Analisis Tren Penelitian Argumentasi Ilmiah dalam  Pembelajaran IPA Tahun 2015–2024: Sebuah Studi  Bibliometrik

Octavia Ulya Mafaza; Siswanto Siswanto; Suwito Singgih

doi:10.24014/idj.v8i3.38594

Analisis Tren Penelitian Argumentasi Ilmiah dalam Pembelajaran IPA Tahun 2015–2024: Sebuah Studi Bibliometrik

Octavia Ulya Mafaza, Siswanto Siswanto, Suwito Singgih

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis tren penelitian mengenai argumentasi ilmiah dalam pembelajaran IPA pada tahun 2015–2024. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode literature review dengan pendekatan analisis isi (content analysis) terhadap 123 artikel ilmiah yang dikumpulkan melalui basis data nasional dan internasional. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan perkembangan dinamis sepanjang 2015–2024, dengan fokus yang masih terpusat pada jenjang SMA dan model pembelajaran berbasis inkuiri, terutama model pembelajaran Argument-Driven Inquiry (ADI). Area yang masih kurang mendapat perhatian mencakup jenjang SD, penelitian berbasis guru, pemanfaatan teknologi digital, serta bidang IPA seperti ilmu bumi dan lingkungan. Temuan ini memberikan kontribusi penting dalam memetakan celah penelitian yang selama ini belum banyak dieksplorasi, sekaligus menawarkan arah pengembangan riset argumentasi ilmiah yang lebih luas dan relevan ke depan.

TRANSLATE with xEnglishArabic Hebrew Polish Bulgarian Hindi Portuguese Catalan Hmong Daw Romanian Chinese Simplified Hungarian Russian Chinese Traditional Indonesian Slovak Czech Italian Slovenian Danish Japanese Spanish Dutch Klingon Swedish English Korean Thai Estonian Latvian Turkish Finnish Lithuanian Ukrainian French Malay Urdu German Maltese Vietnamese Greek Norwegian Welsh Haitian Creole Persian TRANSLATE with COPY THE URL BELOW BackEMBED THE SNIPPET BELOW IN YOUR SITE Enable collaborative features and customize widget: Bing Webmaster Portal Back

Keywords

Argumentasi Ilmiah Pembelajaran IPA Tren Penelitian

References

Al-Ajm, B., & Ambusaidi, A. (2022). The Level of Scientific Argumentation Skills in Chemistry Subject among Grade 11th Students: The Role of Logical Thinking. Science Education International, 33(1), 66–74. https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v33.i1.7

Antonio, R. P., & Prudente, M. S. (2023a). Effects of Inquiry-Based Approaches on Students’ Higher-Order Thinking Skills in Science: A Meta-Analysis. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 12(1), 251–281. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.3216

Antonio, R. P., & Prudente, M. S. (2023b). Effects of Inquiry-Based Approaches on Students’ Higher-Order Thinking Skills in Science: A Meta-Analysis. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 12(1), 251–281. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.3216

Asterhan, C. S. C., Schwarz, B. B., Asterhan, C. S. C., & Schwarz, B. B. (2016). Argumentation for Learning : Well-Trodden Paths and Unexplored Territories Argumentation for Learning : Well-Trodden Paths and Unexplored Territories. 1520(April). https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2016.1155458

Chan, J., & Erduran, S. (2023). The Impact of Collaboration Between Science and Religious Education Teachers on Their Understanding and Views of Argumentation. Research in Science Education, 53(1), 121–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-022-10041-1

Darmaji, D., Astalini, A., Kurniawan, D. A., & Triani, E. (2022). The effect of science process skills of students argumentation skills. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 8(1), 78–88. https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v8i1.49224

Erduran, S., Guilfoyle, L., & Park, W. (2022). Science and Religious Education Teachers’ Views of Argumentation and Its Teaching. Research in Science Education, 52(2), 655–673. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-020-09966-2

Firdaos, I. N., Pursitasari, I. D., & Permana, I. (2021). Pembelajaran Argument Driven Inquiry Pada Materi Suhu dan Kalor Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Argumentasi Ilmiah Siswa. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan, 21(2), 88–97. https://doi.org/10.17509/jpp.v21i2.37134

Fortus, D., Lin, J., Neumann, K., & Sadler, T. D. (2022). The role of affect in science literacy for all. International Journal of Science Education, 44(4), 535–555. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2022.2036384

Gouvea, J., Appleby, L., Fu, L., & Wagh, A. (2022). Motivating and Shaping Scientific Argumentation in Lab Reports. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 21(4). https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.21-11-0316

Gültepe, N., & Kılıç, Z. (2021). The Effects of Scientific Argumentation on High School Students’ Critical Thinking Skills. International Journal of Progressive Education, 17(6), 183–200. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2021.382.13

Hidayanti, N., Juhanda, A., & Nuranti, G. (2022). Pengaruh Model Argument Driven Inquiry terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi Berdasarkan Perbedaan Gaya Belajar Siswa SMP pada Materi Sistem Ekskresi. Bioscientist : Jurnal Ilmiah Biologi, 10(2), 563. https://doi.org/10.33394/bioscientist.v10i2.5397

Iwuanyanwu, P. N. (2023). When Science Is Taught This Way, Students Become Critical Friends: Setting the Stage for Student Teachers. Research in Science Education, 53(6), 1063–1079. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-023-10122-9

