PERSONALITI KERJAYA MAHASISWI ISLAM DI MALAYSIA

Khaizir Hj Ismail

Abstract


Women's issues and career is an issue that often discussed in the context of nation building. women as one of the nation, lately showing increasing role in all fields whether in the government or private sector and entrepreneurship. This research, as a preliminary study for the career woman of respondents predict a student of UniversitiKebangsaan Malaysia from the perspective of career personality and personality of way of thinking. this study using a quantitative approach completely, then the collection of information made using a questionnaire measuring instrument. The questionnaire is an effective way to get information from respondents. This study used a questionnaire which is divided into five parts. The first part consisted of demographic variables.the second part consists of interest baklat personality scale, the third part is the dominant personality scale and openness, and the fourth part is the personality of way of thinking. A total of 285 respondents Malaysia's national university students who participated in this study shows a model national university student career personality Malaysia. There are several forms of student personality model, namely: First: student career personality UniversitiKebangsaan Malaysia is the highest average in Social Personality, the next investigative and conventional. While the lowest is artistic, the next is realistic and entreprenersip. Secondly, personality Realistic by the faculty, the highest level is on the faculty of social sciences, information science and technology further engineering of the built environment. Third, personality according to investigative faculty, the highest level is on the faculty of information science technology, engineering, built environment, science and technology, medicine and social sciences / humanities. Fourth, the artistic personality by the faculty, the highest level is on the faculty of social sciences and humanities and then medical faculty. Fifth, social personality by the faculty, the highest level is on the faculty of social sciences of humanity, following Islamic studies, education and economic management. Sixth, personality entrepreneursip by the faculty, the highest level is on the faculty of economics  management and science faculty kemasarakatan next. Seventh, conventional personality by the faculty, the highest level is on the faculty of economics / management and further social science

Keywords


Women's issues, students

References


Aiken, Lewis R. (1994). Psycological Testing and assesment. Eight Edition. Massacuseth: A Devision of Simon & Schuster, Inc.

Aiken, Lewis R. (1993). Instructor’s Manual to Accompany. Psychological Testing and Assessment. Third Adition. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, Inc

Baron, Angela (1997). Test Feedback Warning. Poeple Management, 09/05/97, Vol. 3 Issue 19, p11, 1/9 p.

Bernardin, H. J. & Russel, J. E. A. (1998). Human Resource Management. Second Edition. The Mc Graw Hill Companies, Inc.

Cascio, Waynie F (1998a). Managing Human Resource Productivity, Quality of Life, Profits. Fifth Edition. Irwin Mc Graw Hill Companies.

Cascio, Waynie F (1998b). Applied Psychology in Human Resouce Management. Fifth Edition. USA Prantice Hall International Inc.

Clive, Fletcher (1995). What Means to Asses Integrity?. People Management, 08/24/95, p20, 2p.

Clive, Fletcher (1996). Mix and Match Fail to Work on Competencies. People Management, 09/12/96, Vol 2 Issue 18 p53, 2p.

Dewa Kentut Sukardi (1990). Analisis Tes Psikologis. Denpasar: Rineka Cipta

Dewa Kentut Sukardi (1997). Analisis Tes Psikologis (Edisi Baru). Denpasar: Rineka Cipta

Fisher, C.D, Schoenfeldt, Shaw, J.B (1993). Human Resource Management. Secon Edition. Hougton Mifflin Company.

Gomez Mejia. Balkin, Cardy, L.R. (1998). Managing Human Resource. Second Edition. New Jersey, Inc.

Gouzali Saddam (1996). Manejemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: PT. Toko Gunung Agung.

Greenberg, Eric Rolfe (1997). Testing Measures Up for Quality Control. HR Focus, Oct 97, Vol. 17 Issue 10. P2, 3/4.

Hansen Curtiss & Conrad Kelley. (1992). A Handbook of Psychological Assesment in Bussiness. Westport, CT. Quorum Books.

Holand JL. (1985). The Self Directed Search, Profesional Manual. Florida: Psychological Assesment Resources, Inc.

Kaplan, Robert M. And Sacuszo, Denis P. (1993). Psychological Testing: Principle Application and Issue. Third Edition. California: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.

Lewis Berry (1997). Using Psychometric Analysis to Reduce Staff Tur over.

Mohd. Salleh Lebar (1994). Asas Psikologi Perkembangan. Kuala Lumpur: Utusan Publication & Distribution Sdn Bhd.

Murphy, Kevin R. And David Shofer O (1994). Psychological Testing, Principle and Application. Fourth Edition. Engle Wood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Sidek Mohd Noah (1996). Laporan Penyelidikan, Pembentukan Inventori Personaliti, Inventori Minat Kerjaya, Inventori Nilai Pekerjaan dan Senarai Semak Masalah Pelajar. UPM. Fakulti Pengajian Pendidikan.

Truex Gregory. (1994). Psychological Testing of Hispanics. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, Jun 91, Vpl 25, Issue 2, p299, 1p.

Wevers (1996). Why Use Psychological Assesment ?. Management, Feb 96. Vol 43 Issue 1 , p29, 1/7p.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24014/af.v15i2.4016

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Editorial Office Board

Pascasarjana UIN Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau

Jl. KH. Ahmad Dahlan, No. 94 Kode Pos : 28129.

 

Contact Person :

Tuti Andriani

tutiandriani@uin-suska.ac.id

0822 8893 1412

  

 


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. View My Stats