Evaluasi Usaha Ternak Ayam Broiler Sistem Kemitraan Inti Plasma Berbasis Index Performance (IP)
Abstract
ABSTRAK. Penelitian bertujuan untuk mengevaluasi usaha ternak ayam broiler sistem kemitraan inti plasma berbasis Index Performance (IP). Penelitian dilakukan dengan pendekatan desk research dan deskriptif analitis. Data primer didapat dari wawancara mendalam (in depth interview) kepada peternak selaku pihak plasma dan perusahaan peternakan selaku pihak inti atau pemilik modal. Wawancara dilakukan secara bersama dengan kedua belah pihak, pihak inti dan pihak plasma dengan tujuan untuk menguak data, fakta, dan realita sistem kemitraan inti plasma ayam broiler. Data sekunder diperoleh dari data kontrak kemitraan, hasil pencatatan pemeliharaan ayam broiler (recording) selama masa produksi, dan Rekapitulasi Hasil Pemeliharaan Peternak (RHPP) pada populasi 2.000 ekor. Hasil penelitian didapatkan bahwa usaha ternak ayam broiler dengan sistem inti plasma menghabiskan biaya sapronak sebesar 67.733.672,00 dengan ketentuan biaya DOC sebesar 20,66%, biaya pakan sebesar 77,64%, dan biaya OVK sebesar 2,93%. Penjualan ayam yang didapat mencapai 75.268.878,50 dengan umur panen 35,00 hari dengan berat rata-rata 2,12 kg. Jumlah ayam yang dipanen sebanyak 1.927 ekor, artinya level deplesi hanya 3,65%. Nilai FCR 1,615 dengan nilai IP sebesar 361,43. Kesimpulan yang didapat yaitu secara keseluruhan pemeliharaan ayam broiler yang dilakukan oleh peternak plasma berada dalam kategori sangat baik. Pendapatan peternak plasma sebesar 11.665.363,00 (setelah ditambah bonus harga pasar, bonus FCR, dan bonus deplesi).
Kata kunci: ayam pedaging, indeks performa, peternakan, sistem kemitraan, inti plasma.
Evaluation of Broiler Chicken Livestock with the Core Plasma Partnership System Based on Index Performance (IP)
ABSTRACT. The aim of this study was to evaluate broiler farming in a plasma core partnership system based on Index Performance (IP). The research was conducted using a desk research and analytical descriptive approach. Primary data was obtained from in-depth interviews with farmers as plasma parties and livestock companies as main parties or owners of capital. Interviews were conducted jointly with both parties, the core party and the plasma party with the aim of uncovering data, facts, and the reality of the broiler plasma core partnership system. Secondary data was obtained from partnership contract data, the results of recording broiler chicken maintenance (recording) during the production period, and Breeder Maintenance Results Recapitulation (RHPP) in a population of 2,000 birds. The results showed that the broiler farming business with the plasma core system with input cost 67,733,672.00 with the provisions that the DOC cost was 20.66%, the feed cost was 77.64%, and the OVK cost was 2.93%. Sales of chickens reached 75,268,878.50 with a harvest age of 35.00 days with an average weight of 2.12 kg. The number of chickens harvested was 1,927, meaning the depletion level was only 3.65%. FCR value of 1.615 with an IP value of 361.43. The conclusion obtained is that overall the maintenance of broiler chickens carried out by plasma farmers is in the very good category. Plasma farmer income of 11,665,363.00 (after adding market price bonuses, FCR bonuses and depletion bonuses).
Keywords
Full Text:
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)References
Amam, A. (2022). Sebuah evaluasi keberhasilan usaha ternak broiler sistem kemitraan inti plasma. Jurnal Pangan, 31(3), 259–270. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33964/jp.v31i3.608
Amam, A., Asepriyadi, A., Ridhillah, M. F., & Rusdiana, S. (2023). Beef cattle farming with a shepherd system in Indonesia. E3S Web of Conferences, 01002(373), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202337301002
Amam, A., Fanani, Z., Hartono, B., & Nugroho, B. A. (2019a). Broiler livestock business based on partnership cooperation in indonesia: The assessment of opportunities and business developments. International Journal of Entrepreneurship, 23(1 Special Issue), 1–11.
