Pemikiran Tafsir Al-Qur’an Kontemporer: Studi Komparatif Metode Tafsir Amīn Al-Khūlī dan Nashr Hamīd Abū Zayd
Abstract
This paper discusses the dynamics of contemporary Qur'anic exegesis by comparing the views of Amīn al-Khūlī and Nashr Hamīd AbūZayd. Both figures are known as reformers in the field of Qur'anic exegesis, with an approach leaning towards linguistic/language and literary interpretation. The purpose of this comparison is to identify the similarities and differences between the two figures, who notably share a teacher-student intellectual lineage. This study is a library research type, utilizing a comparative study method. The results of this study show that the two important figures in this field, Amīn al-Khūlī and Nashr Hamīd Abū Zayd, offer different approaches to understanding the Qur'an. Amīn al-Khūlī, influenced by Western literary analysis methods, emphasizes the use of literary tools to interpret the Qur'an, focusing on language structure, rhetorical figures, and literary composition to explore the literal and implicit meanings of the verses. In contrast, Nashr Hamīd Abū Zayd employs a broader hermeneutic approach, encompassing social, cultural, and historical context analysis when the Qur'an was revealed. Abū Zayd emphasizes the use of classical Arabic to uncover hidden and implicit meanings, as well as how metaphors and symbolism in the sacred text convey divine messages. This comparative study aims to deepen our understanding of the various methodological approaches in Qur'anic exegesis, as well as explore the significant similarities and differences between the methods of Amīn al-Khūlī and Nashr Hamīd Abū Zayd in addressing the challenges of the modern era.
Abstrak: Tulisan ini menjelaskan tentang dinamika pemikiran tafsir Al-Qur’an kontemporer dengan membandingkan pandangan Amīn al-Khūlīdan Nashr Hamīd Abū Zayd. Kedua tokoh ini dikenal sebagai pembaharu di bidang tafsir Al-Qur’an dengan corak penafsiran yang lebih condong pada penafsiran linguistik/bahasa dan sastra. Tujuan komparasi ini adalah untuk mengidentifikasi persamaan dan perbedaan dari kedua tokoh tersebut yang notabene memiliki silsilah keilmuan guru-murid. Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian kepustakaan, dengan menggunakan metode studi komparatif. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa, dua tokoh penting dalam bidang ini, Amīn al-Khūlī dan Nashr Hamīd Abū Zayd, menawarkan pendekatan berbeda dalam memahami Al-Qur’an. Amīn al-Khūlī, terpengaruh oleh metode analisis sastra Barat, menekankan penggunaan alat-alat sastra untuk menafsirkan Al-Qur’an, dengan fokus pada struktur bahasa, figur retoris, dan komposisi sastra untuk mendalami makna literal dan implisit ayat-ayat. Sebaliknya, Nashr Hamīd Abū Zayd menggunakan pendekatan hermeneutika yang lebih luas, mencakup analisis konteks sosial, budaya, dan historis saat Al-Qur’an diturunkan. Abū Zayd menekankan penggunaan bahasa Arab klasik untuk mengungkap makna tersembunyi dan implisit, serta bagaimana metafora dan simbolisme dalam teks suci menyampaikan pesan ilahi. Studi komparatif ini bertujuan untuk memperdalam pemahaman kita terhadap berbagai pendekatan metodologis dalam penafsiran Al-Qur’an, serta menggali persamaan dan perbedaan signifikan antara metode Amīn al-Khūlī dan Nashr Hamīd Abū Zayd dalam menghadapi tantangan zaman modern yang kompleks.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abu Zayd, N.H. “Mafhūm Al-Naṣṣ: Dirāsah fī ʿUlūm Al-Qur’ān.” Beirut: Al-Markaz Al-Thaqāfī Al-‘Arabī., 1993.
Abū Zayd, Nashr Hamīd. “Interpretation in Modern Islamic Thought: the Theory of Meaning in Abu Zayd.” Journal of Qur’anic Studies 6, no. 2 (1994): 215-231.
Al-Andalusi, ’Abd al-Haqq Ibn Abī Bakr Gālib Ibn ‘Aṭiyyah al-Garnati. “Muharrar Al-Wajīz Fī Al-Tafsīr Al-Kitāb Al-‘Azīz.” Dar Ihya’ Al-Turath Al-Arabi: Beirut, Lebanon, 1983.
