used in this study consist of several aspects that are thought to influence consumer perceptions, such as product aspects, nutrition and health aspects, knowledge aspects, and product handling aspects, as well as sociodemographic conditions of housewife such as education level, employment status, and location of the area of household, which are used as variables to determine consumer determinants, and 100 housewife data was collected as a sample for this research. The study's findings revealed a significant relationship between housewife education and consumers' perceptions of meat consumption during the FMD pandemics, but no significant correlation between housewife occupations (P>0.005) or household location (P>0.005). During FMD pandemics, housewife education has the most influential factor (P<0.005) on consumer perceptions of beef consumption.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Akaichi, F., K. Glenk, & C. R. Giha. 2019. Could animal welfare claims and nutritional information boost the demand for organic meat? evidence from non-hypothetical experimental auctions. Journal of Cleaner Production 207:961–70. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.064.
Badan Pusat Statistik Provinsi Sulawesi Barat. Jumlah Rumah Tangga di Provinsi Sulawesi 2015-2022.
Badan Pusat Statistik. Berita Resmi Statistik No. 84/11/Th. XXV, 15 November 2022 tentang Indeks Pembangunan Manusia (IPM) Tahun 2022.
Ermanda, A. P., Jafrinur, & J. Hellyward. 2020. Influential factors of animal food consumption in West Sumatera Province [Application of almost ideal demand system model]. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 497(1). doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/497/1/012052.
Ermanda, A. P., Jafrinur, & J. Hellyward. 2019. Pola konsumsi pangan hewani pada rumahtangga di Propinsi Sumatera Barat (Penerapan model almost ideal demand system).” Jurnal Peternakan Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Animal Science) 21(3):220. doi: 10.25077/jpi.21.3.220-229.2019.
Fathurrohman, R. A. N, & D. S. K. Dewi. 2023. Dinamika kebijakan pemerintah Indonesia dalam menangani endemi penyakit mulut dan kuku (PMK) di tahun 2022. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik (JISIP) 12(3):317–27. doi: 10.33366/jisip.v12i3.2670.
Govindaraj., B. G. Kumar., A. Krishnamohan., R. Hegde., N. Kumar., K. Prabhakaran., V. M. Wadhwan., N. Kakker., T. Lokhande., K. Sharma., A. Kanani., Limaye., K. Natchimuthu K., P. N. Ananth., A. K. De., T. A. Khan., J. Misri., B. B. Dash., B. Pattnaik, & R. Habibur. 2021. Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD) incidence in cattle and buffaloes and its associated farm-level economic costs in endemic India. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 190(August 2020):105318. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2021.105318.
García-T. S., A. L. Gajardo, & F. J. Mesías. 2016. Intensive vs. free-range organic beef. a preference study through consumer liking and conjoint analysis. Meat Science 114:114–20. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2015.12.019.
Kerth, C. R., A. L. Harbison., S. B. Smith, & R. K. Miller. 2015. Consumer sensory evaluation, fatty acid composition, and shelf-life of ground beef with subcutaneous fat trimmings from different carcass locations. Meat Science 104:30–36. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2015.01.014.
Li, X., K. L. Jensen., C. D. Clark, & D. M. Lambert. 2016. Consumer willingness to pay for beef grown using climate friendly production practices. Food Policy 64:93–106. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2016.09.003.
Nugroho, E. J, & L. Simamora. 2021. Faktor – faktor yang mempengaruhi keputusan pembelian daging sapi di pasar raya I Salatiga. Ziraa’Ah Majalah Ilmiah Pertanian. 46(2):134. doi: 10.31602/zmip.v46i2.4528.
Ogundijo, D. A., A. A. Tas, & B. A. Onarinde. 2022. “Age, an important sociodemographic determinant of factors influencing consumers’ food choices and purchasing habits: An English University Setting.” Frontiers in Nutrition 9(May):1–10. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.858593.
Rombach, M., D. Dean., F. Vriesekoop., W. de Koning., L. K. Aguiar., M. Anderson., P. Mongondry., M. O. Gyamfi., B. Urbano., C. A. G. Luciano., W. Hao., E. Eastwick., Z. V. Jiang, & A. Boereboom. 2022. Is cultured meat a promising consumer alternative? exploring key factors determining consumer’s willingness to try, buy and pay a premium for cultured meat. Appetite 179. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2022.106307.
Rusdiana. S, Ismail., R. Sulaiman., Amiruddin., R. Daud., Zainuddin, & M. Sabri. 2018. The Effort of Beef Needs Supplying for Coming Years in Indonesia. Int. J. Trop. Vet. Biomed. Res. 3(1): 48-59;
Teixeira, A, & S. Rodrigues. 2021. Consumer perceptions towards healthier meat products. Current Opinion in Food Science. 38:147–54. doi: 10.1016/j.cofs.2020.12.004.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24014/jupet.v21i2.29617
Refbacks
Jurnal Peternakan has been accredited by Sinta 3 : Number 158/E/KPT/2021
Starting from Vol. 18 No. 1 Year 2021 to Vol. 22 No. 2 Year 2025
Jurnal Peternakan Indexed By:
Editorial Office:
Jurnal Peternakan
Faculty of Agriculture and Animal Science, State Islamic University of Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau.
H.R. Soebrantas street KM. 15,5 Panam – Pekanbaru city.
E-mail: jurnal.peternakan@uin-suska.ac.id
ejournal: http://ejournal.uin-suska.ac.id/index.php/peternakan
Creation is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. View Mystats