USING FISHBONE DIAGRAM STRATEGY ON STUDENTS’ WRITING ANALYTICAL EXPOSITION TEXT
Abstract
This research was conducted based on students’ problems in writing, such as students have difficulty in developing ideas, students have difficulty in choosing correct grammar, and students have difficulty in writing sentences because lack of vocabulary. The main focus of this research is to investigate whether there is a significant difference on the students’ writing analytical exposition text before and after being taught by using the fishbone diagram strategy at the eleventh science grade students of Senior High School 15 Pekanbaru. The research design in this research was pre-experimental with one group pre-test and post-test design. The sample of this research was class the eleventh science 3 which consists of 35 students. The sample was taken by using purposive sampling technique. In collecting the data, the researcher used a writing test to determine the students’ writing skill of analytical exposition text. In analyzing the data, the researcher used the paired sample t-test formula calculated by using SPSS version 22. The results of the data analysis showed that the tobtained higher than ttable (2.179 > 2.032) with the significance level 0.05, and the degree of freedom (df) was 34 and the significant value was lower than the significant level (0.036 < 0.05). It means that Ho was rejected and Ha was accepted. So, there is a significant difference on the students’ writing analytical exposition text before and after being taught by using the fishbone diagram strategy.
Keywords: Writing, Analytical Exposition, Fishbone Diagram.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Akdeniz, Celal. (2016). Instructional Process and Concepts in Theory and Practice Improving the Teaching Process. Singapore: Springer.
Ardianto, A., Hidayat, D. N., & Eviyuliwati, I. (2020). The Effect of Fishbone Diagram on Students’ Writing of Analytical Exposition Text. ICEMS. DOI: 10.4108/eai.30-9-2019.2291131.
Brown, H. Douglas & Lee, Heekyeong. (2015). Teaching by Principles An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy, Fourth Edition. New York: Pearson Education, Inc.
Dale, B. G. (2003). Managing Quality, Fourth Edition. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Dirgeyasa, I Wy. (2016). College Academic Writing: A Genre-Based Perspective. Jakarta: Kencana.
Emilda, Ilza & Hamzah H. (2021). The Effect of Fishbone Method on Students Writing Ability of Report Text. Journal of English Language Teaching, 10(4), 715-723. DOI: 10.24036/jelt.v10i4.114903.
Fauziah, Meli. (2022). The Effectiveness of Fishbone Diagram Method on Students’ Writing Ability of Argumentative Text. LENTERNAL: Learning and Teaching Journal, 3(1), 1-4. DOI: 10.32923/lenternal/.v3i1.2229.
Harmer, Jeremy. (2004). How to Teach Writing. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
Hughes, Arthur. (2003). Testing for Language Teachers, Second Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Irwan, A. F., Syafei, A. F. R., & Marlina, L. (2018). Students’ Ability in Writing An Analytical Exposition Text at Department of Universitas Negeri Padang. Journal of English Language Teaching, 7(1), 171-176.
Richards, Jack C. (2004). Second Language Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Safitri, Aulia & Nanda, Deri sis. (2016). The Influence of Using Fishbone Ishikawa Technique to Improve Students’ Writing Skill of The First Semester Students of English Education Study Program Teacher Training and Education Faculty Universitas Bandar Lampung. Jurnal Linguistika, 7(2), 44-47.
Ulfi, R., Charlina, C., & Septyanti, E. (2021). The Quality of Student Worksheets (LKPD) on Writing Description Text Through Fishbone Diagram Strategy. Jurnal PAJAR (Pendidikan dan Pengajaran), 5(5), 1497-1506.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Indonesian Journal of Integrated English Language Teaching (p-ISSN 2355-5971)
Fakultas Tarbiyah dan Keguruan
Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau
Address: Jl. H. R. Soebrantas KM. 15 Tuahmadani, Tuahmadani Pekanbaru
