BETWEEN RECOGNITION AND EXCLUSION: Indigenous Peoples’ Rights in Asia's Development Policies
Abstract
This article critically examines the paradox of legal recognition and structural exclusion of indigenous peoples in Asia, with a focus on the Philippines, Nepal, and Indonesia. While many Asian states have adopted progressive legal instruments to recognize indigenous rights—often aligning with international standards such as ILO Convention No. 169 and UNDRIP—implementation remains fragmented, conditional, and subordinate to dominant development paradigms. Drawing on a critical policy analysis of legal texts, governance frameworks, and regional case studies, the paper argues that recognition, in the absence of structural transformation, functions as a tool of managed inclusion that obscures ongoing dispossession. Development policies driven by extractive economies, centralized authority, and technocratic rationalities continue to marginalize indigenous territories and knowledge systems. The article calls for a reconfiguration of recognition as a decolonial and rights-based practice that centers indigenous sovereignty, co-governance, and epistemic justice in shaping inclusive futures.
Keywords
References
Errico, S. (2017). The rights of indigenous peoples in Asia: A human rights-based overview of national legal and policy frameworks against the backdrop of country strategies for development and poverty reduction. Geneva: International Labour Organization.
Escobar, A. (1995). Encountering development: The making and unmaking of the Third World. Princeton University Press.
Ferguson, J. (1994). The anti-politics machine: "Development," depoliticization, and bureaucratic power in Lesotho. University of Minnesota Press.
ILO. (1989). Indigenous and Tribal Peoples Convention, 1989 (No. 169). Geneva: International Labour Organization. https://www.ilo.org
ILO. (2008). Promotion of indigenous peoples' rights: ILO Convention No. 169. Geneva: International Labour Organization.
Merry, S. E. (2006). Human rights and gender violence: Translating international law into local justice. University of Chicago Press.
United Nations. (2007). United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP). https://www.un.org/development/desa/indigenouspeoples/declaration-on-the-rights-of-indigenous-peoples.html
United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda
Santos, B. de S. (2002). Toward a new legal common sense: Law, globalization, and emancipation (2nd ed.). Butterworths.
Tamang, M. (2005). Legal empowerment of indigenous peoples: The Nepal experience. International Labour Organization. https://www.ilo.org/global/topics/indigenous-tribal/WCMS_100809/lang--en/index.htm
Colchester, M. (2010). Free, prior and informed consent: Making FPIC work for forests and peoples. Forest Peoples Programme.
Lindroth, M., & Sinevaara-Niskanen, H. (2013). The differing conceptions of indigeneity and their implications in global governance. The International Journal of Human Rights, 17(1), 72–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2012.695202
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24014/apjrs.v8i2.37572
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 Asia-Pacific Journal on Religion and Society
Asia-Pacific Journal on Religion and Society (APJRS) Indexed By:
Mailing Address:
Nusantara Journal for Southeast Asian Islamic Studies is published by Institute for Southeast Asian Islamic Studies (ISAIS) Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau.
Gedung Islamic Center Lt. I Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau, Jl. H.R. Soebrantas Km. 15 No. 155 Kelurahan Simpang Baru Kecamatan Tampan Pekanbaru - Riau 28293, PO. BOX 1004.
Published by:
Indexed by:
APJRS is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International.