Pemikiran Tafsir Al-Qur’an Kontemporer: Studi Komparatif Metode Tafsir Amīn Al-Khūlī dan Nashr Hamīd Abū Zayd
Abstract
This paper explains the dynamics of contemporary Qur'anic exegesis by comparing the views of Amīn al-Khūlī and Nashr Hamīd AbūZayd. These two figures are known as reformers in the field of Qur'anic interpretation, leaning towards linguistic and literary exegesis. The purpose of this comparison is to identify the similarities and differences between these two figures, who share a teacher-student scholarly lineage. This research is a library study, using a comparative study method. The results of this research show that two important figures in this field, Amīn al-Khūlī, and Nashr Hamīd Abū Zayd, offer different approaches to understanding the Qur'an. Amīn al-Khūlī, influenced by Western literary analysis methods, emphasizes the use of literary tools to interpret the Qur'an, focusing on linguistic structure, rhetorical figures, and literary composition to delve into the literal and implicit meanings of the verses. In contrast, Nashr Hamīd Abū Zayd employs a broader hermeneutical approach, including analysis of the social, cultural, and historical context during the Qur'an's revelation. Abū Zayd emphasizes the use of classical Arabic to uncover hidden and implicit meanings, as well as how metaphors and symbolism in the sacred text convey divine messages. This comparative study aims to deepen our understanding of various methodological approaches in Qur'anic interpretation and to explore significant similarities and differences between Amīn al-Khūlī's and Nashr Hamīd Abū Zayd's methods in addressing the complex challenges of the modern era.
Abstrak: Tulisan ini menjelaskan tentang dinamika pemikiran tafsir Al-Qur’an kontemporer dengan membandingkan pandangan Amīn al-Khūlīdan Nashr Hamīd Abū Zayd. Kedua tokoh ini dikenal sebagai pembaharu di bidang tafsir Al-Qur’an dengan corak penafsiran yang lebih condong pada penafsiran linguistik/bahasa dan sastra. Tujuan komparasi ini adalah untuk mengidentifikasi persamaan dan perbedaan dari kedua tokoh tersebut yang notabene memiliki silsilah keilmuan guru murid. Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian kepustakaan, dengan menggunakan metode studi komparatif. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa, dua tokoh penting dalam bidang ini, Amīn al-Khūlī dan Nashr Hamīd Abū Zayd, menawarkan pendekatan berbeda dalam memahami Al-Qur’an. Amīn al-Khūlī, terpengaruh oleh metode analisis sastra Barat, menekankan penggunaan alat-alat sastra untuk menafsirkan Al-Qur’an, dengan fokus pada struktur bahasa, figur retoris, dan komposisi sastra untuk mendalami makna literal dan implisit ayat-ayat. Sebaliknya, Nashr Hamīd Abū Zayd menggunakan pendekatan hermeneutika yang lebih luas, mencakup analisis konteks sosial, budaya, dan historis saat Al-Qur’an diturunkan. Abū Zayd menekankan penggunaan bahasa Arab klasik untuk mengungkap makna tersembunyi dan implisit, serta bagaimana metafora dan simbolisme dalam teks suci menyampaikan pesan ilahi. Studi komparatif ini bertujuan untuk memperdalam pemahaman kita terhadap berbagai pendekatan metodologis dalam penafsiran Al-Qur’an, serta menggali persamaan dan perbedaan signifikan antara metode Amīn al-Khūlī dan Nashr Hamīd Abū Zayd dalam menghadapi tantangan zaman modern yang kompleks.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abu Zayd, N.H. “Mafhūm Al-Naṣṣ: Dirāsah Fī ʿUlūm Al-Qur’ān.” Beirut: Al-Markaz Al-Thaqāfī Al-‘Arabī., 1993.
Abū Zayd, Nashr Hamīd. “Interpretation in Modern Islamic Thought: The Theory of Meaning in Abu Zayd.” Journal of Qur’anic Studies 6, no. 2 (1994): 215-231.
