Virtual Laboratory Science to Improve Students' Science Literacy Ability

Dina Rahmi Darman; Imaningtyas Imaningtyas; Nina Nurhasanah; Linda Zakiah; Nursifa Fauziah; Dewi Rahayu Ningsih; Firmanul Catur Wibowo; Andi Suhandi; Ida Kaniawati; Achmad Samsudin Samsudin; Beken Arymbekov

doi:10.24014/jnsi.v9i1.37902

Virtual Laboratory Science to Improve Students' Science Literacy Ability

Dina Rahmi Darman, Imaningtyas Imaningtyas, Nina Nurhasanah, Linda Zakiah, Nursifa Fauziah, Dewi Rahayu Ningsih, Firmanul Catur Wibowo, Andi Suhandi, Ida Kaniawati, Achmad Samsudin Samsudin, Beken Arymbekov

Abstract

Technological developments in education demand innovation in learning media to overcome the limitations of laboratory facilities and conventional methods, especially in elementary science education. Prospective elementary school teachers need to have strong scientific literacy to support meaningful learning. This study aims to develop a Virtual Science Laboratory (VSL) as a flexible, interactive, technology-based medium to improve students' Scientific Literacy Skills (SLA). The approach used is Research and Development (R&D) with the model Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, Evaluation (ADDIE). Data were collected from 120 prospective elementary school teachers in Jakarta, Indonesia, aged 21–23 years. SSC was measured through a science literacy test (pretest-posttest) and analyzed with Normalized gain (N-Gain). The results showed that VSL significantly improved scientific literacy, with an average increase of 59.4% (moderate effect size). Each aspect of SLA increased: Explanation of Scientific Phenomena (61%), Interpretation of Data & Evidence (77%), Evaluation & Experimental Design (42%), Use of Scientific Evidence (58%), and Awareness of Scientific Applications (59%). These findings demonstrate the effectiveness of VSL as an innovative solution for technology-based science learning, particularly in contexts with limited physical lab space. VSL is recommended for integration into science education curricula as a 21st-century learning approach to support the professional competency of prospective teachers.

Keywords: virtual laboratory, science education, science literacy, student ability, learning innovation.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Abina, A., Temeljotov Salaj, A., Cestnik, B., Karalič, A., Ogrinc, M., Kovačič Lukma, R., & Zidanšek, A. (2024). Challenging 21st-century competencies for STEM students: Companies’ vision in Slovenia and Norway in the light of global initiatives for competencies development. Sustainability, 16(3), 1295. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16031295

Adones, B. C. (2024). Enhancing conceptual understanding of electricity and magnetism through VR simulations. International Journal of Current Science Research and Review, 7(10). https://doi.org/10.47191/ijcsrr/v7-i10-50

Akerson, V. L., & Bartels, S. L. (2023). Elementary science teaching: Toward the goal of scientific literacy. Dalam Handbook of research on science education (hlm. 528-558). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367855758-22

Alema, B. G., Tesfamariam, G. M., Berhe, G. G., & Gebretsadik, T. T. (2024). Practices and challenges in implementing chemistry laboratory work in secondary schools: A review. African Journal of Chemical Education, 14(2), 31-60.

Alharbi, N. S. (2024). Exploring the perspectives of cross-cultural instructors on integrating 21st century skills into EFL university courses. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1302608. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1302608

Asare, S., Amoako, S. K., Biilah, D. K., & Apraku, T. B. (2023). The use of virtual labs in science education: A comparative study of traditional labs and virtual environments. International Journal of Science Academic Research, 4(11), 6563-6569.

Atchia, S. M. C., & Rumjaun, A. (2023). The real and virtual science laboratories. Dalam Contemporary issues in science and technology education (hlm. 113-127). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24259-5_9

Babu, B. V. (2024). Education 5.0: An overview. Dalam Advances in Technological Innovations in Higher Education (hlm. 168-243). CRC Press.

