The Correlation between Students’ Willingness to Communicate and Their Speaking Performance at the Tenth Grade of MAN 1 Pekanbaru

muhammad ichsan al -hafiz, rizky gushendra

Abstract


The purpose of this research is to examine whether there is any significant correlation between willingness to communicate and speaking performance at the tenth-grade students of MAN 1 Pekanbaru. There were 244 students as samples by using the simple random sampling technique. This research approach was a quantitative method and the technique used in this research was a correlational technique. In collecting the data, the writer distributed the questionnaire to the respondents to determine the willingness to communicate, which consist of 55 item statements and used documentation of the students' speaking score made by English teachers at the school to determine the speaking performance. The writer used Spearman correlation through SPSS 26.0 to analyze the data. The result of this research showed that sig.r obtained value is 0.000 lower than alpha value (0.05). it means that null hypothesis (Ho) is rejected while alternative hypothesis (Ha) is accepted. In conclusion, there is a correlation between willingness to communicate and speaking performance at the tenth-grade students of MAN 1 Pekanbaru.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Anderson, Gary. 2005. Fundamental of Educational Research, 2nd Edition. London: Falmer Press.

Ary, Donald., Lucy Cheser Jacobs, Asghar Razavieh, Christine K. Sorensen. 2010. Introduction to Research in Education, 8th Edition. Belmont: Wadsworth Publishing.

Barcelos, A. M. F. 2003. Researching beliefs about SLA: A critical review. In P. Kalaja & A. M. F. Barcelos (Eds.), Beliefs about SLA: New research approaches (7–33). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

Brown, H. D. 2001. Principles of Language Learning and Teaching (4th ed). San Fransisco: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.

Cohen, Louise, et al. 2007. Research Method in Education. New York: Routledge.

Creswell, J. W. 2008. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. New California: SAGE Publications.

D¨ornyei, Z. 2005. The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Dorman, J. P. 2003. Cross-national validation of the What is Happening in this Class? (WIHIC) questionnaire using confirmatory factor analysis. Learning Environments Research, 6(3), 231–245.

Havwini, Tian. 2019. Indonesian EFL Students’ Willingness to Communicate in the 2013 Curriculum Implementation: A Case Study. TEFLIN Journal, 30 (1): 105-120.

Hughes, Arthur. 2002. Testing for Language Teachers: Second Edition. Cambridge University Press.

Leather, J., & van Dam, J. 2003. Towards an ecology of language acquisition. Ecology of language acquisition. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

MacIntyre, P. D., Baker, S. C., Cle´ment, R., & Conrod, S. 2001. Willingness to Communicate, Social Support, and Language-Learning Orientations of Immersion Students. Studies on Second Language Acquisition, 23, 369-388.

MacIntyre, P., Baker, S., Clément, R.., & Donovan, L. 2003. Talking in Order to Learn: Willingness to Communicate and Intensive Language Programs. Canadian Modern Language Review, 59(4), 589-608.

Maftoon, Parviz & Saeid Najafi Sarem. 2013. Gender and Willingness to Communicate. Iranian Journal of Language Issues (IJLI), 1(1), 1-18.

Noels, K. A., Pelletier, L. G., Cl´ement, R., & Vallerand, R. J. 2000. Why are you learning a second language? Motivational orientations and self-determination theory. Language Learning, 50(1), 57–85.

Peng, J. E., & Woodrow, L. 2010. Willingness to Communicate in English: A Model in The Chinese EFL Classroom Context. Language Learning, 60(4), 834-876.

Richards, Jack C & Willy A. Renandya. 2002. Methodology in Language Teaching: An Anthology of Current Practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Riduwan. (2010). Metode & Teknik Menyusun Proposal Penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Thornbury Scoot. 2002. How to Teach Speaking. Vermont: Pearson Education.

Tudor, I. 2003. Learning to live with complexity: Towards an ecological perspective on language teaching. System, 31(1), 1–12.

Vongsila, Vatsana & Hayo Reinders. 2016. Making Asian Learners Talk: Encouraging Willingness to Communicate. RELC Journal, 1-17.

Wen, W. P., & Cl´ement, R. 2003. A Chinese Conceptualisation of Willingness to Communicate in ESL. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 16(1), 18–38.

Xie, Q. M. 2011. Willingness to Communicate in English among Secondary School Students in The Rural Chinese English As A Foreign Language (EFL) Classroom. Auckland: AUT University.

Yashima, T. 2002. Willingness to communicate in a second language: The Japanese EFL context. Modern Language Journal, 86(1), 54–66.

Yousefi, Mahna & Seyed Ahmad Kasaian. 2014. Relationship between Willingness to Communicate and Iranian EFL Learner’s Speaking Fluency and Accuracy. Journal of Advances in English Language Teaching, 2(6), 61-72.

Yueh Yea, Lo. 2018. The ESL Teachers’ Willingness to Communicate in English. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(3), 594-603.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24014/ijielt.v7i1.13772

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.



Indonesian Journal of Integrated English Language Teaching (p-ISSN 2355-5971)
Fakultas Tarbiyah dan Keguruan
Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau
Address: Jl. H. R. Soebrantas KM. 15 Tuahmadani, Tuahmadani Pekanbaru 

 Indexed by :
 

Flag Counter

View My Stats