Al-Andalusi, ’Abd al-Haqq Ibn Abī Bakr Gālib Ibn ‘Aṭiyyah al-Garnati. “Muharrar Al-Wajīz Fī Al-Tafsīr Al-Kitāb Al-‘Azīz.” Dar Ihya’ Al-Turath Al-Arabi: Beirut, Lebanon, 1983.
Al-Harbar, Muhammad Jalaluddin. “Nashr Hamid Abu Zayd: A Biography.” Dar Al-Mawakif, 2023.
Al-Khatib, Abdullah. “Amin Al-Khuli: Literary Critic and Reformis.” Routledge, 2022.
Al-Khūlī, A. “Manāhij Al-Tafsīr: Dirāsah Qur’āniyyah.” Cairo: Dār Al-Ma’ārif, 1995.
———. “Tajālidāt Fī L-Tafsīr Al-Qur’ānī.” Cairo: Dār Al-Ma’ārif, 1998.
Al-Khuli, Amin, and Nashr Hamid Abu Zayd. “Metode Tafsir Sastra Ter. Khairon Nahdiyyin.” Yogyakrta: Adab Press, 2004.
Al-Suyuti, Jalaluddin. “Al-Dūr Al-Manṭur Fī Al-Tafsīr.” Cairo: Dar Al-Ihya Al-Kutub Al-Arabiyya, 1930.
Al-Tabari, Ibn Jarir. “Jami’al-Bayan Fi Tafsir Al-Qur’an.” Beirut: Dar Al-Fikr, 1978.
Alfian, Muhammad. “Hermeneutika Nasr Hamid Abu Zayd.” Islamika: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman 18, no. 01 (2018): 25–38.
Alwan, Hanaa. “Modern Approaches to Quranic Exegesis: Amin Al-Khuli’s Methodology.” Oxford University Press, 2023.
Aminullah, Muhammad. “Hermeneutika Dan Linguistik Perspektif Metode Tafsir Sastra Amin Al-Khuli.” El-Hikam 9, no. 2 (2016): 325–48.
Anggraini, Sulistiya Ayu. “Aplikasi Metode Hermeneutika Nashr Hamid Abu Zayd Tentang Poligami Dalam Surah Al-Nisa Ayat 3.” Skripsi UIN Sunan Ampel, 2018.
Farida, Umma. “Pemikiran Dan Metode Tafsir Al-Qur’an Kontemporer.” Yogyakarta: Idea Press, 2010.
Fauzan, Ahmad. “Teks Al-Qur’an Dalam Pandangan Nashr Hamid Abu Zayd.” Kalimah: Jurnal Studi Agama Dan Pemikiran Islam 13, no. 1 (2015): 71–92.
Ghufron, Achmad. “Metode Persilangan Al-Qur’an Dengan Sastra Oleh Amin Al-Khuli.” Al-Thiqah: Jurnal Ilmu Keislaman 2, no. 01 (2019): 82–105.
Hadi, Abd. “Metodologi Tafsir Al Quran Dari Masa Klasik Sampai Masa Kontemporer.” Griya Media, 2021.
Hirsch, Eric Donald. Validity in Interpretation. Vol. 260. Yale University Press, 1967.
Ichwan, Moch Nur. “Meretas Kesarjanaan Kritis Al-Qur’an, Teori Hermeneutika Nasr Abu Zayd.” Jakarta: Teraju, 2003.
Ilyas, Yunahar. “Kuliah Ulumul Qur’an.” Yogyakarta: ITQAN Publishing, 2013.
Jamil, Husnaini. “PENDEKATAN KRITIK SASTRA TERHADAP AL-QUR’AN PERSPEKTIF AMIN AL-KHULI.” MPBA UIN Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang, 2021, 1–23.
MAIMUN, MUHAMMAD. “PENAFSIRAN AYAT-AYAT AMSAL AL-QURAN DENGAN PENDEKATAN HERMENEUTIK SASTRA.” UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA, 2005.
Martanti, B Q Hadia. “Metodologi Pembaharuan Pemikiran Islam Kontemporer Studi Komparatif Metodologi Muhammad Syahrur Dan Nashr Hamid Abu Zaid.” El_Huda, IAI Qomarul Huda Bagu NTB 10, no. 2 (2019): 87–105.