Amam, A., Fanani, Z., Hartono, B., & Nugroho, B. A. (2019b). Identification of resources in the system of broiler farming business. Jurnal Ilmu Ternak Dan Veteriner, 24(3), 135–142. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.14334/jitv.v24.3.1927
Amam, A., Fanani, Z., Hartono, B., & Nugroho, B. A. (2019c). Identifikasi sumber daya finansial, teknologi, fisik, ekonomi, lingkungan, dan sosial pada usaha ternak ayam pedaging. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Teknologi Peternakan Dan Veteriner, 738–746. https://doi.org/10.14334/pros.semnas.tpv-2019-p.738-746
Amam, A., Fanani, Z., Hartono, B., & Nugroho, B. A. (2019d). Pengembangan usaha ternak ayam pedaging sistem kemitraan bagi hasil berdasarkan aksesibilitas peternak terhadap sumber daya. Jurnal Ilmu Dan Teknologi Peternakan Tropis, 6(2), 146–153. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.33772/jitro.v6i2.5578
Amam, A., Fanani, Z., Hartono, B., & Nugroho, B. A. (2019e). Usaha ternak ayam pedaging sistem kemitraan pola dagang umum: Pemetaan sumber daya dan model pengembangan. Sains Peternakan, 17(2), 5. https://doi.org/10.20961/sainspet.v17i2.26892
Amam, A., Fanani, Z., Hartono, B., & Nugroho, B. A. (2019f). The power of resources in independent livestock farming business in Malang District, Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 372(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/372/1/012055
Amam, A., Fanani, Z., & Nugroho, B. A. (2016). Analisis sikap konsumen terhadap susu bubuk berkalsium tinggi dengan menggunakan multi-atribut model dan norma subyektif model. Wacana, Jurnal Sosial Dan Humaniora, 19(01), 12–21. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.wacana.2016.019.01.2
Amam, A., & Harsita, P. A. (2017). Mengkaji kepuasan dan loyalitas konsumen susu bubuk tinggi kalsium dengan pendekatan multi-atribut. JSEP (Journal of Social and Agricultural Economics), 10(3), 16. https://doi.org/10.19184/jsep.v10i3.5680
Amam, A., & Harsita, P. A. (2019). Tiga pilar usaha ternak: Breeding, feeding, and management. Jurnal Sains Peternakan Indonesia, 14(4), 431–439. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31186/jspi.id.14.4.431-439
Amam, A., Jadmiko, M. W., Harsita, P. A., & Poerwoko, M. S. (2019). Model pengembangan usaha ternak sapi perah berdasarkan faktor aksesibilitas sumber daya. Jurnal Sain Peternakan Indonesia, 14(1), 61–69. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31186/jspi.id.14.1.61-69
Amam, A., Jadmiko, M. W., Harsita, P. A., Widodo, N., & Poerwoko, M. S. (2019). Sumber daya internal peternak sapi perah dan pengaruhnya terhadap dinamika kelompok dan konteks kerentanan. Jurnal Ilmiah Peternakan Terpadu, 7(21), 192–200. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.23960/jipt.v7i1.p192-200
Amam, A., Jadmiko, M. W., Harsita, P. A., Zahrosa, D. B., & Rusdiana, S. (2021). Development of smallholders beef cattle farming: Support resources. International Seminar on Livestock Production and Veterinary Technology, 367–382.
