The Historical Distinction between the Qur’an and Hadith: A Critical Examination of John Wansbrough’s Revisionist Perspective by Fred M. Donner

Eko Zulfikar, Zaki Faddad Syarif Zain, Adrika Fithrotul Aini, Azhar Amrullah Hafizh

Abstract


This article aims to critically examines the distinction between the Qur’an and Hadith in response to John Wansbrough’s revisionist-skeptical perspective on the origins of the Qur’an. Wansbrough argued that both corpora emerged from the same “sectarian” milieu and developed within a nearly identical historical timeframe. The present study addresses two primary questions: how Fred M. Donner conceptualizes the distinction between the Qur’an and Hadith, and how his arguments challenge Wansbrough’s theoretical framework. Employing a qualitative methodology with a descriptive-analytical approach, this research analyzes the principal works of both scholars to compare their arguments from textual and historical perspectives. The findings indicate that Wansbrough’s thesis lacks a robust historical foundation, as six key aspects religious and political authority, portrayals of the Prophet’s contemporaries, elements of anachronism, narratives of earlier prophets, depictions of Prophet Muhammad, and descriptions of ritual prayer reveal significant differences between the Qur’an and Hadith. These results support the conclusion that the Qur’an did not originate from the same sectarian environment as the Hadith but emerged in an earlier and distinct historical context. Consequently, the Qur’an is understood to have preceded the Hadith both chronologically and in terms of codification. This article contributes to clarifying the independence and authenticity of the Qur’an as the earliest and primary source of Islamic teaching, while enriching textual-historical scholarship in response to Western revisionist discourse concerning the origins of Islamic scripture.

 

Abstrak: Artikel ini bertujuan mengkaji secara kritis perbedaan (distingsi) antara al-Qur’an dan hadis sebagai respons terhadap pandangan revisionis-skeptis John Wansbrough mengenai asal-usul al-Qur’an. Wansbrough menilai bahwa kedua korpus tersebut lahir dari lingkungan “sektarian” yang sama dan terbentuk dalam periode historis yang hampir bersamaan. Penelitian ini berupaya menjawab dua pertanyaan utama: bagaimana Fred M. Donner memandang distingsi antara al-Qur’an dan hadis, serta bagaimana sanggahannya terhadap konstruksi pemikiran Wansbrough. Menggunakan metode kualitatif dengan analisis deskriptif-analitis, penelitian ini menelaah karya-karya utama kedua tokoh tersebut untuk membandingkan argumentasi mereka secara tekstual dan historis. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pandangan Wansbrough tidak memiliki dasar yang kuat secara historis, sebab enam aspek utama, yakni otoritas agama dan politik, gambaran tentang masyarakat sezaman Nabi, unsur anakronisme, kisah para nabi terdahulu, representasi Nabi Muhammad, dan deskripsi tentang ritual salat menunjukkan perbedaan yang signifikan antara al-Qur’an dan hadis. Temuan ini menegaskan bahwa al-Qur’an tidak berasal dari lingkungan sektarian yang sama dengan hadis, melainkan memiliki konteks dan kronologi kemunculan yang lebih awal. Al-Qur’an diyakini muncul lebih dahulu dibandingkan hadis, baik secara kronologis maupun dalam proses kodifikasinya. Artikel ini berkontribusi dalam memperjelas independensi dan keotentikan al-Qur’an sebagai sumber ajaran Islam, sekaligus memperkaya kajian tekstual-historis dalam menghadapi wacana revisionisme Barat terhadap asal-usul dua korpus Islam.


Keywords


Historical distinction; Qur’an and Hadith; Fred M. Donner; John Wansbrough; Western Revisionism.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Al-A’zami, Muhammad Musthafa. The History of The Qur’anic Text: From Revelation to Compilation. Leicester: UK Islamic Academy, n.d.

Al-Bukhari, Muhammad bin Ismail bin Ibrahmi bin al-Mughirah. Shahih Al-Bukhari. Kairo: Dar al-Sya’b, 1987.

Al-Naisaburi, Abu al-Husain Muslim bin al-Hajjaj. Shahih Muslim. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyah, 1999.

Al-Qaththan, Manna’. Mabahits Fi Ulum Al-Qur’an. Kairo: Maktabah Wahbah, n.d.

Al-Sijistani, Abu Dawud Sulaiman. Sunan Abu Dawud. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-‘Arabi, n.d.

