CT Radiomics and Ensemble Learning for 5-Year Survival Prediction in Colorectal Liver Metastases

Widya Astuti, Catur Edi Widodo, Qidir Maulana Binu Soesanto

Abstract


Colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) significantly impact patient survival with high recurrence rates. Traditional prognostic models often overlook tumor heterogeneity, leading to suboptimal risk stratification. To address this, radiomics was employed to quantify sub-visual tumor phenotypes, while ensemble learning was selected to robustly handle high-dimensional feature complexity and improve generalization capability. This retrospective study analyzed 145 CRLM patients from The Cancer Imaging Archive, extracting 1130 radiomics features from preoperative CT scans alongside clinical variables. Data were split into training (n=101) and testing (n=44) sets, with feature selection reducing the input to 16 key features. Three ensemble models (XGBoost, LightGBM, Random Forest) were optimized using Optuna, incorporating SMOTE and isotonic calibration. On the test set, XGBoost achieved ROC-AUC 0.918, sensitivity 0.739, and specificity 0.952. LightGBM yielded ROC-AUC 0.916, sensitivity 0.782, and specificity 0.904. Random Forest recorded ROC-AUC 0.888, sensitivity 0.826, and specificity 0.667. Key features included "progression or recurrence" and wavelet-based texture metrics reflecting tumor heterogeneity. These findings demonstrate the effectiveness of combining CT radiomics with gradient boosting models to capture complex prognostic patterns. This integration enhances 5-year survival prediction in CRLM, offering a non-invasive tool for personalized risk stratification and improved clinical decision-making compared to the currently utilized traditional prognostic models.

Keywords


CT Imaging; Liver Metastasis; Machine Learning; Radiomics; Survival Prediction

References


Y. Kong, L. Wan, X. Yue, F. Tang, and X. Zhou, “An interpretable machine learning model based on MRI radiomics and GAME score for predicting early recurrence after thermal ablation in colorectal liver metastases,” Int. J. Colorectal Dis., vol. 41, no. 1, p. 29, 2026, doi: 10.1007/s00384-025-05079-2.

S. Kokkinakis, I. A. Ziogas, J. D. Llaque Salazar, D. P. Moris, and G. Tsoulfas, “Clinical Prediction Models for Prognosis of Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Comprehensive Review of Regression-Based and Machine Learning Models,” Cancers (Basel)., vol. 16, no. 9, 2024, doi: 10.3390/cancers16091645.

Y. Kong, X. Huang, X. Cao, F. Tang, and X. Zhou, “Early Recurrence of Colorectal Liver Metastasis (Number ≤ 5 and Largest Diameter ≤ 3 cm) after Resection or Thermal Ablation: a Multi-center Study of Patterns, Safety, Survival and Risk Factors,” J. Gastrointest. Cancer, vol. 56, no. 1, p. 77, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s12029-025-01200-4.

A. Brunetti, G. M. Zaccaria, E. Sibilano, S. Marzi, A. Vidiri, and V. Bevilacqua, “Development and independent validation of explainable radiomics-based machine learning models for prognosis in colorectal liver metastases,” Front. Digit. Health, vol. Volume 7-2025, 2026, doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1752699.

Y. Lin, Y. Huang, Z. Liu, X. Feng, and C. Yang, “Predicting early recurrence of colorectal cancer liver metastases: an integrative approach using radiomics and machine learning,” Front. Oncol., vol. 15, p. 1613093, 2025, doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1613093.

X. Yan et al., “A Multimodal MRI-based model for colorectal liver metastasis prediction: integrating radiomics, deep learning, and clinical features with SHAP interpretation,” Current Oncology, vol. 32, no. 8, p. 431, 2025, doi: 10.3390/curroncol32080431.

A. L. Simpson et al., “Preoperative CT and survival data for patients undergoing resection of colorectal liver metastases,” Sci. Data, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 172, 2024, doi: 10.1038/s41597-024-02981-2.

J. J. M. Van Griethuysen et al., “Computational radiomics system to decode the radiographic phenotype,” Cancer Res., vol. 77, no. 21, pp. e104–e107, 2017, doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-0339.

A. Zwanenburg et al., “The Image Biomarker Standardization Initiative: Standardized Quantitative Radiomics for High-Throughput Image-based Phenotyping,” Radiology, vol. 295, no. 2, pp. 328–338, Mar. 2020, doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020191145.

D. Mackin et al., “Measuring computed tomography scanner variability of radiomics features,” Invest. Radiol., vol. 50, no. 11, pp. 757–765, 2015, doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000180.

P. Lambin et al., “Radiomics: the bridge between medical imaging and personalized medicine,” Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol., vol. 14, no. 12, pp. 749–762, 2017, doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2017.141.

H. Hu, J. C. Chi, B. Zhai, and J. H. Guo, “CT-based radiomics analysis to predict local progression of recurrent colorectal liver metastases after microwave ablation,” Medicine, vol. 102, no. 52, 2023, doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000036586.

Y. Yan et al., “Multiphase MRI-Based Radiomics for Predicting Histological Grade of Hepatocellular Carcinoma,” Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 60, no. 5, pp. 2117–2127, Nov. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.29289.

