ADDITIONAL MENU
Unlocking the Future: EFL Students' Insights on Artificial Intelligences for Academic Writing
Abstract
Lately, the widely used and fiercely debated ChatGPT has attracted the interest of researchers, professors, lecturers, and administrators. Additionally, English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners require AI feedback on scientific writing to improve their writing abilities. This quantitative study investigated Indonesian EFL learners' perceptions and challenges in a university English program using ChatGPT tools. This study investigated undergraduate students' viewpoints on using AI-powered ChatGPT tools in English academic writing. It focused on the main goal, results, and feedback to improve their second language writing skills. Data were collected from (n=80) students using questionnaires and semi-structured interviews to analyze their impressions. A survey was administered to EFL undergraduates in the English Language Education Study Program at Mataram State Islamic University, Indonesia. Writing ability was assessed online using Google Forms. However, students reported the advantages and difficulties of using ChatGPT for academic writing. These results demonstrate that AI-enabled digital tools can enhance student performance in EFL, academic writing, and other disciplines. The benefits and drawbacks of artificial intelligence must be studied and evaluated, and its implications for academic writing must be developed
Keywords
AI Technologies; Academic Writing; ChatGPT-App; English as a Foreign Language; Students Perception
Full Text:
PDFReferences
M. Abdalgane, “Exploring the Impact of AI on The EFL Context : A Case Study of Saudi Universities,” J. Intercult. Commun., vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 41–49, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.36923/jicc.v23i2.125.
Y. G. Sumakul, D. Toar, A. Hamied, and D. Sukyadi, “Language Education and Acquisition Research Network Artificial Intelligence in EFL Classrooms: Friend or Foe?,” LEARN J. Lang. Educ. Acquis. Res. Netw., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 232–256, 2022.
R. Jiang, “How does artificial intelligence empower EFL teaching and learning nowadays? A review on artificial intelligence in the EFL context,” Front. Psychol., vol. 13, no. Ml, pp. 1–8, 2022, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1049401.
A. (2023). Rad, H. S., Alipour, R., & Jafarpour, “Using artificial intelligence to foster students’ writing feedback literacy, engagement, and outcome: a case of Wordtune application. , May,” Interact. Learn. Environ., vol. 1–, no. 21, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2208170.
X. Zhao, “Leveraging Artificial Intelligence (AI) Technology for English Writing: Introducing Wordtune as a Digital Writing Assistant for EFL Writers,” RELC J., 2022, doi: 10.1177/00336882221094089.
B. Klímová and P. M. Ibna Seraj, “The use of chatbots in university EFL settings: Research trends and pedagogical implications,” Front. Psychol., vol. 14, no. March, pp. 1–7, 2023, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1131506.
H. Aljuaid, “The Impact of Artificial Intelligence Tools on Academic Writing Instruction in Higher Education: A Systematic Review,” May 03, 2024, SocArXiv. doi: 10.31235/osf.io/ph24v.
M. A. Yeo, “Academic integrity in the age of Artificial Intelligence (AI) authoring apps,” TESOL J., vol. 14, no. 3, p. e716, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.1002/tesj.716.
D. T. Y. G. Sumakul and F. A. Hamied, “Amotivation in AI injected EFL classrooms: Implications for teachers,” Indones. J. Appl. Linguist., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 26–34, May 2023, doi: 10.17509/ijal.v13i1.58254.
F. Kamalov, D. Santandreu Calonge, and I. Gurrib, “New Era of Artificial Intelligence in Education: Towards a Sustainable Multifaceted Revolution,” Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 16, p. 12451, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.3390/su151612451.
A. Tang, K. Li, K. O. Kwok, L. Cao, S. Luong, and W. Tam, “The importance of transparency: Declaring the use of generative artificial intelligence ( AI ) in academic writing,” J. Nurs. Scholarsh., vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 314–318, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.1111/jnu.12938.
Rahayu, S. Weda, Muliati, and N. De Vega, “Artificial Intelligence in writing instruction: A self-determination theory perspective,” XLinguae, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 234–244, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.18355/XL.2024.17.01.16.
S. Akgun and C. Greenhow, “Artificial intelligence in education: Addressing ethical challenges in K-12 settings,” AI Ethics, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 431–440, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s43681-021-00096-7.
F. Amirjalili, M. Neysani, and A. Nikbakht, “Exploring the boundaries of authorship: a comparative analysis of AI-generated text and human academic writing in English literature,” Front. Educ., vol. 9, p. 1347421, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.3389/feduc.2024.1347421.
J. M. Fernández Batanero, M. Montenegro Rueda, J. Fernández Cerero, and P. Román Gravan, “Impact of ict on writing and reading skills: a systematic review (2010-2020),” Texto Livre Ling. E Tecnol., vol. 14, no. 2, p. e34055, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.35699/1983-3652.2021.34055.
S. K. W. Guo, K., Li, Y., Li, Y., & Chu, “Understanding EFL students’ chatbot-assisted argumentative writing: An activity theory perspective.,” Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 1-, no. 20., 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12230-5.
R. Utami, S. P. T., & Winarni, “Utilization of artificial intelligence technology in an academic writing class: How do Indonesian students perceive?.,” Contemp. Educ. Technol., vol. 15, no. 4, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13419.
