Orisinalitas: Konsep, Penilaian, dan Cara Menunjukkannya pada Bidang Geometri

Memen Permata Azmi

doi:10.24014/juring.v7i2.31354

Orisinalitas: Konsep, Penilaian, dan Cara Menunjukkannya pada Bidang Geometri

Memen Permata Azmi

Abstract

Orisinalitas menjadi sangat penting untuk dikaji karena diperlukan dalam menghadapi berbagai masalah yang hadir karena perbedaan sudut pandang, mengatasi kehidupan modern, penemuan ilmiah, dan masalah tidak rutin. Namun saat ini, konsep dan penilaian orisinalitas masih berbeda-beda antara para ahli, sehingga diperlukan kajian yang mendalam mengenai berbagai sudut pandang mengenai orisinalitas. Artikel ini merupakan studi literatur yang berasal dari berbagai sumber artikel jurnal dan buku sehingga diperoleh deskripsi yang mendalam mengenai konsep dan penilaian orisinalitas dari berbagai perspektif, serta cara mengungkapkan orisinalitas dalam bidang geometri. Hasil studi literatur ini menunjukkan bahwa terdapat empat sudut pandang dalam memaknai orisinalitas yaitu orisinalitas mutlak, relatif, komparatif, dan modifikasi. Penilaian orisinalitas dapat dilakukan menggunakan sudut pandang objektif dan subjektif. Untuk mengungkapkan orisinalitas dalam bidang geometri diperlukan masalah terbuka, terhubung, terintegrasi, menantang, dan abstrak.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Acar, S., Burnett, C., & Cabra, J. F. (2017). Ingredients of Creativity: Originality and More. Creativity Research Journal, 29(2), 133–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2017.1302776

Alajami, A. (2020). Beyond originality in scientific research: Considering relations among originality, novelty, and ecological thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 38, 100723.

Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(2), 357–376. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.45.2.357

Bicer, A. (2021). Multiple representations and mathematical creativity. Thinking skills and creativity, 42, 100960.

Bicer, A., Lee, Y., Perihan, C., Capraro, M. M., & Capraro, R. M. (2020). Considering mathematical creative self-efficacy with problem posing as a measure of mathematical creativity. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 105(3), 457–485. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-020-09995-8

Brookhart, S. M. (2010). How to assess higher-order thinking skills in your classroom. Ascd. https://books.google.com/books?hl=id&lr=&id=AFIxeGsV6SMC&oi=fnd&pg=PA1&dq=Brookhart+(2010)&ots=W9anXyb904&sig=PJT8znVkW8CkaKA6cndi9Nry7yY

Chassell, L. M. (1916). Tests for originality. Journal of educational psychology, 7(6), 317.

Clements, D. H. (2003). Learning and Teaching Measurement (2003 Yearbook). ERIC. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ed501936

Cotter, K. N., Ivcevic, Z., & Moeller, J. (2020). Person-oriented profiles of originality and fluency in divergent thinking responses. Journal of Research in Personality, 86, 103941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2020.103941

Dean, D. L., Hender, J., Rodgers, T., & Santanen, E. (2006). Identifying good ideas: Constructs and scales for idea evaluation. Journal of Association for Information Systems, 7(10), 646–699.

Denney, A. S., & Tewksbury, R. (2013). How to Write a Literature Review. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 24(2), 218–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511253.2012.730617

Dumas, D., & Dunbar, K. N. (2014). Understanding Fluency and Originality: A latent variable perspective. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 14, 56–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2014.09.003

Faelasofi, R. (2017). Identifikasi kemampuan berpikir kreatif matematika pokok bahasan peluang. JURNAL e-DuMath, 3(2). http://ejournal.umpri.ac.id/index.php/edumath/article/view/460

Fensham, P. J., & Bellocchi, A. (2013). Higher order thinking in chemistry curriculum and its assessment. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 10, 250–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2013.06.003

Finn, J. (2005). Getting a PhD: An action plan to help manage your research, your supervisor and your project. Routledge. https://api.taylorfrancis.com/content/books/mono/download?identifierName=doi&identifierValue=10.4324/9780203023457&type=googlepdf

Fortes, E. C., & Andrade, R. R. (2019). Mathematical Creativity in Solving Non-Routine Problems. The Normal Lights, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.56278/tnl.v13i1.1237

Forthmann, B., Bürkner, P.-C., Szardenings, C., Benedek, M., & Holling, H. (2019). A New Perspective on the Multidimensionality of Divergent Thinking Tasks. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 985. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00985

Gie, T. (2003). Teknik-teknik Berpikir Kreatif. Yogyakarta: Multi Pressindo.

Gordon, M. (2007). What makes interdisciplinary research original? Integrative scholarship reconsidered. Oxford Review of Education, 33(2), 195–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054980701259642

Hadar, L. L., & Tirosh, M. (2019). Creative thinking in mathematics curriculum: An analytic framework. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 33, 100585.

Hart, C. (2018). Doing a literature review: Releasing the research imagination. https://www.torrossa.com/gs/resourceProxy?an=5019541&publisher=FZ7200

Hernandez, N. V., Schmidt, L. C., & Okudan, G. E. (2013). Systematic ideation effectiveness study of TRIZ. Journal of Mechanical Design, 135(10), 101009.

