Literature Review: Trend Penerapan MCDM Metode ELECTRE, EDAS dan ARAS

Indah Sasmita, Rice Novita, Nesdi Evrilayan Rozanda, Muhammad Luthfi Hamzah

Abstract


Pengambilan keputusan multi-criteria (MCDM) menunjukkan tujuan dari pengambilan keputusan beberapa kriteria yang saling bertentangan. Pengambilan keputusan multi-criteria merupakan salah satu topik permasalahan yang paling banyak ditangangani oleh para peneliti. Sekitar 120 makalah tentang pengambilan keputusan multi-criteria pada metode ELECTRE, EDAS dan ARAS telah diidentifikasi melalui serangkaian pertanyaan dan diklasifikasikan berdasarkan tahun 2015 sampai 2020. Penggunaan metode MCDM (ELECTRE, EDAS ARAS) terkait dengan bidang tertentu (Ilmu Keputusan, Ilmu Komputer, Seni dan humaniora) diidentifikasi. Hasilnya menunjukkan bahwa metode ELECTRE, EDAS dan ARAS disukai untuk permasalahan ilmu keputusan dengan persentase 20%, 35%, 24% dan energi dengan persentase 12%, 14%, 16%. Selanjutnya, hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa metode ELECTRE merupakan metode yang paling trend dikalangan peneliti dengan mengacu pada banyaknya kasus penerapan multi-criteria.


Full Text:

PDF

References


K. Govindan and M. B. Jepsen, “ELECTRE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications,” Eur. J. Oper. Res., vol. 250, no. 1, pp. 1–29, 2016.

E. Triantaphyllou, B. Shu, S. N. Sanchez, and T. Ray, “EEEE1.pdf,” Electronics, vol. 15, pp. 175–186, 1998.

M. Behzadian, S. Khanmohammadi Otaghsara, M. Yazdani, and J. Ignatius, “A state-of the-art survey of TOPSIS applications,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 39, no. 17, pp. 13051–13069, 2012.

M. Behzadian, R. B. Kazemzadeh, A. Albadvi, and M. Aghdasi, “PROMETHEE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications,” Eur. J. Oper. Res., vol. 200, no. 1, pp. 198–215, 2010.

X. Wang and E. Triantaphyllou, “Ranking irregularities when evaluating alternatives by using some ELECTRE methods,” Omega, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 45–63, 2008.

A. Praba, R. Pinem, T. Handayani, and L. M. Huizen, “Komparasi Metode ELECTRE, SMART dan ARAS Dalam Penentuan Prioritas RENAKSI Pasca Bencana Alam,” J. RESTI (Rekayasa Sist. dan Teknol. Informasi), vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 109–116, 2020.

E. K. Zavadskas, Ž. Stević, Z. Turskis, and M. Tomašević, “A novel extended EDAS in Minkowski space (EDAS-M) method for evaluating autonomous vehicles,” Stud. Informatics Control, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 255–264, 2019.

A. Mostafaeipour, S. J. Hosseini Dehshiri, and S. S. Hosseini Dehshiri, “Ranking locations for producing hydrogen using geothermal energy in Afghanistan,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, vol. 45, no. 32, pp. 15924–15940, 2020.

M. K. Ghorabaee, E. K. Zavadskas, L. Olfat, and Z. Turskis, “Multi-Criteria Inventory Classification Using a New Method of Evaluation Based on Distance from Average Solution (EDAS),” Inform., vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 435–451, 2015.

S. S. Goswami and D. K. Behera, “Implementation of ENTROPY-ARAS decision making methodology in the selection of best engineering materials,” Mater. Today Proc., vol. 38, no. xxxx, pp. 2256–2262, 2020.

M. Aruldoss, “A Survey on Multi Criteria Decision Making Methods and Its Applications,” Am. J. Inf. Syst., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 31–43, 2013.

W. K. M. Brauers and E. K. Zavadskas, “Robustness of MULTIMOORA: A method for multi-objective optimization,” Informatica, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 1–25, 2012.