Badmus, O. T., & Jita, L. C. (2024). Physics difficulty and problem-solving: Exploring the role of mathematics and mathematical symbols. Interdisciplinary Journal of Education Research, 6, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.51986/ijer-2024.v6.01

Baik, C., Larcombe, W., & Brooker, A. (2019). How universities can enhance student mental wellbeing: The student perspective. Higher Education Research & Development, 38(4), 674-687. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2019.1576596

Bogusevschi, D., Muntean, C., & Muntean, G. M. (2020). Teaching and learning physics using 3D virtual learning environment: A case study of combined virtual reality and virtual laboratory in secondary school. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 39(1), 5-18.

Bybee, R. W., & Powell, J. C. (2024). Teaching secondary school science: Strategies for developing scientific literacy. BoD–Books on Demand.

Çakır, R., Korkmaz, Ö., İdil, Ö., & Erdoğmuş, F. U. (2021). The effect of robotic coding education on preschoolers’ problem solving and creative thinking skills. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 40, 100812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100812

Chans, G. M., Bravo-Gutiérrez, M. E., Orona-Navar, A., & Sánchez-Rodríguez, E. P. (2022). Compilation of chemistry experiments for an online laboratory course: Student’s perception and learning outcomes in the context of COVID-19. Sustainability, 14(5), 2539. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14052539

Chegini, K. R., Pakravan-Charvadeh, M. R., Rahimian, M., & Gholamrezaie, S. (2021). Is there a linkage between household welfare and income inequality, and food security to achieve sustainable development goals? Journal of Cleaner Production, 326, 129390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129390

Devi, D. R., Margaret, T. S., & Avanthika, K. (2024). Navigating the future: Harnessing artificial intelligence and robotics for economic growth while safeguarding societal well-being. Dalam Advanced Businesses in Industry 6.0 (hlm. 176-191). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-0145-6.ch010

Doni, C. P., Husain, D., Saleh, S. R., Pakaya, N. A., Tjalau, C. A., & Arsyad, B. (2021). Challenges of digital literacy education in pandemic period. Journal of Education Review Provision, 1(1), 18-22. https://doi.org/10.47353/jerp.v1i1.5

El Kharki, K., Berrada, K., & Burgos, D. (2021). Design and implementation of a virtual laboratory for physics subjects in Moroccan universities. Sustainability, 13(7), 3711. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13073711

Erdoğan, V. (2019). Integrating 4C skills of 21st century into 4 language skills in EFL classes. International Journal of Education and Research, 7(11), 113-124.

Fajri, P., Relita, H., Sari, M. P., Hakiem, N., & Setiawan, Y. G. (2022). A design of interactive learning applications for phytochemical screening in vocational college. Dalam Handbook of Research on Implementing Digital Reality and Interactive Technologies to Achieve Society 5.0 (hlm. 65-84). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-9247-2.ch004

Gnesdilow, D., & Puntambekar, S. (2022). Comparing middle school students’ science explanations during physical and virtual laboratories. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 31(2), 191-202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-021-09941-8

Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64-74. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18809

Harefa, D., Sarumaha, M., Telaumbanua, K., Telaumbanua, T., Laia, B., & Hulu, F. (2023). Relationship student learning interest to the learning outcomes of natural sciences. International Journal of Educational Research and Social Sciences (IJERSC), 4(2), 240-246. https://doi.org/10.51601/ijersc.v4i2.635

Harudu, L., Kasmiati, S., Hasan, S., Sugiarto, A., Karim, A. T. A., Syarifuddin, S., & Sejati, A. E. (2024). The impact of PhET-assisted problem-solving model on enhancing students' physics problem-solving skills in Indonesian high schools. Multi Discere Journal, 3(2), 59-71.

Holland, C., McCarthy, A., Ferri, P., & Shapira, P. (2024). Innovation intermediaries at the convergence of digital technologies, sustainability, and governance: A case study of AI-enabled engineering biology. Technovation, 129, 102875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2023.102875

Hursen, C. (2021). The effect of problem-based learning method supported by web 2.0 tools on academic achievement and critical thinking skills in teacher education. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 26(3), 515-533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-020-09458-2

Kalyani, L. K. (2024). The role of technology in education: Enhancing learning outcomes and 21st century skills. International Journal of Scientific Research in Modern Science and Technology, 3(4), 05-10.

