Bridging The Legitimacy Gap: A Multi-Level Governance Analysis of Geothermal Resistance in Pandarincang, Indonesia

Diah Ayu Pratiwi, Suherman Arifin, Ita Rosita Wahyiah, Dimas Saputra, Muhammad Solihin

Abstract


Geothermal energy is one of Indonesia's most promising renewable energy sources, particularly in areas along the Ring of Fire. However, managing geothermal energy often involves complex dynamics, including policy, governance, and local community resistance. This article aims to analyze the dynamics of geothermal energy policy governance in Indonesia, focusing on the case of Padarincang, Banten. This research uses a qualitative method with a case study approach. Data was collected through in-depth interviews with stakeholders (central government, local government, and local communities), observation, and documentation from government reports, media, and academic publications. The research findings indicate that geothermal energy policy in Padarincang demonstrates a conflict of interests at various government levels (national, regional, and village) and non-state actors (investors, mass organizations, and civil society). Community resistance arises due to weak participation mechanisms and a lack of communication between governance levels. This study emphasizes that the success of Indonesia's energy transition is highly dependent on strengthening collaborative governance across all levels and actors.


Keywords


multi-level governance; energy governance; geothermal energy; padarincang; transition energy

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adityatama, D., Umam, M., Purba, D., & Muhammad, F. (2019). Review on Geothermal Direct Use Application as an Alternative Approach in Community Engagement at Early Exploration Phase in Indonesia. PROCEEDINGS, 44th Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering, Stanford University.

Alam, Md. K. (2021). A Systematic Qualitative Case Study: Questions, Data Collection, NVivo Analysis, and Saturation. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management, 16(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1108/QROM-09-2019-1825

Anggreta, D. K., Somantri, G. R., & Purwanto, S. A. (2022). Social Acceptance: Mapping the Perspectives of Stakeholders in the Development of Geothermal Power Plants in West Sumatra, Indonesia. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 17(4), 1053–1065. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.170402

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (Fifth Edition). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://spada.uns.ac.id/pluginfile.php/510378/mod_resource/content/1/creswell.pdf

Dirjen EBTKE-KESDM. (2020). Rencana Strategis Direktorat Jendral Energi Baru Terbarukan dan Konservasi Energi 2020-2024. EBTKE-KESDM. https://ebtke.esdm.go.id/post/2020/05/18/2540/rencaa.strategis.renstra.ditjen.ebtke.2020-2024

Dutu, R. (2016). Challenges and policies in Indonesia’s energy sector. Energy Policy, 98, 513–519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.09.009

EBTKE-KESDM. (n.d.). Potensi Pengembangan Energi Panas Bumi di Indonesia. KESDM. Retrieved March 7, 2025, from https://ebtke.esdm.go.id/lintas/id/investasi-ebtke/sektor-panas-bumi/potensi

Halia Dinan, U. (2023). PERSEPSI MASYARAKAT TERHADAP EKSPLOITASI PANAS BUMI DI WILAYAH KERJA PERTAMBANGAN KALDERA RAWA DANAU. Jurnal Kommunity Online, 2(2), 25–38. https://doi.org/10.15408/jko.v2i2.28278

Halimatussadiah, A., Pratama, M. Y., Maulia, R. F., & Adriansyah, M. (2023). Analisis Bisnis dan Kebijakan untuk Mendorong Investasi Pembangkit Listrik Tenaga Panas Bumi (PLTP) di Indonesia. LPEM FEB UI. https://lpem.org/analisis-bisnis-dan-kebijakan-untuk-mendorong-investasi-pembangkit-listrik-tenaga-panas-bumi-pltp-di-indonesia/

Haykal Ahmad, A., Adityatama, D. W., Akram Rusdianto, M., Mintorogo Pradana, G., Amanda Beryll, T., Vian Prasetyo, P., & Rachmadani, A. (2022). Geothermal Direct Use Alternatives in Mataloko to Increase Public Acceptance. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1014(1), 012010. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1014/1/012010

Hooghe, L., Marks, G., & Schakel, A. (2008). Multi-Level Governance. https://hooghe.web.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/11492/2020/11/2020_hooghe-marks-schakel_multilevel-governance_reduced-size-Caramani.pdf

Husni, H. A., Perdana, T. S. P., Purwanto, E. H., & Setiawan, H. (2023). Geothermal Business Outlook in Indonesia.

