Pengaruh Regulasi Perilaku Islami dan Kesadaran Moral terhadap Kemunafikan

Agus Abdul Rahman

Abstract


Kemunafikan merupakan masalah serius dalam pendidikan moral. Berbagai penelitian sudah dilakukan untuk memahami karakter kemunafikan tersebut, dan faktor-faktor apa yang mempengaruhinya. Pemahaman itu penting agar dapat dilakukan upaya antisipatif untuk mengatasinya. Penelitian yang sudah dilakukan lebih fokus pada bagaimana aspek-aspek kognitif dan afektif berpengaruh terhadap kemunafikan, sedangkan aspek perilaku kurang mendapatkan perhatian. Penelitian ini menguji pengaruh Regulasi Perilaku Islami terhadap Kesadaran Moral dan Kemunafikan. Menarik untuk dibahas karena Islam secara detil mengatur bagaimana  pemeluknya harus berperilaku. Pengaturan perilaku secara detil tersebut diduga akan meningkatkan kesadaran terhadap nilai-nilai moral, dan kesadaran moral sendiri secara empiric sudah terbukti dapat menurunkan kemunafikan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Regulasi Perilaku Islami secara signifikan berhubungan positif dengan  Kesadaran Moral  (r = .152, p = .021), dan berhubungan negative dengan kemunafikan (r = -.205, p = .002). Regulasi Perilaku Islami dan Kesadaran Moral secara bersama-sama juga berpengaruh secara signifikan terhadap kemunafikan, F (2, 225) = 7.237, p = .001, dengan nilai R2 sebesar .052. Hasil penelitian lainnya menunjukkan bahwa kesadaran terhadap domain moral kesucian dapat menurunkan kemunafikan ( β = -1.182, p = .008), sedangkan kesadaran terhadap domain moral lainnya tidak berpengaruh.


References


Al Ghazali (1998). Menjelang Hidayah : Mukadimah Ihya Ulumuddin. (Penj. As’ad El-Hafidy). Bandung. Penerbit Mizan.

Al Ghazali (2008). Menguak Rahasia Qolbu (Mukasyafatul Qulub). (Penj. Aahrun Abubakar). Bandung. Nuansa Aulia.

Asai, Tomohisa dan Tanno, Yoshiki (2007) The relationship between the sense of self-agency and schizotypal personality traits. Journal of Motor Behavior. Vol 39(3), May 2007, 162-168

Batson, C. D., Thompson, E. R., & Chen, H. (2002) Moral hypocrisy: Addressing some alternatives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 330–339.

Clark-Carter, D. (2004). Quantitative Psychological Research : A Student’s Handbook. USA and Canada. Psychology Press

Gallagher, S. (2000). Philosophical conception of the self : implication for cognitive science. Trend in Cognitive Sciences. 4, 14-21

Haidt, J. (2001). The Emotional Dog and Its Rational Tail: A Social Intuitionist Approach to Moral Judgment. Psychological Review, 2001. Vol. 108. No. 4, 814-834

Haidt, J., & Graham, J. (2007). When morality opposes justice: Conservatives have moral intuitions that liberals may not recognize. Social Justice Research, 20, 98–116.

Haidt, Roller, dan Dias (1993). Affect, Culture, and Morality, or Is It Wrong to Eat bur Dog? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1993, Vol. 65, No. 4, 613-628

Haidt, J., Graham, J., & Nosek, B.A. (2009). Liberals and Conservatives Rely on Different Sets of Moral Foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2009, Vol. 96, No. 5, 1029–1046

Haidt, J., P. Rozin, C. McCauley, and S. Imada. 1997. “Body, Psyche, and Culture: The Relationship between Disgust and Morality.” Psychology and Developing Societies 9:107–31.

Halstead, J.M. (2007) Islamic values: a distinctive framework for moral education? Journal of Moral Education Vol. 36, No. 3, September 2007, pp. 283–296

Horberg EJ, Oveis C, Keltner D, dan Cohen AB ( 2009). Disgust and the Moralization of Purity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2009, Vol. 97, No. 6, 963–976

Lapsley, D.K. (2006). Moral Stage Theory. In Klillen, M. and Smetana, J.G. (Ed.). Hanbook of Moral Development. New Jersey London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers

Looy H, (2004). Embodied and Embedded Morality : Divinity, Identity, and disgust. Zygon, vol. 39, no. 1 (March 2004).

Jeannerod, M. (2003).The mechanism of self-recognition in humans. Behavioural Brain Research 142 (2003) 1–15

Kuiper, Nicholas A dan Borowicz-Sibenik, Melanie (2005) A good sense of humor doesn't always help: Agency and communion as moderators of psychological well-being. Personality and Individual Differences. Vol 38(2), Jan 2005, 365-377

Miller, J.G. (2007). Cultural Psychology of Moral Development. In Kitayama, S. & Cohen, D. (Ed.). Handbook of Cultural Psychology. New York. London. The Guilford Press

Naso, R.C (2006). Immoral Actions In Othersiwe Moral Individuals : Interrogating the Structure and Meaning of Moral Hypocrisy. Psychoanalytic Psychology 2006, Vol. 23, No. 3, 475–489

Reynolds, S.J. (2006). Moral Awareness and Ethical Predispositions : Investigating the Role of Individual Differences in the Recognition of Moral Issues. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2006. Vol. 91 No. 1. 233-243

Smetana, J.G (2006). Social-Cognitive Domain Theory : Consistencies and Variations in Children’s Moral and Social Judgments. In Klillen, M. and Smetana, J.G. (Ed.). Hanbook of Moral Development. New Jersey London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

Tybur, J.M, Lieberman, D., & Griskevicius, V. (2009). Microbes, Mating, and Morality: Individual Differences in Three Functional Domains of Disgust. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2009, Vol. 97, No. 1, 103–122

Turiel, E. (2008). Thought about actions in social domains: Morality, social conventions, and social interactions. Cognitive Development (2008) 136–154

Turiel, E. (2006). Thought, Emotions, and Social Interactional Processes in Moral Development. In Klillen, M. and Smetana, J.G. (Ed.). Hanbook of Moral Development. New Jersey London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

Walker, L.J. (2006). Gender and Morality. In Klillen, M. and Smetana, J.G. (Ed.). Hanbook of Moral Development. New Jersey London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

Watson, G.W. & Sheikh, F. (2007) Normative Self-Interest or Moral Hypocrisy?: The Importance of Context. Journal of Business Ethics (2008) 77:259–269




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24014/jp.v13i1.3092

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


REDAKSI : JURNAL PSIKOLOGI

Jl. H.R. Soebrantas Km. 15.5 No. 155 Gedung Fakultas Psikologi UIN Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau Kel. Tuahmadani Kec. Tampan Pekanbaru - Riau 28293. 

E-mail : jurnal.psikologi@uin-suska.ac.id / Website : http://ejournal.uin-suska.ac.id/index.php/psikologi

 

 

Lisensi Creative Commons


Jurnal Psikologi oleh Fakultas Psikologi disebarluaskan di bawah Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi 4.0 Internasional.