Nilai Lingkungan dan Sikap Ramah Lingkungan Pada Warga Jakarta Di Pemukiman Kumuh

Gumgum Gumelar

Abstract


Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui perbedaan nilai lingkungan dan sikap ramah lingkungan di Jakarta yang ada di pemukiman kumuh. Penelitian ini dilakukan kepada 196 subjek penelitian yang bermukim di daerah kumuh (slum area) di Jakarta dengan menggunakan Metode pendekatan kuantitatif dengan metode survey dan menggunakan uji analisis statistik dengan chi-square untuk mengetahui bagaimana perbedaan frekuensi nilai lingkungan dan sikap ramah lingkungan serta hubungan diantara kedua variabel tersebut. Dari hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terdapat perbedaan frekuensi berdasarkan nilai lingkungan ekosentrik,antroposentrik, dan apatis yang signifikan dengan sikap ramah lingkungan positif dan negatif. Yang berarti bahwa nilai-nilai (value) lingkungan memberikan perbedaan dalam sikap masyarakat kumuh jakarta terhadap sikap ramah lingkungan. Kata kunci: nilai lingkungan, sikap ramah lingkungan, pemukiman kumuh

References


Azwar, S. (2018). Penyusunan Skala

Psikologi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Azwar, S. (2013). Sikap Manusia: Teori dan

Pengukurannya. Yogyakarta: Pustaka

Pelajar.

Corraliza, A, J., & J. B. (2000). Environmental,

Values, Beliefs, And Actions A

Situasional Approach. Environment

and Behavior, 23 No. 6, 832-848.

Cooper, David Edward, & Joy Palmer,(1998)

Spirit of the environment: religion,

value, and environmental concern.

Psychology Press,

Dunlop, R E & Van Liere K D. (1978). The

“New Environmental Paradigm”: A

Proposed Instrument and Preliminary

Results. Journal of Environmental

Education (1): 10-19.

Dunlap, R. E., Van Liere, K. D., Mertig, A. G.,

& Jones, R. E. (2000). New trends

in measuring environmental attitudes:

measuring endorsement of the new

ecological paradigm: a revised NEP

scale. Journal of social issues, 56(3),

-442.

Ebreo, Angela, Vinning, J., & Christancho,

S. (2003). Responsibility For Environ-

mental Problems And The Conse-

quences Of Waste Reduction: A Test

Of The Norm-Activation Model. J.

Environmental Systems, 29.

Fitkau, H.-J. & Kessel, H. (1981)

Umweltlernen: Veraenderungsmoeg-

lichkeite n des Umweltbewusstseins.

Modell-Erfahrungen (Koenigstein,

Hain).

Hardie, I., & Nickerson, C. (2003). The effect

of a forest conservation regulation on

the value of subdivisions in Maryland

(No. 28575).

Heberlein, T. A. (2012). Navigating environ-

mental attitudes. Oxford University

Press.

Heimstra, & Farling, M. (1974). Environmental

Psychology. California: Wadsworth

Publishing Company.

Hofstede, G., & Bond, M. H. (1984).

Hofstede’s culture dimensions an

independent validation using rokeach’s value survey. Journal of

cross-cultural psychology, 15 (4), 417-

Inglehart, R. (1977). Long term trends in mass

support for European unification.

Government and Opposition, 12(02),

-177.

Karp, D. Guternez. (1996). Values And Their

Effect On Pro Environmental

Behavior. Environment and Behavior,

, 111-133.

Katz, E.,& Oechsli, L., (1993). Moving Beyond

Anttropocentrism: Environmental

Ethics, Development, And The

Amazon, Environmental Ethics,

Vol. 15, Spring, 49-59. .

Kollmuss, A. & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the

Gap: Why do people act environmen-

tally and what are the barriers to

pro-environmental behavior, Environ-

mental Education Research, 8: 3,

– 260.

Kotchen, M. J., & Reiling, S. D. (2000).

Environmental attitudes, motivations,

and contingent valuation of nonuse

values: a case study involving

endangered species. Ecological

Economics, 32(1), 93-107.

Poortinga, W., Steg, L., & Vlek, C. (2004).

Values, environmental concern, and

environmental behavior a study

into household energy use. Environ-

ment and behavior, 36(1), 70-93.

Rummel, R. J. (1975). The dynamic psychological field. In: Understanding

conflict and war (Vol. 1). Thousand

Oaks, CA: Sage.

Samarasinghe, V. (2012). Female sex

trafficking in Asia: The resilience of

patriarchy in a changing world.

Routledge.

Secord, P. F., & Backman, C. W. (1964).

An interpersonal approach to

personality. Progress in experimental

personality research, 2, 91-125.

Shrivastava, Paul (1995), “Environ-

mental Technologies and Competitive

Advantage,”Strategic Management

Journal, v.16, 183-200.

Soyez, K. (2012). How National Culture Value

Affect Pro-environmental Behavior.

Proenvironmental consumer behavior

International Marketing , 29, 623-646.

Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., & Kalof, L. (1993). Value

orientations, gender, and environ-

mental concern. Environment and

behavior, 25(5), 322-348.

Schwartz, S.H. (1977) Normative inuences

on altruism, in: L. BERKOWITZ (Ed.)

Advances in Experimental Social

Psychology, Vol. 10 (New York,

Academic Press).

Thompson, S. C. G., & Barton, M. A.

(1994). Ecocentric and anthropocentric

attitudes toward the environment.

Journal of environmental

Psychology, 14(2), 149-157.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


REDAKSI : JURNAL PSIKOLOGI

Jl. H.R. Soebrantas Km. 15.5 No. 155 Gedung Fakultas Psikologi UIN Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau Kel. Simpang Baru Kec. Tampan Pekanbaru - Riau 28293 HP. 081378063164

E-mail : jurnal.psikologi@uin-suska.ac.id

Lisensi Creative Commons

Jurnal Psikologi oleh Fakultas Psikologi disebarluaskan di bawah Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi 4.0 Internasional.