Emerging Trends of Technology-Integrated Problem-Based Learning in Physics Problem Solving: A Bibliometric Analysis (2015–2025)

Ike Nurdela Anggraini; Dwikoranto Dwikoranto; Rahmatta Thoriq Lintangesukmanjaya; Sukarni Sukarni; Marsini Marsini; Indri Hapsari Khansa; Neisya Azaria Adinda Putri

doi:10.24014/jnsi.v9i1.39168

Emerging Trends of Technology-Integrated Problem-Based Learning in Physics Problem Solving: A Bibliometric Analysis (2015–2025)

Ike Nurdela Anggraini, Dwikoranto Dwikoranto, Rahmatta Thoriq Lintangesukmanjaya, Sukarni Sukarni, Marsini Marsini, Indri Hapsari Khansa, Neisya Azaria Adinda Putri

Abstract

This study aims to map and analyze research trends in technology-integrated problem-based learning (PBL) for physics problem-solving from 2015 to 2025. A quantitative bibliometric design was employed using the Scopus database as the primary data source. An initial search identified 49,401 documents, which were filtered using the PRISMA framework based on relevance, publication year, and screening criteria, yielding 154 publications for the final analysis. Data were analyzed using VOSviewer to examine publication trends, document types, subject areas, country contributions, and keyword co-occurrence networks. Additionally, the ten most highly cited articles were narratively reviewed to identify dominant research directions. The findings reveal a significant increase in publications, particularly in the last two years, indicating rapid growth in this field. Network and overlay visualizations show that problem-solving occupies a central position and is strongly connected to machine learning, deep learning, and intelligent learning systems. At the same time, PBL remains an emerging and less dominant theme. These findings indicate that although research on educational technologies in physics learning is rapidly expanding, the integration of Problem-Based Learning remains limited, highlighting an underexplored intersection between technological advancement and pedagogical implementation in physics education. The study concludes that this gap represents a key direction for future research in strengthening technology-integrated Problem-Based Learning to enhance students’ physics problem-solving skills.

Keywords: bibliometric analysis, physics, problem solving, problem-based learning, technology

Full Text:

PDF

References

Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007

Asriadi, A. M., Purnama, E., & Sanam, A. I. (2025). Diagnosing students’ difficulties and strategies to overcome them in physics learning. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 29(2). https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v29i2.89736

Bond, M., Buntins, K., Bedenlier, S., Zawacki-Richter, O., & Kerres, M. (2020). Faculty professional development for digital teaching and learning in higher education: A systematic review. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(4), 1635–1657. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09762-2

Diao, Y., Yang, J., Zhang, Y., Zhang, D., & Du, Y. (2023). Solving multi-material problems in solid mechanics using physics-informed neural networks. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 413, 116120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2023.116120

Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070

Dwikoranto, D., Dawana, I. R., & Setiani, R. (2023). Validity of teaching modules with problem-based learning assisted by e-book to improve problem-solving skills. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2623(1), 012015. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2623/1/012015

Dwikoranto, D., Dawana, I. R., & Setiani, R. (2024). Research trend of problem-based learning and project-based learning in physics education: A bibliometric analysis. Studies in Learning and Teaching, 5(2), 210–223. https://doi.org/10.46627/silet.v5i2.359

Farkhan, M. M., Kuswanto, H., & Wiyatmo, Y. (2025). Project-based learning in physics education: A bibliometric review. EduSains, 17(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.15408/es.v17i1.39367

Farrag, A., Yang, Y., Cao, N., Won, D., & Jin, Y. (2025). Physics-informed machine learning for metal additive manufacturing. Progress in Additive Manufacturing, 10(1), 171–189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-024-00490-4

Feziyasti, A., Suhengki, M. F., Pratiwi, A. D., Asrizal, A., & Festiyed, F. (2025). Analysis of the development of electronic teaching materials integrated with problem-based learning to promote critical thinking skills. Journal of Innovative Physics Teaching, 3(1), 43–57. https://doi.org/10.24036/jipt/vol3-iss1/84

Gao, Z., Xu, Y., & Zhang, L. (2021). Iterative learning-based optimization for complex engineering systems. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 98, 104114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2020.104114

Halim, M. G. (2025). Systematic literature review: What do the studies reveal about problem-based learning in physics education. PUPIL: International Journal of Teaching, Education and Learning, 670–694. https://doi.org/10.20319/ictel.2025.670694

Haryandi, S., Arlinda, R., Misbah, M., Harto, M., Muhammad, N., & Sunardi, S. (2024). Bibliometric analysis: Trends of gamification in physics learning from 2019 to 2023. Momentum: Physics Education Journal, 8(2), 181–193. https://doi.org/10.21067/mpej.v8i2.9877

Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn?. Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235–266. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034022.16470.f3

Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Educause Review, 27.