Kapici, H. O., Akcay, H., & de Jong, T. (2019). Using hands-on and virtual laboratories alone or together—Which works better for acquiring knowledge and skills? Journal of Science Education and Technology, 28(2), 126-136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-018-9762-0

Kapilan, N., Vidhya, P., & Gao, X. Z. (2021). Virtual laboratory: A boon to the mechanical engineering education during covid-19 pandemic. Higher Education for the Future, 8(1), 31-46. https://doi.org/10.1177/2347631120970757

Karadimas, P. (2024). Thought experiments and the pragmatic nature of explanation. Foundations of Science, 29(2), 257-280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-023-09908-w

Khan, P. A., Johl, S. K., Akhtar, S., Asif, M., Salameh, A. A., & Kanesan, T. (2022). Open innovation of institutional investors and higher education system in creating open approach for SDG-4 quality education: A conceptual review. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 8(1), 49. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8010049

Khan, Z. H., & Abid, M. I. (2021). Distance learning in engineering education: Challenges and opportunities during COVID-19 pandemic crisis in Pakistan. The International Journal of Electrical Engineering & Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020720920988493

Khoiriyah, S., & Suprapto, N. (2021). Effectiveness of comics to train students’ critical thinking skills in physics learning: A mini-review. Studies in Learning and Teaching, 2(1), 5-15. https://doi.org/10.46627/silet.v2i1.56

Klein, P., Ivanjek, L., Dahlkemper, M. N., Jeličić, K., Geyer, M. A., Küchemann, S., & Susac, A. (2021). Studying physics during the COVID-19 pandemic: Student assessments of learning achievement, perceived effectiveness of online recitations, and online laboratories. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 17(1), 010117. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.17.010117

Kolil, V. K., & Achuthan, K. (2024). Virtual labs in chemistry education: A novel approach for increasing student’s laboratory educational consciousness and skills. Education and Information Technologies, 29(18), 25307-25331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12690-3

Kumar, V., Choudhary, S. K., & Singh, R. (2024). Environmental socio-scientific issues as contexts in developing scientific literacy in science education: A systematic literature review. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 9, 100765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100765

Larsson, J., & Larsson, L. (2020). Integration, application and importance of collaboration in sustainable project management. Sustainability, 12(2), 585. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12020585

Maruf, M., & Dhiqfaini Sultan, A. (2023). Analysis of the use of interactive multimedia android thermodynamics to reduce student misconceptions. European Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences, 12(1), 204-213.

Mönch, C., & Markic, S. (2022). Science teachers’ pedagogical scientific language knowledge—A systematic review. Education Sciences, 12(7), 497. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12070497

Ødegaard, N. B., Myrhaug, H. T., Dahl-Michelsen, T., & Røe, Y. (2021). Digital learning designs in physiotherapy education: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Medical Education, 21(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02483-w

Oghlu Sharifov, G. M. (2020). The effectiveness of using a virtual laboratory in the teaching of electromagnetism in the lyceum. Physics Education, 55(6), 065011. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6552/abb18a

Osborne, J. (2023). Science, scientific literacy, and science education. Dalam Handbook of research on science education (hlm. 785-816). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367855758-31

Papanastasiou, G., Drigas, A., Skianis, C., Lytras, M., & Papanastasiou, E. (2019). Virtual and augmented reality effects on K-12, higher and tertiary education students’ twenty-first century skills. Virtual Reality, 23(4), 425-436. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-018-0363-2

Pereira, A., & Solbes, J. (2021). The dynamics of perspective in quantum physics. Science & Education, 30, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00277-x

Puspitaningtyas, E., Putri, E. F. N., Umrotul, U., & Sutopo, S. (2020). Analysis of high school student’s concept mastery in light wave using structured inquiry learning assisted by a virtual laboratory. Revista Mexicana de Física E, 18(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.31349/RevMexFisE.18.10

Richey, R. C., Klein, J. D., & Tracey, M. W. (2019). The instructional design knowledge base: Theory, research, and practice. Routledge.