Jimenez, P. C., Alred, A. R., & Dauer, J. M. (2024). Describing undergraduate students’ reasoning and use of evidence during argumentation about socioscientific issues systems. Frontiers in Education, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1371095

Kumar, V., Choudhary, S. K., & Singh, R. (2024). Environmental socio-scientific issues as contexts in developing scientific literacy in science education: A systematic literature review. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 9, 100765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100765

Lestari, D. P., Paidi, P., & Suwarjo, S. (2024a). Effect of the inquiry-based nature of science argumentation instructional model in scientific literacy skills. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 18(3), 734–744. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v18i3.21024

Lestari, D. P., Paidi, P., & Suwarjo, S. (2024b). Effect of the inquiry-based nature of science argumentation instructional model in scientific literacy skills. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 18(3), 734–744. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v18i3.21024

Lestari, D. P., Paidi, & Suwarjo. (2024c). Development and validation of the inquiry-based nature of science and argumentation: A new instructional model on students’ scientific argumentation ability. International Journal of Education and Practice, 12(2), 189–206. https://doi.org/10.18488/61.v12i2.3657

Li, Y., Wang, K., Xiao, Y., & Froyd, J. E. (2020). Research and trends in STEM education: a systematic review of journal publications. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00207-6

Lin, T.-J., Lin, T.-C., Potvin, P., & Tsai, C.-C. (2019). Research trends in science education from 2013 to 2017: a systematic content analysis of publications in selected journals. International Journal of Science Education, 41(3), 367–387. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1550274

Liu, S., Liu, C., Samarapungavan, A., Gardner, S. M., Clase, K. L., & Pelaez, N. J. (2024). A Framework for Evidentiary Reasoning in Biology: Insights from Laboratory Courses Focused on Evolutionary Tree-thinking. Science & Education, 33(6), 1435–1466. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-023-00435-6

Misbah, M., Hamidah, I., Sriyati, S., & Samsudin, A. (2024). The Shifting Tendency of Inquiry Learning Research in the Last Five Years: Real Contribution in Physics Education. KnE Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v9i13.16070

Muhiddin, St. M. A., & Agussalim, A. (2023). PENERAPAN MODEL ARGUMENT-DRIVEN INQUIRY UNTUK MENINGKATKAN KEMAMPUAN BERARGUMENTASI ILMIAH MAHASISWA PADA TOPIK KALOR. Karst : JURNAL PENDIDIKAN FISIKA DAN TERAPANNYA, 6(2), 94–106. https://doi.org/10.46918/karst.v6i2.2108

Nugroho, A. A., Sajidan, S., Suranto, S., & Masykuri, M. (2025). Enhancing students argumentation skills through socio-scientific real-world inquiry: A quasi-experimental study in biological education. Journal of Pedagogical Research. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.202531979

Nurtamara, L., & Widyastuti, D. A. (2023). The Improving evidence-based argumentation on socioscientific issues through problem-based learning in science students. Biosfer, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.21009/biosferjpb.35534

Park, W., Erduran, S., & Guilfoyle, L. (2022). Secondary teachers’ instructional practices on argumentation in the context of science and religious education. International Journal of Science Education, 44(8), 1251–1276. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2022.2074565

Satriya, M. A., & Atun, S. (2024). The Effect of Argument Driven Inquiry Learning Models on Scientific Argumentation Skills and Higher Order Students on The Topics of Acid Base. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(5), 2663–2673. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i5.6834

Satyaloka, L., & Padmaningrum, R. T. (2025). Systematic Literature Review: Students’ Scientific Argumentation Skills in Chemistry Learning. Indonesian Journal of Chemical Education, 1(2), 42–47. https://doi.org/10.21831/ijce.v1i2.81473

Shofiyah, N., Suprapto, N., Prahani, B. K., Jatmiko, B., Anggraeni, D. M., & Nisa’, K. (2024). Exploring undergraduate students’ scientific reasoning in the force and motion concept. Cogent Education, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2365579

Smit, R., Rietz, F., & Büchel, D. (2025). Using the socioscientific issue approach to foster secondary students’ argumentation skills, science self-efficacy beliefs and science interest. International Journal of Science Education, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2025.2460050

Urdanivia Alarcon, D. A., Talavera-Mendoza, F., Rucano Paucar, F. H., Cayani Caceres, K. S., & Machaca Viza, R. (2023a). Science and inquiry-based teaching and learning: a systematic review. Frontiers in Education, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1170487

Urdanivia Alarcon, D. A., Talavera-Mendoza, F., Rucano Paucar, F. H., Cayani Caceres, K. S., & Machaca Viza, R. (2023b). Science and inquiry-based teaching and learning: a systematic review. Frontiers in Education, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1170487

Utami, S. S., Aisyah, R. S. S., & Affifah, I. (2022). Application of the Argument-Driven Inquiry Learning Model in Stimulating Students’ Scientific Argumentation Skills on Acid-Base Material. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia Indonesia, 6(1), 38–45. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpk.v6i1.39162

Wess, R., Priemer, B., & Parchmann, I. (2023). Professional development programs to improve science teachers’ skills in the facilitation of argumentation in science classroom—a systematic review. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 5(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-023-00076-3

Zaida Ilma, A., & Kuswanto, H. (2025). Toward student’s scientific literacy in science learning: A systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis. Revista Mexicana de Física E, 22(2 Jul-Dec). https://doi.org/10.31349/RevMexFisE.22.020222

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24014/idj.v8i3.38594