S. P. T. Utami, A. Andayani, R. Winarni, and S. Sumarwati, “Utilization of artificial intelligence technology in an academic writing class: How do Indonesian students perceive?,” Contemp. Educ. Technol., vol. 15, no. 4, p. ep450, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.30935/cedtech/13419.
C. Song and Y. Song, “Enhancing academic writing skills and motivation: assessing the efficacy of ChatGPT in AI-assisted language learning for EFL students,” Front. Psychol., vol. 14, p. 1260843, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1260843.
M. Khalil and E. Er, “Will ChatGPT get you caught? Rethinking of Plagiarism Detection,” Feb. 08, 2023, EdArXiv. doi: 10.35542/osf.io/fnh48.
I. Dergaa, K. Chamari, P. Zmijewski, and H. Ben Saad, “From human writing to artificial intelligence generated text: examining the prospects and potential threats of ChatGPT in academic writing,” Biol. Sport, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 615–622, 2023, doi: 10.5114/biolsport.2023.125623.
A. M. A. Mudawy, “Investigating EFL Faculty Members’ Perceptions of Integrating Artificial Intelligence Applications to Improve the Research Writing Process: A Case Study at Majmaah University,” May 04, 2024, SocArXiv. doi: 10.31235/osf.io/k4ub8.
R. Rusmiyanto, N. Huriati, N. Fitriani, N. K. Tyas, A. Rofi’i, and M. N. Sari, “The Role Of Artificial Intelligence (AI) In Developing English Language Learner’s Communication Skills,” J. Educ., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 750–757, May 2023, doi: 10.31004/joe.v6i1.2990.
M. C. Ratih and F. C. Kastuhandani, “Students’ Lived Experiences in Utilizing Artificial Intelligence for Thesis Writing,” NUSRA J. Penelit. Dan Ilmu Pendidik., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 760–769, May 2024, doi: 10.55681/nusra.v5i2.2696.
F. Kouam Arthur William, “AI in Academic Writing: Ally or Foe?,” Int. J. Res. Publ., vol. 148, no. 1, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.47119/IJRP1001481520246427.
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (Vol. 5). sage.
Marzuki, U. Widiati, D. Rusdin, Darwin, and I. Indrawati, “The impact of AI writing tools on the content and organization of students’ writing: EFL teachers’ perspective,” Cogent Educ., vol. 10, no. 2, p. 2236469, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.1080/2331186X.2023.2236469.
N. Nazari, M. S. Shabbir, and R. Setiawan, “Application of Artificial Intelligence powered digital writing assistant in higher education: randomized controlled trial,” Heliyon, vol. 7, no. 5, p. e07014, May 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07014.
R. Dale and J. Viethen, “The automated writing assistance landscape in 2021,” Nat. Lang. Eng., vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 511–518, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.1017/S1351324921000164.
M. Lee, P. Liang, and Q. Yang, “CoAuthor: Designing a Human-AI Collaborative Writing Dataset for Exploring Language Model Capabilities,” in CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, New Orleans LA USA: ACM, Apr. 2022, pp. 1–19. doi: 10.1145/3491102.3502030.
X. Zhao, “Leveraging Artificial Intelligence (AI) Technology for English Writing: Introducing Wordtune as a Digital Writing Assistant for EFL Writers,” RELC J., vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 890–894, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.1177/00336882221094089.
A. M. ( Archibald, M. M., & Clark, “ChatGTP: What is it and how can nursing and health science education use it?.,” J. Adv. Nurs., 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.15643.
K. H. Scerri, A., & Morin, “Using chatbots like ChatGPT to support nursing practice. .No Title,” J. Clin. Nurs., 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.16677.
A. Gómez-Camacho, J. de-Pablos-Pons, P. Colás-Bravo, and J. Conde-Jiménez, “Writing, creativity, and artificial intelligence. ChatGPT in the university context,” Comunicar, vol. 31, no. 77, pp. 47–57, 2023.
A. Stojanov, “Learning with ChatGPT 3.5 as a more knowledgeable other: an autoethnographic study,” Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ., vol. 20, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.1186/s41239-023-00404-7.
T. Waltzer, R. L. Cox, and G. D. Heyman, “Testing the Ability of Teachers and Students to Differentiate between Essays Generated by ChatGPT and High School Students,” Hum. Behav. Emerg. Technol., vol. 2023, 2023, doi: 10.1155/2023/1923981.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24014/ijaidm.v8i1.30307
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Office and Secretariat:
Big Data Research Centre
Puzzle Research Data Technology (Predatech)
Laboratory Building 1st Floor of Faculty of Science and Technology
UIN Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau
Jl. HR. Soebrantas KM. 18.5 No. 155 Pekanbaru Riau – 28293
Website: http://predatech.uin-suska.ac.id/ijaidm
Email: ijaidm@uin-suska.ac.id
e-Journal: http://ejournal.uin-suska.ac.id/index.php/ijaidm
Phone: 085275359942
Journal Indexing:
Google Scholar | ROAD | PKP Index | BASE | ESJI | General Impact Factor | Garuda | Moraref | One Search | Cite Factor | Crossref | WorldCat | Neliti | SINTA | Dimensions | ICI Index Copernicus
IJAIDM Stats