ISLAM, PERILAKU APARATUR SIPIL NEGARA DAN KRITIK EPISTIMOLOGI ILMU ADMINISTRASI NEGARA

RODI WAHYUDI; DEVI DESMIWAR

doi:10.24014/an-nida.v41i1.4636

ISLAM, PERILAKU APARATUR SIPIL NEGARA DAN KRITIK EPISTIMOLOGI ILMU ADMINISTRASI NEGARA

RODI WAHYUDI, DEVI DESMIWAR

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to examine conceptually the epistemology of state administration science and its relation to religious and bureaucratic behavior in Indonesia. Science of state administration comes from the results of Western scientists thought. The research method used in this study is literature study. Sources of literature from books and journals. The reading result is arranged in the form of theoretical debate and followed by the interpretation of the secondary data. The results showed that the origin of the science of state administration is from the history of Europe and the West with the characteristics of value-free, secular, do not incorporate religious teachings in the formation of basic theory. Whereas the development of a country will succeed if supported by a professional and trustful bureaucracy. The nature of trust will be the form if the bureaucracy practice religious teachings. Although western nations dominate scientific papers, academic books and research journals. But as an eastern nation it is not all that comes from the West swallowed raw without judging it first.

Keywords

Epistemology, Bureaucracy, State Administration, Religious Obedience

Full Text:

PDF

References

Abdun Noor. 2007. Ethics, religion and good governance. Journal of Administration & Governance 2: 62-77.

Caiden, G.E. 1973. Development, Administrative Capacity and Administrative Reform, International Review of Administrative Sciences 38 (4): 327-344.

David, H. R., & Ting Gong. 2013. Coproducing Clean Collaborative Governance. Public Performance & Management Review 36 (4): 544–561.

Denhardt, R.,B & Denhardt, J.V. 2000. The New Public Service. Public Administration Review 17(6): 320-331.

Herbert Simon. 1957. Administrative Behavior: a Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organization. New York: Macmillan.

Ibnu Khaldun. 2008. Muqaddimah (Terjemahan Masturi Irham, Malik Supar dan Abidun Zuhri). Pustaka Al-Kautsar, Jakarta.

Larbi.G.A. 1999. The New Public Management Approach and Crisis State. United Nation Research Intitute For Social Development Discussion.

Miller, G. 2000. Above Politics: Credible Commitment and Efficiency in the Design of Public Agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 10(2): 289-327.

Nicolas Berggruen & Nathan Gardels. 2012. Intelligent Governance for the 21st Century: A Middle Way between West and East. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Rodi Wahyudi. 2014. Perilaku Maladministrasi Birokrasi Dalam Perkhidmatan Awam di Kota Pekanbaru, Provinsi Riau. Disertasi Doktor Sains Sosial (Sains Pembangunan), Fakulti Sains Sosial dan Kemanusiaan, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.

Osborne, D., Gaebler, T. 1999. Mewirausahakan birokrasi (terjemahan Abdul Rasyid). Jakarta: Pustaka Binaman Pressindo.

Shuriye AO, Jamal Ibrahim. 2010. Islamic perspective of quality administration. Australian Journal of Islamic Studies 02 (01): 49-57.

Wilson, Woodrow. 1887. The Study of Administration. Political Science Quarterly, 2(2): 197-222.Stillman, R.J. 1991. Preface to public administration: A search for themes and direction. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

Syed Abul Hasan Ali An Nadwy. 1951. Kerugian Dunia Karena Kemunduran Umat Islam. Surabaya : Penerbit PT. Bina Ilmu.

Wilson, Woodrow. 1887. The Study of Administration. Political Science Quarterly, 2(2): 197-222.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24014/an-nida.v41i1.4636