Amam, A., Jadmiko, M. W., Harsita, P. A., Zahroza, D. B., & Rusdiana, S. (2021). Inhibiting factors on the sustainable livestock development: Case of dairy cattle in Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 892, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/892/1/012040
Amam, A., Nasution, I. W., Susanto, A., Yulianto, R., Purnawan, A. B., Nasution, N. H., Prihatin, K. W., Solikin, N., Susanto, E., Imanudin, O., & Irfan, M. (2023). Pengantar Ilmu Peternakan. Edupedia.
Amam, A., Rusdiana, S., Maplani, M., Talib, C., & Adiati, U. (2023). Integration of sheep and corn in rural agriculture in Indonesia. E3S Web of Conferences, 01001(373), 1–10. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202337301001
Amam, A., & Soetriono, S. (2022). Refleksi Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 6 Tahun 2013 terhadap pembangunan peternakan berkelanjutan: Pemberdayaan peternak sapi potong. Jurnal Pangan, 31(1), 55–68. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33964/jp.v31i1.557
Cepriadi, C., Maharani, E., & Maureen, N. (2010). Analisis perbandingan pola kerjasama kemitraan peternak ayam broiler di Kota Pekanbaru (Studi kasus PT. Ramah Tamah Indah). Jurnal Peternakan, 7(1), 20–28.
Firmansyah, F. B., Amam, A., Rusdiana, S., & Huda, A. S. (2022). Peranan sumber daya terhadap pengembangan usaha kemitraan domba. Jurnal Manajemen Agribisnis, 10(2), 862–870. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24843/JMA.2022.v10.i02.p11
Harsita, P. A., & Amam, A. (2019). Analisis sikap konsumen terhadap produk olahan singkong. Agrisocionomics: Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Dan Kebijakan Pertanian, 3(1), 19–27. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14710/agrisocionomics.v3i1.2469
Harsita, P. A., & Amam, A. (2021). Gaduhan: Sistem kemitraan usaha peternakan sapi potong rakyat di Pulau Jawa. Jurnal Peternakan Sriwijaya, 10(1), 16–28. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.33230/JPS.10.1.2021.13030
Harsita, P. A., Setyawan, H. B., & Amam, A. (2022). Analisis mutu produk naget substitusi hati ayam Kampung Unggul Balitbangtan (KUB). Bulleting of Applied Animal Reserach, 4(1), 35–40. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.36423/baar.v4i1.941
Ramadhan, B. K. B., Amam, A., Romadhona, S., & Rusdiana, S. (2022). Pengembangan usaha ternak sapi potong rakyat berbasis sumber daya. Wahana Peternakan, 6(2), 54–61. https://doi.org/10.37090/jwputb.v6i2.552
Rokhani, R., Amam, A., Jadmiko, M. W., & Yusantoro, D. (2023). Farmer empowerment in One Thousand Cattle Village Program: Reflection on Government Regulation Number 6 of 2023 on sustainable livestock development. Advances in Animal and Veterinary Sciences, 11(11), 1790–1800. https://doi.org/https://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.aavs/2023/11.11.1790.1800
Rusdiana, S., Adiati, U., Hafid, A., Talib, C., & Amam, A. (2022). Manajemen strategis usaha peternakan melalui metode force field analysis dan rekomendasi kebijakan. Jurnal Ilmu Dan Teknologi Peternakan Tropis, 9(1), 264–272. https://doi.org/10.33772/jitro.v9i1.18583
Rusdiana, S., Talib, C., Praharani, L., Herdiawan, I., & Amam, A. (2023). Financial feasibility of sheep business through improvement of farmer business scale. AIP, 100010(January), 1–6. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1063/5.0124013 © 2023 Author(s). 2583,
Soejono, D., Soetriono, S., Zahrosa, D. B., Maharani, A. D., Prabowo, R. U., & Amam, A. (2024). Agribisnis jamur tiram dan strategi pengembangannya. Mimbar Agribisnis, 10(1), 475–486. https://doi.org/10.25157/ma.v10i1.12099
