Symbolism and Islamic Values in Students’ Reog Stage at Muharam Celebration
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24014/jdr.v31i2.11255Keywords:
Symbols, meanings, signs, MuharamAbstract
Signs, symbols, and meanings are important elements in human interaction. This research aims to reveal how the signs, symbols, and meanings related and can be used to describe the relationship among students in Reog culture staging. The results of the study showed that interaction between muslim’s players on the Reog stage forms togetherness, soul sacrifice, struggle, and friendship. This research of signs, symbols, and meanings in the relationship among Islamic students in Reog staging can be obtained that communication is the process of tagging and signification on signs to obtain a mutual understanding of meaning that involves human creativity in the production, exchange, and meaning process of the signs and symbols. The islamic values of students in Reog Muharam stage are leadership, togetherness, mutual respect and the means of silaturrahmi of muslim’s community in Ponorogo.References
Block, E. (2013). A Culturalist Approach to the Concept of the Mediatization of Politics: The Age of ‘Media Hegemony’. Communication Theory, 23 (3), 259–78. Retrieved https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12016.
Bourdon, J. (2018). The Case for the Technological Comparison in Communication History. Communication Theory, 28 (1), 89–109. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtx001.
Fuchs, C. (2019). Henri Lefebvre’s Theory of the Production of Space and the Critical Theory of Communication. Communication Theory, 29 (2), 129–50. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qty025.
Gallant, A. (2014). Symbolic Interactions and the Development of Women Leaders in Higher Education: Symbolic Interactions and Development of Women Leaders In HE. Gender, Work & Organization, 21 (3), 203–16. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12030.
Hume, W.M & Qi, Z. (2014). Symbolic Interactionism. The International Encyclopedia of Communication. Retrived from https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118517390.wbetc100
Istikharotulkhoirunnisa. (2019). Persepsi Masyarakat Terhadap Tradisi Ritual Grebeg Suro Di Ponorogo. https://www.kompasiana.com /istikharotulkhoirunnisa/ 5cbfdd f2cc528307cc69d232/
Jenkins, D. H. (1961). Prediction in Interpersonal Communication. Journal of Communication, 11 (3), 129–35. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1961.tb00342.x.
Jensen, K. B. (2013). Definitive and Sensitizing Conceptualizations of Mediatization. Communication Theory, 23(3), 203-222. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12014
Kencanasari, L.S. (2019). Warok Dalam Sejarah Kesenian Reog Ponorogo (Warok in the History of Art Reog Ponorogo). Jurnal Filsafat 19 (2). 180-198. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.22146/jf.3446
Lyne, J. (2008). Rhetoric and Semiotics. The International Encyclopedia of Communication, Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405186407.wbiecr077
Mukarromah, S. & Devi, S. (2012), Mobilisasi Massa Partai melalui Seni Pertunjukan Reog di Ponorogo tahun 1950-1980, Jurnal Verleden 1(1) Retrieved from http://journal.unair.ac.id/downloadfull/VERLEDEN4259-810f9a2e3dfullabstract.pdf
Pearce, W.B & Sharp, S.M (1973). Self‐Disclosing Communication. The International Encyclopedia of Communication. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1973.tb00958.x
Ritchie, L. D & Leslie T. G. (1989). Communication as a Symbolic Activity. Journal of Communication, 39 (4), 121–26. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1989.tb01056.x.
Sigismondi, P. (2018). Exploring Translation Gaps: The Untranslatability and Global Diffusion of ‘Cool’. Communication Theory, 28 (3), 292–310. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtx007.
Supriadi, W. (2015). Regenerasi Seniman Reog Ponorogo untuk Mendukung Revitalisasi Seni Pertunjukan Tradisional dan Menunjang Pembangunan Industri Kreatif. Cakra Wisata, 16 (1), 13-22. Retrieved from https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/cakra-wisata/article/view/34468/22623
Stewart, D. K. (1966). Signs, Symbols, and Meaning. Journal of Communication, 16 (1), 4–9. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1966.tb00012.x.
Thomas, P. N. (2020), The Imperialism of Categories: Concepts and Contexts in Communication for Social Change. Communication Theory, 30(4), 388-406. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtz026
Wee, L. (2006). The Semiotics of Language Ideologies in Singapore1. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 10 (3), 344–61. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-6441.2006.00331.x.
