An Educational Program Evaluation on Fluid Mechanics Course Oriented Critical Thinking Skill
Abstract
A way to actualize an educators in universities is through lectures. The present study aims to evaluate the fluid mechanics through the CIPP model. Conducted through evaluative research at one of the universities in Pekanbaru, the data were collected through interviews, observation, questionnaires and documents. The current research employs interview guidelines, observation sheet, questionnaires and document review sheets. The data analysis technique uses the data triangulation model. Based on results obtained in this line of research, there are no specific skills listed in the SCP, there is one sub-CLO that does not disclose critical thinking skills. Based on lecture observations, only one student asked questions and presented the answers to the exercise questions. Based on the results of the questionnaires, it was found that 69.7% of students still have difficulties in the topic of Dynamic Fluids. Based on interviews, students still have difficulty in using formulas. The conclusion is that fluid mechanics still need improvement in the SCP design, especially from the lecture strategy and assessment aspect thus it can later improve students’ critical thinking skills.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adetia, R., & Adirakasiwi, A. G. 2022. “Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Ditinjau Dari Self-Efficacy Siswa”. Jurnal Educatio FKIP UNMA, 8(2), 526–536. https://doi.org/10.31949/educatio.v8i2.2036
Wilson, L. O. 2016. “Anderson and Krathwohl–Bloom’s taxonomy revised. Understanding the new version of Bloom's taxonomy”. https://www.quincycollege.edu/wp-content/uploads/Anderson-and-Krathwohl_Revised-Blooms-Taxonomy.pdf . Online. Diunduh pada 19 Mei 2024.
Boak, G. 1998. A complete guide to learning contract. Aldershot: Gower.
Cossu, R., Awidi, I., & Nagy, J. 2024. “Critical thinking activities in fluid mechanics–A case study for enhanced student learning and performance”. Education for Chemical Engineers, 46, 35-42.
Diniya, D., Ilhami, A., Mahartika, I., & Prakash, O. 2021. “Kemampuan argumentasi ilmiah calon guru IPA melalui pendekatan mikir selama pandemi COVID-19”. Journal of natural science and integration, 4(1), 141-148.
Driscoll, M. P., & Burner, K. J. 2005. Psychology of learning for instruction. https://ocw.metu.edu.tr/pluginfile.php/9013/mod_resource/content/1/driscoll-ch10%20(1).pdf . Online. Diunduh pada 19 Mei 2024.
Erni, M. 2020. “Model Pembelajaran CIPS (Creative, Idependent Problem Solving)”. Rajawali Press: Depok.
Ghurri, A. 2014. “Dasar-Dasar Mekanika Fluida”. Bukit Jimbaran: Jurusan Teknik Mesin Universitas Udayana.
Hamalik, O. 2010. “Kurikulum dan Pembelajaran”. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara.
Hidayat, S. 2002. “Sistem pembelajaran di perguruan tinggi”. Al Qalam, 19(93), 109-132.
Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan RI. 2020. “Panduan Penyusunan Kurikulum Pendidikan Tinggi Di Era Industri 4.0 Untuk Mendukung Merdeka Belajar-Kampus Merdeka “. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi Kementerian Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan
Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan RI. 2020. “Standar Nasional Pendidikan Tinggi”. Permendikbud No.3 Tahun 2020.
Kementerian Pendidikan Kebudayaan Riset dan Teknologi RI. 2022. “Standar Pendidikan Guru”. Permendikbudristek No.56 Tahun 2022.
Kementerian Pendidikan Kebudayaan Riset dan Teknologi RI. 2023. “Penjaminan Mutu Pendidikan Tinggi”. Permendikbudristek No.53 Tahun 2023.
Lindgren, He,. Educational Psycholoo in The Cassroom, (New York: Wiley and Sons, 1967), h. 53.
Liuta, A. V., Perig, A. V., Afanasieva, M. A., & Skyrtach, V. M. 2019. “Didactic games as student-friendly tools for learning hydraulics in a technical university’s undergraduate curriculum”. Industry and higher education, 33(3), 198-213.
Minichiello, A., Armijo, D., Mukherjee, S., Caldwell, L., Kulyukin, V., Truscott, T., ... & Bhouraskar, A. 2021. “Developing a mobile application‐based particle image velocimetry tool for enhanced teaching and learning in fluid mechanics: A design‐based research approach”. Computer applications in engineering education, 29(3), 517-537.
Muhardi, M. 2004. “Kontribusi pendidikan dalam meningkatkan kualitas bangsa Indonesia”. Mimbar: Jurnal Sosial dan Pembangunan, 20(4), 478-492.
Napis. 2018. “Analysis of physics problem solving in the perspective of self-efficacy and adversity quotient”. Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA, 8(1), 31-30.
Nguyen, K. A., Borrego, M., Finelli, C. J., DeMonbrun, M., Crockett, C., Tharayil, S., ... & Rosenberg, R. 2021. “Instructor strategies to aid implementation of active learning: a systematic literature review”. International Journal of STEM Education, 8, 1-18.
Nulhaqim, S. A., Heryadi, D. H., Pancasilawan, R., & Ferdryansyah, M. 2016. “Peranan perguruan tinggi dalam meningkatkan kualitas pendidikan di Indonesia untuk menghadapi Asean community 2015 studi kasus: Universitas Indonesia”. Universitas Padjadjaran, Institut Teknologi Bandung. Share: Social Work Journal, 6(2), 197.
Pérez-Sánchez, M., & López-Jiménez, P. A. 2020. “Continuous project-based learning in fluid mechanics and hydraulic engineering subjects for different degrees”. Fluids, 5(2), 95.
Putra, A. 2017. “Rancangan Evaluasi Program Perkuliahan Pengetahuan Lingkungan Bermuatan Sustainable Development (SD) Untuk Meningkatkan Ecology Intelligence (EI) Calon Guru Biologi”. https://www.academia.edu/32635314/EVALUASI_PROGRAM_PERKULIAHAN. Diunduh pada 04 Mei 2024.
Romiszowski, A. J. 1989. “Attitudes and affect in learning and instruction”. Educational Media International, 26(2), 85-100.
Schäfle, C., & Kautz, C. 2021. “Student reasoning in hydrodynamics: Bernoulli’s principle versus the continuity equation”. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 17(1), 010147.
Sitepu, B. P., & Lestari, I. 2018. “Pelaksanaan rencana pembelajaran semester dalam proses pembelajaran di perguruan tinggi”. Perspektif Ilmu Pendidikan, 32(1), 41-49.
Sugianto, R., & Diniya, D. Meta-Analysis: Enhancing Junior High School Students’ higher Order Thinking Skills Through Problem Solving Learning Model In Natural Sciences-Physics. Jurnal Geliga Sains: Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 8(1), 55-63.
Syarifah, T. J., Usodo, B., & Riyadi. 2019. “Student’s critical thinking ability with higher order thinking skills (HOTS) question based on self-efficacy”. Journal of physics: conference series, 1265(1), 012013, 1-10.
Tiruneh, D.T., Cock, M.D., Weldeslassie, A.G., Elen, J., Janssen, R. (2017). Measuring critical thinking in physics: development and validation of a critical thinking test in electricity and magnetism. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(1), hlm 663 – 682.
Tomei, L. A. 2005. “Domains of Teaching. In Taxonomy for the Technology Domain” (pp. 1-21). IGI Global.
Uçar, B., & Demiraslan Çevik, Y. 2020. “The effect of argument mapping supported with peer feedback on pre-service teachers’ argumentation skills”. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 37(1), 6–29.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24014/jiik.v14i1.30116
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Dipublikasikan oleh:
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.