Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statment

Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement

Publication Ethics

Marwah: Jurnal Perempuan, Agama, dan Jender is a peer-reviewed journal and published by the Center for Gender and Children Studies (PSGA) of the Institute for Research and Community Service (LPPM) UIN Suska Riau which is published twice a year. Here are the standards of ethical behavior used in this journal in an article publication in line with the Code of Ethics for the COPE Journal Editor. This Code of Ethics is expected to be complied with by all parties involved in the issuance of the author, manager of the journal (editor), partner bebestari (reviewer) and publisher.

Publication Decision

The editor determines the publication process and integrates the function of author, partner and journal manager to publish good and reliable journals. The editor is responsible for deciding that the articles submitted to the journal will be published or not. Editor refers to the policy of the editorial board of journals that are restricted by law, such as defamation, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editor can discuss with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.
Editors work on principles and ethical standards as follows:

1. Fair Process

The editors evaluate script content based on their expertise irrespective of race, sex, sexual orientation, religious beliefs, ethnic origin, citizenship or political philosophy of the author.

2. Confidentiality

The editor and any editorial staff are not allowed to disclose any information about the manuscript to anyone other than the author, best partner or reviewer, other editorial advisors, and publishers.
Any manuscript received by a reviewer or a bistre partner shall be treated as a confidential document. Manuscripts may not be displayed or discussed with others except as authored by the editors

3. Avoiding Conflicts Of Interest

Unpublished material in a submitted manuscript should not be used in the editor's own research without the written consent of the author.
Confidential information or ideas obtained through peer review should be kept confidential and not used for personal gain. Reviewers should not consider scripts in which they have a conflict of interest because of a competitive, collaborative, or other element with any of the authors, companies or institutions associated with the text.

The Reviewer's Job

Reviewers are critically examining the substance of scientific this work in the field of expertise. The reviewers are in charge of providing input to the Editorial team's decision on the appropriateness of a script for publication.
Peer review helps editors in making editorial decisions and through editorial communication with authors can also help authors to improve the quality of the articles they compile.


Every partner selected but feels ineligible to review the manuscript provided by the editor or out of his or her competence must immediately refuse and not review the process. If you know of a more appropriate expert, you may recommend an editor to ask him or her as a partner to be bebestari.
Standards of Objectivity
The review process should be done objectively. The writer's personal criticism is inappropriate. Reviewers must provide their views clearly and accompanied by supporting arguments.
Source Statement
Reviewers shall identify other relevant works that have not been quoted by the author. Any statement which is the result of observation, derivation, or argument that has been used previously must be accompanied by relevant citations. The best partner or reviewer should also consider the substantial similarity or overlap between the text being considered and other published papers.
Appropriate recognition of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that affect the determination of the nature of their research.
Author's Duties
Reporting Standards
The author of the original research report must present an accurate report of the research and study conducted. The data taken should be accurately written in the research report. The manuscript should be detailed and have sufficient referrals to enable others to refer well. Report forgery or intentionally inaccurate behavior is unethical and unacceptable.
Originality and Plagiarism
The authors must make sure that they have written the original work entirely, and if the author has used the works and / or the words of others, then they are obliged to quote them correctly according to the rules.
A writer should not publish a script that describes the same research foundation in more than one major journal or publication. Sending the same script to multiple concurrent journals is unethical and unethical publishing behavior.
Writing Authorship
Authorship should be limited to those who have contributed significantly to the conception, design, implementation, or interpretation of reported research. Anyone who has made a significant contribution must be registered as a writer. Persons who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project must be recognized or registered as contributors.
The authors shall ensure that all member authors enter the manuscript, and all authors must have reviewed and approved the final version of the manuscript and have agreed to be published.
A fundamental mistake in published works
When a writer finds significant errors or inaccuracies in published texts, it is incumbent upon the author to immediately notify journal or publisher editors and work with editors to retract or correct the manuscript.


Bagi para pembaca dapat mengunduh Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statment Versi bahasa Indonesia pada link berikut: Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statment