Al-Harbar, Muhammad Jalaluddin. “Nashr Hamid Abu Zayd: A Biography.” Dar Al-Mawakif, 2023.
Al-Khatib, Abdullah. “Amin Al-Khuli: Literary Critic and Reformis.” Routledge, 2022.
Al-Khūlī, A. “Manāhij Al-Tafsīr: Dirāsah Qur’āniyyah.” Cairo: Dār Al-Ma’ārif, 1995.
———. “Tajālidāt Fī L-Tafsīr Al-Qur’ānī.” Cairo: Dār Al-Ma’ārif, 1998.
Al-Khuli, Amin, and Nashr Hamid Abu Zayd. “Metode Tafsir Sastra Ter. Khairon Nahdiyyin.” Yogyakrta: Adab Press, 2004.
Al-Suyuti, Jalaluddin. “Al-Dūr Al-Manṭur Fī Al-Tafsīr.” Cairo: Dar Al-Ihya Al-Kutub Al-Arabiyya, 1930.
Al-Tabari, Ibn Jarir. “Jami’al-Bayan Fi Tafsir Al-Qur’an.” Beirut: Dar Al-Fikr, 1978.
Alfian, Muhammad. “Hermeneutika Nasr Hamid Abu Zayd.” Islamika: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman 18, no. 01 (2018): 25–38.
Alwan, Hanaa. “Modern Approaches to Quranic Exegesis: Amin Al-Khuli’s Methodology.” Oxford University Press, 2023.
Anggraini, Sulistiya Ayu. “Aplikasi Metode Hermeneutika Nashr Hamid Abu Zayd tentang Poligami dalam Surah Al-Nisa Ayat 3.” Skripsi UIN Sunan Ampel, 2018.
Arkoun, Mohammed. “Rethinking Islamic Hermeneutics: Towards a New Approach to Qur’anic Exegesis.” Oxford University Press: Islamic Studies Journal, 2021.
Barlas, Asma. “Re-Understanding the Qur’an: A Contextual Approach.” International Institute of Islamic Thought (IIIT): American Journal of Islamic Social Sciences, 2010.
Farida, Umma. “Pemikiran dan Metode Tafsir Al-Qur’an Kontemporer.” Yogyakarta: Idea Press, 2010.
Fauzan, Ahmad. “Teks Al-Qur’an dalam Pandangan Nashr Hamid Abu Zayd.” Kalimah: Jurnal Studi Agama Dan Pemikiran Islam 13, no. 1 (2015): 71–92.
Ghufron, Achmad. “Metode Persilangan Al-Qur’an Dengan Sastra Oleh Amin Al-Khuli.” Al-Thiqah: Jurnal Ilmu Keislaman 2, no. 01 (2019): 82–105.
Hadi, Abd. “Metodologi Tafsir Al Quran dari Masa Klasik Sampai Masa Kontemporer.” Griya Media, 2021.
Hirsch, Eric Donald. Validity in Interpretation. Vol. 260. Yale University Press, 1967.
Ichwan, Moch Nur. “Meretas Kesarjanaan Kritis Al-Qur’an, Teori Hermeneutika Nasr Abu Zayd.” Jakarta: Teraju, 2003.
Ilyas, Yunahar. “Kuliah Ulumul Qur’an.” Yogyakarta: ITQAN Publishing, 2013.
Jamil, Husnaini. “Pendekatan Kritik Sastra Terhadap Al-Qur’an Perspektif Amin Al-Khuli.” MPBA UIN Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang, 2021, 1–23.
Martanti, B Q Hadia. “Metodologi Pembaharuan Pemikiran Islam Kontemporer Studi Komparatif Metodologi Muhammad Syahrur dan Nashr Hamid Abu Zaid.” El_Huda, IAI Qomarul Huda Bagu NTB 10, no. 2 (2019): 87–105.
Mir-Hosseini, Ziba. “Muslim Women’s Rights and the Qur’an: Bridging Tradition and Modernity Contemporary Islamic Studies Journal.” Contemporary Islamic Studies Journal, 2023.
Nasution, Harun. “Teologi Islam: Aliran-Aliran Sejarah Analisa Perbandingan.” Jakarta: UII Perss, 2010.
Neuwirth, Angelika. “Qur’an and History–a Disputed Relationship. Some Reflections on Qur’anic History and History in the Qur’an.” Journal of Qur’anic Studies 5, no. 1 (2003): 1–18.