Al-Thabari, Abu Ja’far bin Muhammad Ibn Jarir. Jami’ Al-Bayan ’an Ta’wil Ay Fi Al-Tafsir Al-Qur’an. Kairo: Dar al-Hijr, 2001.

Al-Tirmidzi, Muhammad bin Isa Abu Isa. Sunan Al-Tirmidzi. Beirut: Dar al-Turats Ihya’ al-Arabi, n.d.

Anshori, Muhammad. “Tren-Tren Wacana Studi Al-Qur’an Dalam Pandangan Orientalis Di Barat.” Nun: Jurnal Studi Alquran Dan Tafsir Di Nusantara 4, no. 1 (2019): 13–44. https://doi.org/10.32495/nun.v4i1.35.

Azizi, Muhammad Hildan. “Kesantunan Berbahasa Dakwah Struktural Pada Debat Politik Para Nabi Dalam Al-Qur’an.” Dakwatuna: Jurnal Dakwah Dan Komunikasi Islam 9, no. 1 (2023): 42–43.

Donner, Fred M. “A Historian ’ s View of the Qurʾān.” Journal of the International Qur’anic Studies 9, no. 1 (2024): 1–13.

———. Muhammad and the Believers: At the Origins of Islam. London: Harvard University Press, 2010.

———. Narratives of Islamic Origins: The Beginnings of Islamic Historical Writing. Princeton: The Darwin Press, 1999.

———. “The Historian, the Believer, and the Qur’an.” In New Perspective on the Qur’an: The Qur’an in Its Historical Context, edited by Gabriel Said Reynolds. New York: Routledge, 2011.

———. “The Qur’an in Recent Scholarship: Challenges and Desiderata.” In The Qur’an in Its Historical Context, 29–49. London: Routledge, 2007.

Fadholi, Ahmad. “Studi Kritis Terhadap Pemikiran John Wonsbrough Tentang Historisitas Al-Qur’an.” Hermeunetik 8, no. 2 (2014): 281–304.

Fathurrohman, Rizal, and Marhumah Marhumah. “Fred M. Donner’s Views on Orientalist Thought about the Distinction between the Qur’an and Hadith.” Mashdar: Jurnal Studi Al-Qur’an Dan Hadis 4, no. 2 (2022): 219–30. https://doi.org/10.15548/mashdar.v4i2.5398.

Graves, Michael. “Form Criticism or a Rolling Corpus: The Methodology of John Wansbrough through the Lens of Biblical Studies.” Journal of the International Qur’anic Studies Association 1, no. 1 (2016): 47–92. https://doi.org/10.5913/jiqsa.1.2017.a005.

Hanbal, Aḥmad bin. Musnad Aḥmad Bin Hanbal. Kairo: Muassasah Qurthubah, n.d.

Hidayah, Saniatul & Zulfadli, Pemikiran Tafsir Al-Qur’an Kontemporer: Studi Komparatif Metode Tafsir Amīn Al-Khūlī dan Nashr Hamīd Abū Zayd, Al-Qudwah; Jurnal Studi Qur’an dan Hadis 2, no 1(2024): 99-115. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24014/alqudwah.v2i1.29087

Ibrahim, Sulaiman. “Sejarah Teks Al-Qur’an : Studi Atas Pemikiran John Wansbrough.” Farabi 13, no. 2 (2016): 187–207.

Katsir, ‘Imaduddin Abu al-Fida’ Ibn. Qishashul Anbiya’. Edited by Moh Syamsi Hasan. Surabaya: Amelia, 2015.

Majdi, Ahmad Labib, and Iik Arifin Mansurnoor. “Fred McGraw Donner Tentang Al-Qur’an: Pemikiran Dan Catatan Kritis Terhadap Kesarjanaan Non-Muslim.” Journal of Qur’an and Hadith Studies 10, no. 2 (2021): 155–78.

Minhaji, Akh. “John F. Wansbrough Dan Salvation History Dalam Kajian Islam.” Thaqafiyyat 18, no. 2 (2017): 128–45.

Noldeke, Theodor. The History of the Qurʾān. Brill: Hotei Publishing, 2013.

Rahman, Fazlur. Major Themes of The Qur’ān. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2009.

Rahman, Yusuf. “A Modern Western Approach to the Qur’an: A Study of John Wanbrough’s Qur’anic Studies and Its Muslim Replies.” McGill Journal of Middle East Studies 4 (1996).