Hidajat, F. A. (2021). Students Creative Thinking Profile as a High Order Thinking in the Improvement of Mathematics Learning. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(3), 1247–1258. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.10.3.1247

Jones, K. (2003). Issues in the teaching and learning of geometry. Dalam Aspects of teaching secondary mathematics (hlm. 137–155). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9780203165874-14/issues-teaching-learning-geometry-keith-jones

Kennedy, L. M., Tipps, S., & Johnson, A. (2008). Guiding children’s learning of mathematics (11th ed). Thomson/Wadsworth.

Krapež, K. (2013). The (Un) Originality of Scientific Papers–An Analysis of Professional Quality Standards. Management, Knowledge, and Learning International Conference. Make Learn, Zadar. https://toknowpress.net/ISBN/978-961-6914-02-4/papers/ML13-342.pdf

Levenson, E. S. (2022). Exploring the relationship between teachers’ values and their choice of tasks: The case of occasioning mathematical creativity. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 109(3), 469–489. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-10101-9

Molad, O., Levenson, E. S., & Levy, S. (2020). Individual and group mathematical creativity among post–high school students. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 104(2), 201–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-020-09952-5

Ndiung, S., Jehadus, E., & Apsari, R. A. (2021). The Effect of Treffinger Creative Learning Model with the Use RME Principles on Creative Thinking Skill and Mathematics Learning Outcome. International Journal of Instruction, 14(2), 873–888.

Nguyễn, T. M. T., & Nguyễn, T. T. L. (2017). Influence of explicit higher-order thinking skills instruction on students’ learning of linguistics. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 26, 113–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.10.004

Purwosetiyono, F. X. D., Sa’diajah, C., Hidayanto, E., & Chandra, T. D. (2020). The Originality Idea of Prospective Teacher’s in Mathematics Problem Solving. Test Engineering & Management, 83.

Reiter-Palmon, R., Forthmann, B., & Barbot, B. (2019). Scoring divergent thinking tests: A review and systematic framework. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 13(2), 144–152. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000227

Runco, M. A., & Acar, S. (2012). Divergent Thinking as an Indicator of Creative Potential. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 66–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.652929

Runco, M. A., & Charles, R. E. (1993). Judgments of originality and appropriateness as predictors of creativity. Personality and Individual Differences, 15(5), 537–546. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(93)90337-3

Runco, M. A., & Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The Standard Definition of Creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 92–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.650092

Runco, M. A., & Mraz, W. (1992). Scoring Divergent Thinking Tests Using Total Ideational Output and a Creativity Index. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52(1), 213–221. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316449205200126

Silvia, P. J. (2011). Subjective scoring of divergent thinking: Examining the reliability of unusual uses, instances, and consequences tasks. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 6(1), 24–30.

Silvia, P. J., Martin, C., & Nusbaum, E. C. (2009). A snapshot of creativity: Evaluating a quick and simple method for assessing divergent thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 4(2), 79–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2009.06.005

Siswono, T. Y. E. (2011). Level of student’s creative thinking in classroom mathematics. Educational Research and Reviews, 6(7), 548.

Siswono, T. Y. E. (2018). Pembelajaran Matematika Berbasis Pengajuan dan Pemecahan Masalah. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Sriraman, B. (2004). The Characteristics of Mathematical Creativity. The Mathematics Educator, 14(1), 19–34.

Sriraman, B., Haavold, P., & Lee, K. (2013). Mathematical creativity and giftedness: A commentary on and review of theory, new operational views, and ways forward. ZDM, 45(2), 215–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-013-0494-6

Sternberg, R. J. (2006). The nature of creativity. Creativity research journal, 18(1), 87.

Sternberg, R. J., & Collaborators, R. P. (2006). The Rainbow Project: Enhancing the SAT through assessments of analytical, practical, and creative skills. Intelligence, 34(4), 321–350.

Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1992). Creativity: Its Nature and Assessment. School Psychology International, 13(3), 243–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034392133004

Subanji, S., Nusantara, T., Rahmatina, D., & Purnomo, H. (2021). The Statistical Creative Framework in Descriptive Statistics Activities. International Journal of Instruction, 14(2), 591–608. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14233a

Syahrin, A., Dawud, Suwignyo, H., & Priyatni, E. T. (2019). Creative Thinking Patterns In Student‘s Scientific Works. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 19(81), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2019.81.2

Torrance, E. P. (1972). Predictive Validity of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking*. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 6(4), 236–262. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.1972.tb00936.x

VandenBos, G. R. (2007). APA dictionary of psychology. American Psychological Association. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2006-11044-000

Vijayaratnam, P. (2012). Developing Higher Order Thinking Skills and Team Commitment via Group Problem Solving: A Bridge to the Real World. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 66, 53–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.247

Wilson, R. C., Guilford, J. P., & Christensen, P. R. (1953). The measurement of individual differences in originality. Psychological bulletin, 50(5), 362.

Zed, M. (2008). Metode penelitian kepustakaan. Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia. https://books.google.com/books?hl=id&lr=&id=zG9sDAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA78&dq=Zed,+M.+(2014).+Metode+Penelitian+Kepustakaan.+Jakarta:+Yayasan+Pustaka+Obor+Indonesi&ots=P98ljRJQ-x&sig=saUwYotX8I-Wxqhk7anGUb6SsI4

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24014/juring.v7i2.31354