Rahman, Fazlur. “Contemporary Approaches to Qur’anic Interpretation.” Journal of Islamic Thought and Civilization: University of Management and Technology (UMT), Lahore, 2012.
Ramadhani, Wali. “Amin Al-Khuli Dan Metode Tafsir Sastrawi Atas Al-Qur’an.” Jurnal At-Tibyan: Jurnal Ilmu Alqur’an Dan Tafsir 2, no. 1 (2017): 1–14.
Rippin, Andrew. “The Literary Approach to the Qur’an in Contemporary Islamic Scholarship.” Journal of Qur’anic Studies 6, no. 1 (2004): 1–18.
Saeed, A. “Contextualizing the Qur’an: Towards a Contemporary Understanding.” Journal of Qur’anic Studies: Edinburgh University Press 8, no. 1 (2006): 5–20.
Saeed, Abdullah. “Contextual Interpretation of the Qur’an: Theoretical and Practical Dimensions.” Journal of Qur’anic Studies: Edinburgh University Press, 2023.
———. “Hermeneutics and Qur’anic Interpretation: Strategies for Contemporary Contexts.” Edinburgh University Press: Journal of Qur’anic Studies, 2018.
———. “The Qur’an and Its Interpreters: The House of Islam and the Crescent of Integration.” Journal of Qur’anic Studies, 2010.
Shaikh, Sa’diyya. “Islamic Feminism and Qur’anic Hermeneutics: The Challenges of Patriarchy and the Promise of Reform University of Management and Technology (UMT), Lahore: Journal of Islamic Thought and Civilization.” Journal of Islamic Thought and Civilization, 2020.
Shihab, M Quraish. Kaidah Tafsir; Syarat, Ketentuan Dan Aturan Yang Patut Anda Ketahui Dalam Memahami Ayat-Ayat Al-Qur’an. Lentera Hati Group, 2013.
Tohir, Muhammad. “Al-Qur’an Dalam Pandangan Hermeneutika Nasr Hamd Abu Zayd.” Al-Thiqah: Jurnal Ilmu Keislaman 2, no. 01 (2019): 1–26.
Wadud, Amina. “A Feminist Reading of the Qur’an: Re-Evaluating Women’s Role in Islam Routledge: Journal of Islamic Feminist Studies.” Journal of Islamic Feminist Studies, 2022.
Webb, Suhaib. “Reading the Qur’an as Literature: Amin Al-Khuli’s Approach and Its Implications.” American Journal of Islamic Social Sciences, 2020.
Wijaya, Aksin. “Melihat Arah Baru Studi Ulumul Al-Qur’an; Memburu Pesan Tuhan Dibalik Fenomena Budaya.” Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2020.
Zaini, Zaini. “The Method Of Interpretation Of Syeh Muhammad Abduh And Syeh Rasyid Ridha In The Book Tafsir Al Manar.” Al-Bayan: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur’an Dan Hadist 2, no. 1 (2019): 1–17.
Zakiah, Ade Rosi Siti, and Nurfajriyani Nurfajriyani. “Interpretasi Kontekstual Makna Qawwām Dalam Al-Qur’an QS. An-Nisa’34: Aplikasi Hermeneutika Abdullah Saeed.” Al-Qudwah 1, no. 2 (2023): 129–46.
Zaman, Muhammad Qasim. Modern Islamic Thought in a Radical Age: Religious Authority and Internal Criticism. Cambridge University Press, 2012.
Zayd, Nasr Hamid Abu. “The Hermeneutical Circle and the Contextual Reading of the Qur’an.” Routledge: Qur’anic Hermeneutics Journal, 2014.
Zayd, Naṣr Ḥāmid Abū. “Reformation of Islamic Thought: A Critical Historical Analysis” 10 (2006).
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24014/alqudwah.v2i1.29087
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Editorial Office Board :
The Qur'anic and Tafsir Science Study Program and the Hadith Science Study Program. Faculty of Ushuluddin State Islamic University Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau.
H.R. Soebrantas Street No. 155 KM 18, Simpang Baru Panam, Pekanbaru 28293 PO.Box. 1004 Telp. 0761-562051 Fax. 0761-562051 Web: https://fush.uin-suska.ac.id/
https://ejournal.uin-suska.ac.id/index.php/alqudwah/index
Al-Qudwah by https://ejournal.uin-suska.ac.id/index.php/alqudwah/index is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.