J. Rezaei, “Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method,” Omega (United Kingdom), vol. 53, pp. 49–57, 2015.

J. R. Figueira, S. Greco, B. Roy, and R. Słowiński, “An Overview of ELECTRE Methods and their Recent Extensions,” J. Multi-Criteria Decis. Anal., vol. 20, no. 1–2, pp. 61–85, 2013.

S. H. Zanakis, A. Solomon, N. Wishart, and S. Dublish, “Multi-attribute decision making: A simulation comparison of select methods,” Eur. J. Oper. Res., vol. 107, no. 3, pp. 507–529, 1998.

E. D. Comaniţă et al., “Challenges and oportunities in green plastics: An assessment using the electre decision-aid method,” Environ. Eng. Manag. J., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 689–702, 2015.

T. Singh, P. Pattnaik, C. I. Pruncu, A. Tiwari, and G. Fekete, “Selection of natural fibers based brake friction composites using hybrid ELECTRE-entropy optimization technique,” Polym. Test., vol. 89, no. January, 2020.

P. Zhang, H. Yao, C. Qiu, and Y. Liu, “Virtual network embedding using node multiple metrics based on simplified electre method,” IEEE Access, vol. 6, pp. 37314–37327, 2018.

H. S. Kilic, A. E. Demirci, and D. Delen, “An integrated decision analysis methodology based on IF-DEMATEL and IF-ELECTRE for personnel selection,” Decis. Support Syst., vol. 137, no. July, p. 113360, 2020.

X. Li, Y. Ju, D. Ju, W. Zhang, P. Dong, and A. Wang, “Multi-attribute group decision making method based on EDAS under picture fuzzy environment,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 141179–141192, 2019.

F. Uysal and N. Koc, “Reverse logistics and application of ARAS method,” Pressacademia, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 178–185, 2017.

A. Ulutaş, “Sewing Machine Selection for a Textile Workshop by Using EDAS Method.”

B. D. Rouyendegh and T. E. Erkan, “An application of the Fuzzy ELECTRE method for academic staff selection,” Hum. Factors Ergon. Manuf., vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 107–115, 2013.

L. Han and C. Wei, “An Extended EDAS Method for Multicriteria Decision-Making Based on Multivalued Neutrosophic Sets,” Complexity, vol. 2020, 2020.

M. Yazdani, A. E. Torkayesh, E. D. Santibanez-Gonzalez, and S. K. Otaghsara, “Evaluation of renewable energy resources using integrated Shannon Entropy—EDAS model,” Sustain. Oper. Comput., vol. 1, no. December, pp. 35–42, 2020.

T. He, “A NOVEL EDAS BASED METHOD FOR MULTIPLE,” vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 1125–1138, 2020.

F. Ecer, “An integrated fuzzy AHP and ARAS model to evaluate mobile banking services,” Technol. Econ. Dev. Econ., vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 670–695, 2018.

M. Zamani, A. Rabbani, A. Yazdani-Chamzini, and Z. Turskis, “An integrated model for extending brand based on fuzzy ARAS and ANP methods,” J. Bus. Econ. Manag., vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 403–423, 2014.

M. Iordache, D. Schitea, M. Deveci, İ. Z. Akyurt, and I. Iordache, “An integrated ARAS and interval type-2 hesitant fuzzy sets method for underground site selection: Seasonal hydrogen storage in salt caverns,” J. Pet. Sci. Eng., vol. 175, no. January, pp. 1088–1098, 2019.

Y. Bahrami, H. Hassani, and A. Maghsoudi, “BWM-ARAS: A new hybrid MCDM method for Cu prospectivity mapping in the Abhar area, NW Iran,” Spat. Stat., vol. 33, 2019.

D. Stanujkic, “Extension of the ARAS method for decision-making problems with interval-valued triangular fuzzy numbers,” Inform., vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 335–355, 2015.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24014/coreit.v7i1.13088

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Creative Commons License  site stats  
Jurnal CoreIT by http://ejournal.uin-suska.ac.id/index.php/coreit/ is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.