Mofid, Moh, and Mohammad Zainal Hamdy. “Dekontruksi Pendekatan Kritik Sastra Terhadap Al-Quran Perspektif Amin Al-Khuli.” Al-Irfan: Journal of Arabic Literature and Islamic Studies 4, no. 2 (2021): 238–53.
Mufid, Fathul. “Pendekatan Filsafat Hermeneutika Dalam Penafsiran Al-Quran: Transformasi Global Tafsir Al-Quran.” ULUL ALBAB Jurnal Studi Islam 12, no. 1 (2011): 31–49.
Nasution, Harun. “Teologi Islam: Aliran-Aliran Sejarah Analisa Perbandingan.” Jakarta: UII Perss, 2010.
Neuwirth, Angelika. “Qur’an and History–a Disputed Relationship. Some Reflections on Qur’anic History and History in the Qur’an.” Journal of Qur’anic Studies 5, no. 1 (2003): 1–18.
Ramadhani, Wali. “Amin Al-Khuli Dan Metode Tafsir Sastrawi Atas Al-Qur’an.” Jurnal At-Tibyan: Jurnal Ilmu Alqur’an Dan Tafsir 2, no. 1 (2017): 1–14.
Rippin, Andrew. “The Literary Approach to the Qur’an in Contemporary Islamic Scholarship.” Journal of Qur’anic Studies 6, no. 1 (2004): 1–18.
Rohmah, Lailatur. “HERMENEUTIKA AL-QUR’AN: Studi Atas Metode Penafsiran Nasr Hamid Abu Zaid (Between Meaning and Significance)(Literary Hermeneutics).” Hikmah: Journal of Islamic Studies 12, no. 2 (2017): 223–44.
Saeed, Abdullah. “The Qur’an and Its Interpreters: The House of Islam and the Crescent of Integration.” Journal of Qur’anic Studies, 2010.
Shihab, M Quraish. Kaidah Tafsir; Syarat, Ketentuan Dan Aturan Yang Patut Anda Ketahui Dalam Memahami Ayat-Ayat Al-Qur’an. Lentera Hati Group, 2013.
Tohir, Muhammad. “Al-Qur’an Dalam Pandangan Hermeneutika Nasr Hamd Abu Zayd.” Al-Thiqah: Jurnal Ilmu Keislaman 2, no. 01 (2019): 1–26.
Webb, Suhaib. “Reading the Qur’an as Literature: Amin Al-Khuli’s Approach and Its Implications.” American Journal of Islamic Social Sciences, 2020.
Wijaya, Aksin. “Melihat Arah Baru Studi Ulumul Al-Qur’an; Memburu Pesan Tuhan Dibalik Fenomena Budaya.” Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2020.
Zaini, Zaini. “The Method Of Interpretation Of Syeh Muhammad Abduh And Syeh Rasyid Ridha In The Book Tafsir Al Manar.” Al-Bayan: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur’an Dan Hadist 2, no. 1 (2019): 1–17.
Zaman, Muhammad Qasim. Modern Islamic Thought in a Radical Age: Religious Authority and Internal Criticism. Cambridge University Press, 2012.
Zayd, Naṣr Ḥāmid Abū. “Reformation of Islamic Thought: A Critical Historical Analysis” 10 (2006).
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24014/alqudwah.v2i1.29087
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Editorial Office Board :
The Qur'anic and Tafsir Science Study Program and the Hadith Science Study Program. Faculty of Ushuluddin State Islamic University Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau.
H.R. Soebrantas Street No. 155 KM 18, Simpang Baru Panam, Pekanbaru 28293 PO.Box. 1004 Telp. 0761-562051 Fax. 0761-562051 Web: https://fush.uin-suska.ac.id/
https://ejournal.uin-suska.ac.id/index.php/alqudwah/index
Al-Qudwah by https://ejournal.uin-suska.ac.id/index.php/alqudwah/index is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.