Communication Techniques for Persuasion of Students and Lecturers In Shaping Behavior

Nasiratunnisaa Mallappiang, Muharram Muharram

Abstract


Many factors influence a student's success in the academic world. One of them is the role of the lecturer in providing direction or guidance on the problems experienced by students while on campus. Lecturers who act like this are called academic advisors. Lecturers in the formation of student behavior are strongly influenced by the ability of lecturers to communicate. Persuasive communication is an effective communication technique in shaping behavior because by using this communication, students can do something they want without feeling burdened and afraid. Forming behavior is an activity of communication and social interaction between lecturers and students to convey their knowledge in small and large groups. In learning activities, there are teaching techniques so that learning objectives can be achieved. Persuasive communication, in this case, is effective enough to influence or shape behavior.


Full Text:

PDF

References


C. Oschatz, “Long-term persuasive effects in narrative communication research: A meta-analysis,” J. Commun., vol. 70, no. 4, pp. 473–495, 2020, doi: 10.1093/joc/jqaa017.

I. Goovaerts, “Uncivil Communication and Simplistic Argumentation: Decreasing Political Trust, Increasing Persuasive Power?,” Polit. Commun., vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 768–788, 2020, doi: 10.1080/10584609.2020.1753868.

M. L. Tseng, “Sustainable packaged food and beverage consumption transition in Indonesia: Persuasive communication to affect consumer behavior,” Resour. Conserv. Recycl., vol. 161, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104933.

Q. A. Nguyen, “Explaining Intentions by Vietnamese Schoolchildren to Adopt Pro-Environmental Behaviors in Response to Climate Change Using Theories of Persuasive Communication,” Environ. Manage., vol. 66, no. 5, pp. 845–857, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s00267-020-01334-0.

P. Antonetti, “When Blame-Giving Crisis Communications are Persuasive: A Dual-Influence Model and Its Boundary Conditions,” J. Bus. Ethics, vol. 172, no. 1, pp. 59–78, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s10551-019-04370-x.

M. Becker, “It’s not just about the product: How persuasive communication affects the disclosure of personal health information,” Data Base Adv. Inf. Syst., vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 37–50, 2020, doi: 10.1145/3380799.3380804.

E. Novianti, “Persuasive Communication: Disaster Literacy in Tourism Areas,” Rev. Int. Geogr. Educ. Online, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 1203–1210, 2021, doi: 10.33403/rigeo.8006836.

F. Ferretti, “Persuasive conversation as a new form of communication in Homo sapiens,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, vol. 376, no. 1824. 2021. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0196.

A. Cancela, “Hedonic vs. epistemic goals in processing persuasive communications: Revisiting the role of personal involvement,” Motiv. Emot., vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 280–298, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s11031-021-09873-7.

M. Page, “Teaching medical professionalism: A qualitative exploration of persuasive communication as an educational strategy,” BMC Med. Educ., vol. 20, no. 1, 2020, doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-1993-0.

N. Yusof, “Group identity and extremism: The reflective experiences of youths regarding persuasive communication,” Child. Youth Serv. Rev., vol. 120, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105743.

Y. G. Seo, “Lifestyle counselling by persuasive information and communications technology reduces prevalence of metabolic syndrome in a dose–response manner: a randomized clinical trial (PrevMetSyn),” Ann. Med., vol. 52, no. 6, pp. 321–330, 2020, doi: 10.1080/07853890.2020.1783455.

A. J. Lazard, “Impact of photo manipulation and visual literacy on consumers’ responses to persuasive communication,” J. Vis. Lit., vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 90–110, 2020, doi: 10.1080/1051144X.2020.1737907.

M. K. Cha, “When people low in social class become a persuasive source of communication: Social class of other donors and charitable donations,” J. Bus. Res., vol. 112, pp. 45–55, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.02.039.

N. Green, “Measuring Users’ Attitudinal and Behavioral Responses to Persuasive Communication Techniques in Human Robot Interaction,” ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, vol. 2022. pp. 778–782, 2022. doi: 10.1109/HRI53351.2022.9889306.

Y. T. Negash, “Household waste separation intentions in mongolia: Persuasive communication leads to perceived convenience and behavioral control,” Sustain., vol. 13, no. 20, 2021, doi: 10.3390/su132011346.

A. Ort, “Mental contrasting with implementation intentions as a technique for media-mediated persuasive health communication,” Health Psychol. Rev., vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 602–621, 2022, doi: 10.1080/17437199.2021.1988866.

E. M. A. Geurts, “Persuasive communication in medical decision-making during consultations with patients with limited health literacy in hospital-based palliative care,” Patient Educ. Couns., vol. 105, no. 5, pp. 1130–1137, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.08.022.

K. Stepaniuk, “Persuasive linguistic tricks in social media marketing communication-The memetic approach,” PLoS One, vol. 16, no. 7, 2021, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253983.

M. J. C. Quintero, “Persuasive communication in politics as a fundamental element in the success of new political parties in Spain: Issuer, message and context. The case of Podemos and Ciudadanos,” Estud. Sobre el Mensaje Periodis., vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 59–69, 2020, doi: 10.5209/esmp.67286.

S. Rubinelli, “It is time for health institutions to invest in persuasive communication to combat low quality information: A lesson learned from the COVID-19 infodemic,” Front. Commun., vol. 7, 2022, doi: 10.3389/fcomm.2022.1006302.

I. Giammusso, “The matching effect in persuasive communication about lockdown,” Front. Psychol., vol. 13, 2022, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.987114.

Z. Ahmed, “Persuasive Communications, Online Reviews and Service Performances-A Study on the Hotel Industry of New Zealand,” Australas. Accounting, Bus. Financ. J., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 4–20, 2022, doi: 10.14453/aabfj.v16i1.2.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24014/sitekin.v20i2.22710

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 SITEKIN: Jurnal Sains, Teknologi dan Industri



Editorial Address:
FAKULTAS SAINS DAN TEKNOLOGI
UIN SULTAN SYARIF KASIM RIAU
Kampus Raja Ali Haji
Gedung Fakultas Sains & Teknologi UIN Suska Riau
Jl.H.R.Soebrantas No.155 KM 18 Simpang Baru Panam, Pekanbaru 28293
Email: sitekin@uin-suska.ac.id
© 2023 SITEKIN, ISSN 2407-0939

SITEKIN Journal Indexing:

Google Scholar | Garuda | Moraref | IndexCopernicus | SINTA


Creative Commons License
SITEKIN by http://ejournal.uin-suska.ac.id/index.php