Huang, H. Y., Bharti, K., Rebentrost, P., & Lloyd, S. (2021). Quantum algorithms for solving linear systems in physics applications. Nature Physics, 17(7), 811–817. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-021-01287-9

Khan, A., Chiroma, H., Imran, M., & Herawan, T. (2021). Machine learning techniques for complex system modeling and prediction: A review. Applied Soft Computing, 106, 107338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107338

Lintangesukmanjaya, R. T., Prahani, B. K., Dwikoranto, D., Alhusni, H. Z., & Kurtuluş, M. A. (2025). Technology integration for SDGs-oriented social science education: A bibliometric perspective. E3S Web of Conferences, 640, 02017. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202564002017

Lintangesukmanjaya, R. T., Prahani, B. K., Dwikoranto, D., Alifah, D. R. Z. Z., Salleh, S. b. H. M., & Wicaksono, I. (2025). Bibliometric analysis of physics learning studies: Focus on differentiation and problem-solving strategies. Journal of Law and Bibliometrics Studies, 1(1), 42. https://doi.org/10.63230/jolabis.1.1.42

Ministry of Education, Culture, Research, and Technology of Indonesia. (2022). Guidelines for the implementation of the Merdeka Curriculum. https://www.kemdikbud.go.id

Mousavinasab, E., Zarifsanaiey, N., Niakan Kalhori, S. R., Rakhshan, M., Keikha, L., & Ghazi Saeedi, M. (2020). Intelligent tutoring systems: A systematic review. Journal of Medical Systems, 44(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-019-1505-4

Musengimana, T., Yadav, L. L., Uwamahoro, J., & Nizeyimana, G. (2025). Assessing physics students’ problem-solving skills. Discover Education, 4(196), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00640-1

Nurjanah, S., Sultan, J., Aisyah, S., Puspita, D., & Ulyasari, N. (2023). Bibliometric analysis of problem-based learning in physics education. Berkala Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika, 11(1), 58–69. https://doi.org/10.20527/bipf.v12i2.18775

OECD. (2021). Future of education and skills 2030: Curriculum analysis. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/education/2030-project/

OECD. (2021). Global education outlook 2021: Shaping the future of education. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/education/global-education-outlook/

Paas, F., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2020). Cognitive load theory: Methods to manage working memory load in the learning of complex tasks. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 29(4), 394–398. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721420922183

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., et al. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Page, M. J., Moher, D., Bossuyt, P. M., et al. (2021). PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration. BMJ, 372, n160. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n160

Parno, P., Yuliati, L., Hermanto, F. M., & Ali, M. (2020). Comparison of PBL-STEM, PBL, and conventional learning. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 9(2), 159–168. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v9i2.23894

Prahani, B. K., Rizki, I. A., Nisa’, K., et al. (2022). Online problem-based learning assisted by digital book with 3D animations. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 12(2), 379–396. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.1590

Putri, F. I., Deswalman, D., & Tosin, A. I. (2024). Meta-analysis of PBL models on physics problem-solving abilities. EduFisika, 9(1), 74–80. https://doi.org/10.59052/edufisika.v9i1.32648

Skulmowski, A., & Xu, K. M. (2022). Understanding cognitive load in digital and online learning: A new perspective on extraneous cognitive load. Educational Psychology Review, 34, 171–196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09624-7

Sun, L., Tang, Y., & Zuo, W. (2023). Digital transformation in education: A bibliometric analysis. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11339-3

Sunarti, T., Satriawan, M., Prahani, B. K., & Rizki, I. A. (2024). Integrating digital books, 3D animations, and online PBL. Jurnal Penelitian Fisika dan Aplikasinya, 14(2), 169–183. https://doi.org/10.26740/jpfa.v14n2.p169-183

Sung, Y. T., Chang, K. E., & Liu, T. C. (2022). The effects of integrating technology-supported learning on higher-order thinking. Educational Technology & Society, 25(2), 1–14.

Suryawati, E., Osman, K., & Meerah, T. S. M. (2023). Applying PRISMA in educational research. International Journal of Instruction, 16(2), 245–260. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2023.16214a

Tahamtan, I., & Bornmann, L. (2019). What do citation counts measure? An updated review of studies on citations in scientific documents published between 2006 and 2018. Scientometrics, 121(3), 1635–1684. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03243-4

Tajjour, S., & Chandel, S. S. (2023). Sustainable energy microgrids using machine learning techniques. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 58, 103377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2023.103377

Trust, T., & Whalen, J. (2020). Should teachers be trained in emergency remote teaching? Lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 28(2), 189–199. https://doi.org/10.70725/307718pkpjuu

Tschisgale, P. L., Wulff, P., & Kubsch, M. (2023). Integrating artificial intelligence-based methods into physics education research. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 19(2), 020123. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.19.020123

UNESCO. (2023). Technology in education: A tool on whose terms? UNESCO Publishing.

van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3

van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2020). VOSviewer manual (Version 1.6.16). Leiden University.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Zuo, Y., Zhou, L., Liu, Y., & Li, D. (2021). Deep learning-enabled optical measurement and inverse problem solving. Light: Science & Applications, 10(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41377-021-00505-3

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24014/jnsi.v9i1.39168