C. Marzi et al., “Collinearity and Dimensionality Reduction in Radiomics: Effect of Preprocessing Parameters in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Magnetic Resonance T1 and T2 Mapping,” Bioengineering, vol. 10, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.3390/bioengineering10010080.

O. O. Oladimeji, H. Ayaz, I. McLoughlin, and S. Unnikrishnan, “Mutual information-based radiomic feature selection with SHAP explainability for breast cancer diagnosis,” Results in Engineering, vol. 24, p. 103071, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2024.103071.

M. Karabacak, S. Patil, R. Feng, R. K. Shrivastava, and K. Margetis, “A large scale multi institutional study for radiomics driven machine learning for meningioma grading,” Sci. Rep., vol. 14, no. 1, p. 26191, 2024, doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-78311-8.

A. Demircioğlu, “The effect of data resampling methods in radiomics,” Sci. Rep., vol. 14, no. 1, p. 2858, 2024, doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-53491-5.

G. Mehri-kakavand, S. Mdletshe, M. Amini, and A. Wang, “Multimodal radiomics fusion for predicting postoperative recurrence in NSCLC patients,” J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol., vol. 151, no. 10, p. 261, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s00432-025-06311-w.

L. Zedda, A. Loddo, and C. Di Ruberto, “Advancements in radiomics: A comprehensive survey of feature types and their correlation on modalities and regions,” Neurocomputing, p. 131192, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.neucom.2025.131192.

P. Lin, Y. Lin, R. Gao, W. Wan, Y. He, and H. Yang, “Integrative radiomics and transcriptomics analyses reveal subtype characterization of non-small cell lung cancer,” Eur. Radiol., vol. 33, no. 9, pp. 6414–6425, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-09503-5.

X. Li, C. Li, H. Wang, L. Jiang, and M. Chen, “Comparison of radiomics-based machine-learning classifiers for the pretreatment prediction of pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant therapy in breast cancer,” PeerJ, vol. 12, p. e17683, 2024, doi:10.7717/peerj.17683.

Y. M. Indah, R. Aristawidya, A. Fitrianto, E. Erfiani, and L. M. R. D. Jumansyah, “Comparison of Random Forest, XGBoost, and LightGBM Methods for the Human Development Index Classification,” Jambura Journal of Mathematics, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 14–18, 2025, doi: 10.37905/jjom.v7i1.28290.

H. Moradmand et al., “Graph feature selection for enhancing radiomic stability and reproducibility across multiple institutions in head and neck cancer,” Sci. Rep., vol. 15, no. 1, p. 27995, 2025, doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-12161-w.

J. Camps, A. Jiménez-Franco, R. García-Pablo, J. Joven, and M. Arenas, “Artificial intelligence-driven integration of multi-omics and radiomics: A new hope for precision cancer diagnosis and prognosis,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Basis of Disease, vol. 1871, no. 6, p. 167841, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2025.167841.

J.-P. Wang et al., “Machine learning-based radiomics models for the prediction of metachronous liver metastases in patients with colorectal cancer: A multimodal study,” Oncol. Lett., vol. 30, no. 2, p. 394, 2025, doi: 10.3892/ol.2025.15140.

D. Zhang, P. Li, Y. Wei, M. Xue, F. Guo, and C. Li, “Predicting the recurrence risk of liver metastasis from colorectal cancer: a study based on preoperative CT intratumoral and peritumoral radiomics features,” Front. Oncol., vol. Volume 15-2025, 2025, doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1662354.

A. Z. Paredes et al., “A novel machine-learning approach to predict recurrence after resection of colorectal liver metastases,” Ann. Surg. Oncol., vol. 27, no. 13, pp. 5139–5147, 2020, doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-08991-9.

Y. Huang, W. Li, F. Macheret, R. A. Gabriel, and L. Ohno-Machado, “A tutorial on calibration measurements and calibration models for clinical prediction models,” Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 621–633, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocz228.

F. M. Ojeda et al., “Calibrating machine learning approaches for probability estimation: A comprehensive comparison,” Stat. Med., vol. 42, no. 29, pp. 5451–5478, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.1002/sim.9921.

S. Buzdugan, M. Mazher, and D. Puig, “Radiogenomics for Glioblastoma Survival Prediction: Integrating Radiomics, Clinical, and Genomic Features Using Artificial Intelligence,” Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s10278-025-01692-3.

X. Li et al., “Machine learning for grading prediction and survival analysis in high grade glioma,” Sci. Rep., vol. 15, no. 1, p. 16955, 2025, doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-01413-4.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24014/ijaidm.v9i1.39071

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Office and Secretariat:

Big Data Research Centre
Puzzle Research Data Technology (Predatech)
Laboratory Building 1st Floor of Faculty of Science and Technology
UIN Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau

Jl. HR. Soebrantas KM. 18.5 No. 155 Pekanbaru Riau – 28293
Website: http://predatech.uin-suska.ac.id/ijaidm
Email: ijaidm@uin-suska.ac.id
e-Journal: http://ejournal.uin-suska.ac.id/index.php/ijaidm
Phone: 085275359942

Click Here for Information


Journal Indexing:

Google Scholar | ROAD | PKP Index | BASE | ESJI | General Impact Factor | Garuda | Moraref | One Search | Cite Factor | Crossref | WorldCat | Neliti  | SINTA | Dimensions | ICI Index Copernicus 

IJAIDM Stats