———. “Survei Bibliografis Kajian Al-Qur’an Dan Tafsir Di Barat: Kajian Publikasi Buku Dalam Bahasa Inggris Sejak Tahun 2000an.” Journal of Qur’an and Hadith Studies 4, no. 1 (2015): 103–27. https://doi.org/10.15408/quhas.v4i1.2285.

———. “Tren Kajian Al-Qur’an Di Dunia Barat.” Jurnal Studia Insania 1, no. 1 (2013): 1. https://doi.org/10.18592/jsi.v1i1.1076.

Rippin, Andrew. “Literary Analysis of Qur’an, Tafsir, and Sira: The Methodologies of John Wansbrough.” In Aprroaches to Islam in Religious Studies, edited by Richad C. Martin. Oxford: The University of Arizona Press, 1985.

Rusmana. Al-Qur’an Dan Hegemoni Wacana. Bandung: CV. Pustaka Setia, 2006.

Saad, Mukhlisin. “Fred Donner, Early Islamic Narratives and The Problem of The Authenticity of The Qur’an.” Al Quds: Jurnal Studi Alquran Dan Hadis 8, no. 3 (2024): 86–87. https://doi.org/10.29240/alquds.v8i3.8852.

Salsabila, Akmalia, and Rizal Samsul Mutaqin. “Mengungkap Pesan Di Balik Kisah Abu Lahab Dalam Al-Qur`an ( 111 ): 1-5 ( Kajian Semiotika Michael Riffatere ).” Suhuf 16, no. 2 (2023): 441–61.

Sani, Azwar. “A Study of John Wansbrough Thoughts on Qur’Anic Studies.” Tanzil: Jurnal Studi Al-Quran 6, no. 1 (2023): 71–84. https://doi.org/10.20871/tjsq.v6i1.304.

Segovia, Carlos A. “John Wansbrough and the Problem of Islamic Origins in Recent Scholarship: A Farewell to the Traditional Account.” In The Coming of the Comforter: When, Where, an to Whom?, edited by Carlos A. Segovia and Basil Lourie, xix. United State of America: Gorgias Press, 2012.

Sirry, Mun’im. Kontroversi Islam Awal Antara Mazhab Tradisionalis Dan Revisionis. Bandung: PT Mizan Pustaka, 2015.

Suryadilaga, M. Alfatih. “Pendekatan Historis John Wansbrough Dalam Studi Al-Qur’an.” In Studi Al-Qur’an Kontemporer, edited by Abdul Mustaqim and Sahiron Syamsudin. Yogyakarta: PT Tiara Wacana Yogya, 2002.

Suryadilaga, Muhammad Alfatih. “Kajian Atas Pemikiran John Wansbrough Tentang Al-Qur’an Dan Nabi Muhammad.” Tsaqafah 7, no. 1 (2011): 89. https://doi.org/10.21111/tsaqafah.v7i1.109.

Ulfiana, Ulfiana. “Otentisitas Al-Qur’an Perspektif John Wansbrough.” Ushuluna: Jurnal Ilmu Ushuluddin 5, no. 2 (2019): 212–31. http://journal.uinjkt.ac.id/index.php/una%0AOTENTISITAS.

Wansbrough, Jhon. Quranic Studies: A Note on Arabic Rethoric Arabic Rethoric and Qur’anic Exegesis. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977.

Wansbrough, John. “Arabic Rhetoric and Qur’anic Exegesis.” Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London 31, no. 3 (1968): 469–85.

Wikipedia. “John Wansbrough.” Accessed December 12, 2023. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Wansbrough.

Zulfa, Laila Ngindana. “Wansbrough Dan Islamic Studies.” Jurnal PROGRESS: Wahana Kreativitas Dan Intelektualitas 3, no. 3 (2018): 1–26. https://doi.org/10.31942/pgrs.v3i3.1688.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24014/alqudwah.v3i2.37551

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 

Editorial Office Board :

The Qur'anic and Tafsir Science Study Program and the Hadith Science Study Program. Faculty of Ushuluddin State Islamic University Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau.

H.R. Soebrantas Street No. 155 KM 18, Simpang Baru Panam, Pekanbaru 28293 PO.Box. 1004 Telp. 0761-562051 Fax. 0761-562051 Web: https://fush.uin-suska.ac.id/

https://ejournal.uin-suska.ac.id/index.php/alqudwah/index

Creative Commons LicenseAl-Qudwah by https://ejournal.uin-suska.ac.id/index.php/alqudwah/index is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Flag Counter

Web Analytics Made Easy - Statcounter View My Stats