AI-Based Prediction of Fatalities in Flight Accidents: Insights from 75 Years of Aviation Accident Records

Muhammad Ridho Ramadhan, Avelia Fairuz Faadhilah, Roniyansyah Roniyansyah, Elmo Juanara

Abstract


Aviation accidents have reached a plateau in safety improvements since the late 1990s, emphasizing the need for advanced analytical approaches. This study utilizes a data-driven framework with Artificial Intelligence (AI) on a comprehensive dataset encompassing 75 years of global aviation accidents. This allows identification of long-term safety patterns often overlooked in studies restricted to specific regions or flight phases. The study aims to analyze long-term trends and predict future aviation accidents using Machine Learning (ML) classification models. This study involved web scraping Aviation Safety Network (ASN) database to compile the dataset, followed by Exploratory Data Analysis (EDA) to obtain insights. Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest (RF), and Categorical Naive Bayes were employed for fatality prediction. EDA results show while the number of fatal accidents has declined, scheduled passenger service and En route flight phase show the highest occurrences proportionally. Furthermore, the maneuvering flight phase and military service have maximum likelihood of a fatal outcome. The predictive models achieved accuracies of approximately 79-80%. The SVM model, with the highest F1-score (79.85%), proved to be the most balanced in terms of specificity for non-fatal incidents and sensitivity for fatal ones. This result provides safety practitioners with a reliable framework for evidence-based decision making. 


Keywords


Aircraft Accidents; Aviation Safety; Exploratory Data Analysis; Fatality Prediction; Machine Learning

Full Text:

PDF

References


The Boeing Company, “Statistical Summary of Commercial Jet Airplane Accidents: Worldwide Operations 1959-2023,” 2024, Accessed: Mar. 09, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.boeing.com/content/dam/boeing/boeingdotcom/company/about_bca/pdf/statsum.pdf.

T. T. R. Koo, C. Caponecchia, and A. Williamson, “Measuring the effect of aviation safety risk reduction on flight choice in young travellers,” Saf Sci, vol. 73, pp. 1–7, Mar. 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2014.10.008.

M. Rey, D. Aloise, F. Soumis, and R. Pieugueu, “A data-driven model for safety risk identification from flight data analysis,” Transportation Engineering, vol. 5, p. 100087, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.treng.2021.100087.

S. Athmaja, M. Hanumanthappa, and V. Kavitha, “A survey of ML algorithms for big data analytics,” in 2017 International Conference on Innovations in Information, Embedded and Communication Systems (ICIIECS), IEEE, Mar. 2017, pp. 1–4. doi: 10.1109/ICIIECS.2017.8276028.

G. Demir, S. Moslem, and S. Duleba, “Artificial Intelligence in Aviation Safety: Systematic Review and Biometric Analysis,” International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, vol. 17, no. 1, p. 279, Nov. 2024, doi: 10.1007/s44196-024-00671-w.

H. Zhang and S. Mahadevan, “Ensemble ML models for aviation incident risk prediction,” Reliab Eng Syst Saf, vol. 186, pp. 35–45, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2018.11.011.

F. Omrani, H. Etemadfard, and R. Shad, “Assessment of aviation accident datasets in severity prediction through ML,” J Air Transp Manag, vol. 115, p. 102531, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2023.102531.

K. Bilgic, T. K. Dasaklis, and Y. M. G. Costa, “Prediction of injuries and fatalities in aviation accidents,” in Proceedings of the 2017 ACM International Conference on Computing Frontiers (CF’17), Siena, Italy, May 2017, pp. 299–304. doi: 10.1145/3093241.3093288.

T. Xia, H. Li, Y. Zhang, and H. Chen, “ML-based anomaly detection and prediction in commercial aviation,” PLoS One, vol. 20, no. 8, p. e0317914, Aug. 2025, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317914.

International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), “Annex 13 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation: Aircraft Accident and Incident Investigation. ,” Montreal, Canada, 2020.

K. B. Marais and M. R. Robichaud, “Analysis of trends in aviation maintenance risk: An empirical approach,” Reliab Eng Syst Saf, vol. 106, pp. 104–118, Oct. 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2012.06.003.

J. Clare and K. I. Kourousis, “Learning from Incidents in Aircraft Maintenance and Continuing Airworthiness Management: A Systematic Review,” J Adv Transp, vol. 2021, pp. 1–13, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.1155/2021/8852932.

E. Juanara and C. Y. Lam, “Classification of Non-Seismic Tsunami Early Warning Level Using Decision Tree Algorithm,” Journal of Information Systems Engineering and Business Intelligence, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 378–391, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.20473/jisebi.10.3.378-391.

H. Ranter and F. I. Lujan, “Aviation Safety Network.” Accessed: Mar. 27, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://aviation-safety.net/about/

A. Abodayeh, R. Hejazi, W. Najjar, L. Shihadeh, and R. Latif, “Web Scraping for Data Analytics: A BeautifulSoup Implementation,” in 2023 Sixth International Conference of Women in Data Science at Prince Sultan University (WiDS PSU), IEEE, Mar. 2023, pp. 65–69. doi: 10.1109/WiDS-PSU57071.2023.00025.

F. B. Hermawan, T. E. Sutanto, and A. Santoso, “Exploratory Data Analysis of Indonesian Presidential Election Candidate Campaign in 2019 on Twitter,” Indonesian Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Data Mining, vol. 7, no. 2, p. 229, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.24014/ijaidm.v7i2.26308.

Y. Guo, Y. Sun, Y. He, F. Du, S. Su, and C. Peng, “Deep-Learning-Based Model for Accident-Type Prediction During Approach and Landing,” IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 472–482, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.1109/TAES.2022.3184282.

D. Mustafa Abdullah and A. Mohsin Abdulazeez, “ML Applications based on SVM Classification A Review,” Qubahan Academic Journal, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 81–90, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.48161/qaj.v1n2a50.

H. Aygun, O. O. Dursun, K. Dönmez, O. Sahin, and S. Toraman, “Prediction of performance characteristics of an experimental micro turbojet engine using ML approaches,” Energy, vol. 313, p. 133997, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2024.133997.

L. Yang et al., “Study of cardiovascular disease prediction model based on random forest in eastern China,” Sci Rep, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 5245, Mar. 2020, doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-62133-5.

M. Schonlau and R. Y. Zou, “The random forest algorithm for statistical learning,” The Stata Journal: Promoting communications on statistics and Stata, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 3–29, Mar. 2020, doi: 10.1177/1536867X20909688.

S. Nieland, R. Oostendorp, M. Heinrichs, and R. Cyganski, “Transferability analysis of user groups in travel behavior surveys using a random forest classification model,” Transportation Research Procedia, vol. 76, pp. 81–95, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.trpro.2023.12.040.

O. Peretz, M. Koren, and O. Koren, “Naive Bayes classifier – An ensemble procedure for recall and precision enrichment,” Eng Appl Artif Intell, vol. 136, p. 108972, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.engappai.2024.108972.

F. H. M. Gandadipoera, R. Andrian, and R. Safei, “Tree Damage Type Classification Based on Forest Health Monitoring Using Mobile-Based Convolutional Neural Network,” Indonesian Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Data Mining, vol. 7, no. 2, p. 299, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.24014/ijaidm.v7i2.29421.

Airbus, “A Statistical Analysis of Commercial Aviation Accidents 1958-2023,” Blagnac, France, 2024.

E. A. Okine, E. Zarei, and B. J. Roggow, “Exploring the intellectual insights in aviation safety research: A systematic literature and bibliometric review,” Saf Sci, vol. 170, p. 106354, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2023.106354.

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), “Air Traffic by The Numbers,” Washington D.C. , United States., 2024.

H. S. Eneterio, M. F. F. Ricco, and N. G. da Paixão Eneterio, “Risk management in military operations: An application of the Mosler method,” Journal of the Americas, vol. 2, pp. 226–239, 2020.

E. Juanara and C. Y. Lam, “Deep learning-based waveform forecasting and physical simulations for volcano collapse tsunami early warning: The Anak Krakatau case,” Ocean Engineering, vol. 335, p. 121683, Aug. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2025.121683.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24014/ijaidm.v8i3.37948

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Office and Secretariat:

Big Data Research Centre
Puzzle Research Data Technology (Predatech)
Laboratory Building 1st Floor of Faculty of Science and Technology
UIN Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau

Jl. HR. Soebrantas KM. 18.5 No. 155 Pekanbaru Riau – 28293
Website: http://predatech.uin-suska.ac.id/ijaidm
Email: ijaidm@uin-suska.ac.id
e-Journal: http://ejournal.uin-suska.ac.id/index.php/ijaidm
Phone: 085275359942

Click Here for Information


Journal Indexing:

Google Scholar | ROAD | PKP Index | BASE | ESJI | General Impact Factor | Garuda | Moraref | One Search | Cite Factor | Crossref | WorldCat | Neliti  | SINTA | Dimensions | ICI Index Copernicus 

IJAIDM Stats