Ibrohim, A., Prasetyo, R. M., & Rekinagara, I. H. (2019). Understanding Social Acceptance of Geothermal Energy: A Case Study from Mt. Lawu, Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 254, 012009. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/254/1/012009

Jatnika, J., & Amal, M. I. (2023). Tantangan Implementasi Net Zero Emission di Banten: Studi Kasus Pembangunan Geothermal Padarincang. ijd-demos, 5(4). https://doi.org/10.37950/ijd.v5i4.433

Milko, V. (2024). Financial and community hurdles slow geothermal energy development in Southeast Asia. AP News. https://apnews.com/article/geothermal-energy-indonesia-philippines-climate-finance-6de912a0a2911f3cb96a875aac3c6c95

Muldi, A. (2021). MODEL KOMUNIKASI DALAM PENGELOLAAN KONFLIK GEOTERMAL DI KABUPATEN SERANG. Jurnal Riset Komunikasi, 12(1), 117–134. https://dx.doi.org/10.31506/jrk.v12i1.11739

Muliawati, F. D. (2024). Target Bauran EBT RI 2025 Turun Jadi 17%, Ini Alasan ESDM.. CNBC Indonesia. https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/news/20240118173844-4-507048/target-bauran-ebt-ri-2025-turun-jadi-17-ini-alasan-esdm

Nasruddin, Alhamid, M. I., Daud, Y., & Surachman, A. (2016). Potential of Geothermal Energy for Electricity Generation in Indonesia: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 53, 733–740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.09.032

Nurwahyudin, D. S., & Harmoko, U. (2020). Pemanfaatan dan Arah Kebijakan Perencanaan Energi Panas Bumi di Indonesia Sebagai Keberlanjutan Maksimalisasi Energi Baru Terbarukan. Jurnal Energi Baru dan Terbarukan, 1(3), 111–123. https://doi.org/10.14710/jebt.2020.10032

Pambudi, N. A., & Ulfa, D. K. (2024). The geothermal energy landscape in Indonesia: A comprehensive 2023 update on power generation, policies, risks, phase and the role of education. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 189, Part B(114008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2023.114008

Qorizki, D., Permadi, D. B., Yuwono, T., & Rohman, R. (2021). Should Drill or Shouldn’t Drill? Urban and Rural Dwellers’ Acceptance of Geothermal Power Plant in Mount Slamet Protection Forest, Indonesia. Forest and Society, 575–590. https://doi.org/10.24259/fs.v5i2.13400

Rosary, E. de. (2022, February 12). Proyek Geothermal Wae Sano: Antara Penolakan, Kepentingan Pariwisata dan Pengurangan Energi Fosil. Mongabay. https://www.mongabay.co.id/2022/02/12/proyek-geothermal-wae-sano-antara-penolakan-kepentingan-pariwisata-dan-pengurangan-energi-fosil/

Rybach, L. (2003). Geothermal energy: Sustainability and the environment. Goethermics, 32(4–6), 463–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0375-6505(03)00057-9

Savitri, P. I. (2024). ESDM laporkan bauran energi baru terbarukan mencapai 13,93 persen. ANTARA News.

Setiawan, H. (2014). Geothermal Energy Development in Indonesia: Progress, Challenges and Prospect. International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, 4(4), 224. https://doi.org/10.18517/ijaseit.4.4.405

Sovacool, B. K., & Martiskainen, M. (2020). Hot transformations: Governing rapid and deep household heating transitions in China, Denmark, Finland and the United Kingdom. Energy Policy, 139, 111330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111330

Taum, A. P. (2025, March 13). Tolak PLTP Mataloko, Massa Alter KGF Diterima Bupati Ngada. Media Indonesia. https://mediaindonesia.com/nusantara/751589/tolak-pltp-mataloko-massa-alter-kgf-diterima-bupati-ngada

Udu, J. D. (2021, Agustus). Menimbang Kembali Proyek Geothermal Wae Sano. detikNews. https://news.detik.com/kolom/d-5701797/menimbang-kembali-proyek-geothermal-wae-sano

Yolanda, S. M., Anggraini, D., & Putri, I. A. (2021). Gerakan Perempuan Salingka Gunung Talang dalam Menolak Pembangunan Geothermal di Kabupaten Solok. Tanah Pilih, 1(1), 20–32. https://doi.org/10.30631/tpj.v1i1.674




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24014/jel.v16i2.38172

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Statistik Counter:

 

Flag Counter

Indexed by :

  The Influence Of Leadership, Organizational Culture, Work Discipline, And  Compensation On The Performance Of Employees Of The Park And Hygiene Unit  (Tamsih) Of Panca Budi Medan | EKOMBIS REVIEW: Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi