PACKED LUNCH PHENOMENON FOR HUSBAND: NETIZENS' CONTESTATION ABOUT GENDER ROLES

Tya Asih Dayu Purwitasari, Muhammad Rizqy Al-Mubarok

Abstract


Packed lunch for husbands was a viral thread on Twitter in 2020. The thread containing photos of food and the recipe went viral because of the many responses from netizens regarding packed lunch for husbands related to gender roles. This article questions how gender roles relate to packed lunch for husbands, which netizens disputed in this thread. This research uses descriptive analysis method. By collecting primary data in the form of phrases, words, sentences contained in the @rainydecember thread along with citizen comments. After the data was collected, it was analyzed using Betty Friedan's feminine mystique perspective, then described. The results showed that the owner of the thread was shackled to the mystical feminine who consciously or not helped to spread and perpetuate it by making packed lunch for her husband. The thread then received mixed responses, netizens who widely supported the thread indicated that they were constructed of a patriarchal ideology and considered the ideal woman who was good at taking care of the household as a mystical feminine. As for those who are against these threads, they have the potential to misogyny and build stereotypes on women, especially aimed at the thread owner

Keywords


feminine mystique; misogyny; gender roles; patriarchal; social media

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ahdiah, I. (2013). Peran-Peran Perempuan dalam Masyarakat. Jurnal Academica, 5(2), 1085–1092.

Alyatalatthaf, M. D. M. (2019). Cybermisogyny: Perilaku Kebencian Terhadap Perempuan di Media Sosial (Analisis Wacana Kritis Komentar Cybermisogyny di Akun Instagram). Universitas Diponogoro.

Amir, S., & Suhartini, E. (2013). Mekanisme Pembagian Kerja Berbasis Gender (The Mechanism of Division Labor Based on Gender).

Aubrey, J. S., & Frisby, C. M. (2011). Sexual objectification in music videos: A content analysis comparing gender and genre. Mass Communication and Society, 14(4), 475–501. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2010.513468

Bray, F. (2007). Gender and Technology. Annual Review of Anthropology, 36, 37–53.

Everett, A. (2004). On Cyberfeminism and Cyberwomanism: High-tech Mediations of Feminism’s Discontents. Signs, 30(1), 1278–1286. https://doi.org/10.1086/422235

Fakih, M. (2008). Analisis Gender dan Transformasi Sosial. INSIST Press.

Friedan, B. (1974). The Feminine Mystique. Dell Publishing.

Holland, J. (2006). Mysogyny: The World’s Oldest Prejudice. Constable & Robinson Ltd.

Kellner, D. (1996). Media Culture: Cultural Studies, Identity and Politics between the Modern and the Post Modern. Westvie Press.

Kementerian Pemberdayaan Perempuan dan Perlindungan Anak Republik Indonesia. (2020). Pembangunan Manusia Berbasis Gender 2020.

Kusuma, M. R. P., & Fitriawan, R. A. (2020). Representasi Peran Domestik Perempuan (Analisis Semiotika John Fiske dalam Film Animasi Pendek “Bao”). E-Proceeding of Management, 1868–1876.

Mason-Bish, H., & Zempi, I. (2019). Misogyny, Racism, and Islamophobia: Street Harassment at the Intersections. Feminist Criminology, 14(5), 540–559. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557085118772088

Mernissi, F. (1991). The Veil and The Male Elite: A feminist Interpretation of Women’s Rights in Islam. Perseus Books Publishing.

Rokhimah, S. (2014). Patriarkhisme dan Ketidakadilan Gender. Muwazah, 6(1), 132–145.

Rosyidah, F. N., & Nurwati, N. (2019). Gender dan Stereotipe: Konstruksi Realitas dalam Media Sosial Instagram. Share : Social Work Journal, 9(1), 10–19. https://doi.org/10.24198/share.v9i1.19691

Ruth, S. (1998). Issues in Feminism: A First Course in Women’s Studies. Mayfield Publishing Company.

Santi, S. (2004). Perempuan dalam Iklan: Otonomi atas Tubuh atau Komoditi? Komunikologi (Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Komunikasi), 1(1), 1–12. http://college.

Sari, N. A., & Yusriansya, E. (2020). Analisis Wacana Kritis Terhadap Konten Media Sosial “Bekal Buat Suami” dalam Perspektif Gender. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Lingustik Dan Sastra (SEMANTIKS), 68–80. https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/prosidingsemantiks

Siswati, M. K., & Puspitawati, H. (2017). Peran Gender, Pengambilan Keputusan, dan Kesejahteraan Keluarga Dual Earner. Jurnal Ilmu Keluarga Dan Konsumen, 10(3), 169–180. https://doi.org/10.24156/jikk.2017.10.3.169

Thompson, L. (2018). “I can be your tinder nightmare”: Harassment and misogyny in the online sexual marketplace. Feminism and Psychology, 28(1), 69–89. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353517720226

Udasmoro, W. (2017). Dari Doing ke Undoing Gender: Teori dan Praktik dalam Kajian Feminisme. UGM Press.

Velayati, M. (2016). Gender and Muslim Families. In The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Family Studies. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Wiasti, N. M. (2017). Mencermati Permasalahan Gender dan Pengarusutamaan Gender (PUG). Sunari Penjor: Journal of Anthropology, 1(1), 29–42




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24014/marwah.v22i1.16703

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Marwah: Jurnal Perempuan, Agama dan Jender

Indexing:

Editorial Office Board :

Pusat Studi Gender dan Anak LPPM UIN Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau
Gedung Islamic Center Lantai 1
Jl. H.R. Soebrantas KM. 15.5, Simpangbaru, Tampan
Pekanbaru - 28293
email: jurnal.marwah@uin-suska.ac.id

Creative Commons License
Marwah: Jurnal Perempuan, Agama dan Jender is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International. 


View My Stats