Soejono, D., Zahroza, D. B., Maharani, A. D., & Amam, A. (2021). Performa Badan Usaha Milik Desa (BUM Desa) di Kabupaten Lumajang. Jurnal Ekonomi Pertanian Dan Agribisnis, 5(3), 935–949. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jepa.2021.005.03.29
Soejono, D., Zahroza, D. B., Maharani, A. D., Baihaqi, Y., & Amam, A. (2021). Kinerja Badan Usaha Milik Desa (Bumdes) di Kabupaten Lumajang. SEPA: Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian Dan Agribisnis, 18(1), 26–37. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.20961/sepa.v18i1.44240
Soetriono, S., Soejono, D., Zahroza, D. B., Maharani, A. D., & Amam, A. (2019). Strategi pengembangan dan diversifikasi sapi potong di Jawa Timur. Jurnal Ilmu Dan Teknologi Peternakan Tropis, 6(2), 138–145. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.33772/jitro.v6i2.5571
Supriyatna, Y., Wahyuni, S., & Rusastra, I. W. (2006). Analisis kelembagaan kemitraan usaha ternak ayam ras pedaging: Studi kasus di Provinsi Bali. Seminar Nasional Teknologi Peternakan Dan Veteriner, 2001, 833–840.
Suwandari, A., Puspaningrum, D., Soejono, D., Zahrosa, D. B., Maharani, A. D., & Prabowo, R. U. (2024). Agribisnis pengembangan plasma nutfah Kabupaten Lumajang Provinsi Jawa Timur (studi komoditas pisang mas kirana). Mimbar Agribisnis, 10(1), 487–497. https://doi.org/10.25157/ma.v10i1.12101
Suwarta, S., Irham, I., & Hartono, S. (2012). Struktur biaya dan pendapatan usaha ternak ayam broiler di Kabupaten Sleman. Jurnal Agrika, 6(1), 65–85.
Suwianggada, I., Suciani, & Sariani, N. (2012). Analisis finansial usaha peternakan ayam pedaging dengan pola kemitraan. Jurnal Peternakan Tropika, 378, 58–68.
Triansyah, F. A., Suryaningrum, D. A., Trihudiyatmanto, M., Mulya, N. P., Gultom, A. W., Sismar, A., Munzir, M., Saleh, E. R., Rachmadana, S. L., Pahmi, P., Amam, A., & Sabaria, S. (2023). Studi Kelayakan Bisnis. Edupedia Publisher.
Yaqin, M. H., Amam, A., Rusdiana, S., & Huda, A. S. (2022). Pengaruh aspek kerentanan usaha peternakan domba terhadap pembangunan peternakan berkelanjutan. Mimbar Agribisnis, 8(1), 396–406. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.25157/ma.v8i1.6829
Yulianto, R., Amam, A., Harsita, P. A., & Jadmiko, M. W. (2020). Selected dominance plant species for increasing availability production of cattle feed. E3S Web of Conferences, 03001(142), 0–3. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202014203001
Zahrosa, D. B., Soetriono, S., Soejono, D., Maharani, A. D., Baihaqi, Y., & Amam, A. (2020). Region and forecasting of banana commodity in Seroja Agropolitan Area Lumajang. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1465(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1465/1/012001.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24014/jupet.v21i1.21188
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Jurnal Peternakan has been accredited by Sinta 3 : Number 158/E/KPT/2021
Starting from Vol. 18 No. 1 Year 2021 to Vol. 22 No. 2 Year 2025
Jurnal Peternakan Indexed By:
Editorial Office:
Jurnal Peternakan
Faculty of Agriculture and Animal Science, State Islamic University of Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau.
H.R. Soebrantas street KM. 15,5 Panam – Pekanbaru city.
E-mail: jurnal.peternakan@uin-suska.ac.id
ejournal: http://ejournal.uin-suska.ac.id/index.php/peternakan
Creation is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. View Mystats