Saharan, V. A., Kulhari, H., Jadhav, H., Pooja, D., Banerjee, S., & Singh, A. (2024). Introduction to research methodology. Dalam Principles of Research Methodology and Ethics in Pharmaceutical Sciences (hlm. 1-46). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003260196-1

Salinas-Navarro, D. E., Vilalta-Perdomo, E., Michel-Villarreal, R., & Montesinos, L. (2024). Designing experiential learning activities with generative artificial intelligence tools for authentic assessment. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 21(4), 708-734. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-09-2023-0174

Semenikhina, O., Yurchenko, A., Udovychenko, A., Petruk, V. A., Borozenets, N., & Nekyslykh, K. (2021). Formation of skills to visualize of future physics teacher: Results of the pedagogical experiment. Revista Universul Juridic (atau Revista Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensionala), 13(2), 476-497. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/13.2/432

Sheehy, S. (2023). The matter of everything: How curiosity, physics, and improbable experiments changed the world. Knopf.

Shirish, A., Chandra, S., & Srivastava, S. C. (2021). Switching to online learning during COVID-19: Theorizing the role of IT mindfulness and techno eustress for facilitating productivity and creativity in student learning. International Journal of Information Management, 61, 102394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102394

Siburian, J., Corebima, A. D., & Saptasari, M. (2019). The correlation between critical and creative thinking skills on cognitive learning results. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 19(81), 99-114. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2019.81.6

Smith, G., Minor, M., & Brashen, H. (2018). Spiritual leadership: A guide to a leadership style that embraces multiple perspectives. Journal of Instructional Research, 7, 80-89. https://doi.org/10.19030/jir.v7i1.10232

Sung, S. H., Li, C., Huang, X., & Xie, C. (2021). Enhancing distance learning of science—Impacts of remote labs 2.0 on students' behavioural and cognitive engagement. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(6), 1606-1621. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12586

Tawinno, J., & Jantakoon, J. (2025). The development of a protecting the world science club activities curriculum based on challenge-based learning collaborative systems thinking to enhance complex problem-solving competency among high school students. Journal of Practical Studies in Education, 6(4), 54-66. https://doi.org/10.46827/jpse.v6i4.551

Tortorella, G. L., Vergara, A. M. C., Garza-Reyes, J. A., & Sawhney, R. (2020). Organizational learning paths based upon industry 4.0 adoption: An empirical study with Brazilian manufacturers. International Journal of Production Economics, 219, 284-294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.06.023

Vo, D. V., & Simmie, G. M. (2025). Assessing scientific inquiry: A systematic literature review of tasks, tools and techniques. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 23(4), 871-906. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-024-10457-3

Wibowo, F. C., Nasbey, H., Sanjaya, L. A., Darman, D. R., Gumala, Y., Adityo, F. P., & Budi, A. S. (2021, March). Game open online physics instructional (GOOPI) for technology improving 21st-century careers. Dalam IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (Vol. 1098, No. 3, hlm. 032079). IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/1098/3/032079

Wibowo, F. C., Suhandi, A., Rusdiana, D., Darman, D. R., Ruhiat, Y., Denny, Y. R., & Fatah, A. (2016, August). Microscopic virtual media (MVM) in physics learning: Case study on students understanding of heat transfer. Dalam Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 739, No. 1, hlm. 012044). IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/739/1/012044

Wibowo, F. C., Suhandi, A., Nahadi, N., & Coştu, B. (2017). Virtual Microscopic Simulation (VMS) to promote students’ conceptual change: A case study of heat transfer. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 18(2), 1-32.

Wong, R. (2020). When no one can go to school: Does online learning meet students’ basic learning needs? Interactive Learning Environments, 31(4), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1856394

Xhomara, N. (2022). Critical thinking: Student-centred teaching approach and personalised learning, as well as previous education achievements, contribute to critical thinking skills of students. International Journal of Learning and Change, 14(1), 101-120. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJLC.2022.120286

Zhang, H., Zhu, C., Sang, G., & Questier, F. (2024). Effects of digital media literacy course on primary school students’ digital media literacy: An experimental study. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 34(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-023-09819-3

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24014/jnsi.v9i1.37902