Sensitifitas Multi-Atribute Decision Making Group dalam Pengambilan Keputusan pada Kasus Scoring Wilayah di Riau

Mustakim Mustakim

Abstract


Education becomes a develop the potential of human resources in an area. Various the award will be given to areas that have the best potential related for education. The determination and scoring by relevant agencies to seek the best alternative from a set of alternatives. The concept of the group Multi-attribute Decision Making (MADM) applied in decision making method Simple Aditive Weighting (SAW), Weighting Product (WP), Tecnique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) and the method of paired comparisons Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). A decision that produced a scoring area was chosen based on the calculation and analysis methods used the results of each method and the results of the hybrid method. In this research, there are three alternatives chosen, namely the A11, A6 and A8 for each respective method and incorporation method. Decision makers set a hybrid method as the final results used a reference for decision making by the percentage values are respectively 17.64%, 14.39% and 13.08%.
Keywords: Analytic Hierarchy Process, Multi-attribute Decision Making, Simple aditive weighting, Scoring, weighting Product

Full Text:

PDF

References


Afshari, Alireza, Majid Mojahed, Rosnah Mohd Yusuff, 2010, Simple Additive Weighting approach to Personnel Selection problem, International Journal of Innovation, Management and Technology. 1(5): 511-515.

BPS Provinsi Riau, 2012, Riau dalam Angka 2012

Hulukati, Wenny, 2011, Pengembangan Model Bahan Belajar Mandiri Berbasis Andragogi untuk Meningka Tkan Kompetensi Pendidik Anak Usia Dini, Jurnal Penelitian dan Pendidikan, Volume 8 Nomor 1

Isharwati, 2009, Model Inklusif Layanan Khusus Pembinaan Siswa Cerdas Istimewa/ Berbakat Berbasis Sumber Daya Daerah. Jurnal Pendidikan Khusus Vol. 5 No. 2.

Kumar, D. Sameer, S. Radhika and K. N. S.Suman, 2013, MADM Methods for Finding The Right Personnel in Academic Institutions, International Journal of u- and e- Service, Science and Technology Vol.6, No.5, pp.133-144.

Kusumadewi, Sri and Sri Hartati, 2007, Utilizing Fuzzy Multi-Attribute Decision Makingfor Group Clinical Decision Making Model. ICSIIT.

Kusumadewi, Sri and Sri Hartati, 2012, Sensitivity Analysis of Multi-Attribute Decision Making Methods in Clinical Group Decision Support System, Interational Conference Informatics Department, Indonesia Islamic University Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Kusumadewi, Sri, Sri Hartati, Agus Harjoko, Retantyo Wardoyo, 2006, Fuzzy Multi-Attribute Decision Making (Fuzzy MADM), Jogjakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Kusumadewi, Sri and Sri Hartati, 2011, Sensitivity Analysis of Multi-Attribute Decision Making Methods in Clinical Group Decision Support System, Interational Conference Informatics Department, Indonesia Islamic University Yogyakarta, Indonesia.

Marimin, 2005, Teknik dan Aplikasi Pengambilan Keputusan Kriteria Majemuk. Jakarta: Grasindo.

Saaty, Thomas L, 2008, Decision making with the Analytic Hierarchy Process. International Journal Services Sciences, Vol. 1, No. 1.

Wang, Tien-Chin, 2007, A Fuzzy TOPSIS Approach with Subjective Weights and Objective Weights, Proceedings of the 6th WSEAS International Conference on Applied Computer Science, Hangzhou, China

Mustakim, Darianto W. 2013. Perancangan Aplikasi Perangkingan Penerima Beasiswa Menggunakan Metode Technique For Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) (Studi Kasus SMK Dar El Hikmah Pekanbaru). Seminar Nasional Teknologi Informasi, Komunikasi dan Industri (SNTIKI) 5: 112-122. ISSN : 2085-9902 Pekanbaru, 2 Oktober 2013.

Mustakim, Buono A, Hermadi I, 2015, Decission Scoring Determining of Development Renewable Energy Center Based Region Cluster with SAWP Method, Jurnal Teknologi Industri Pertanian IPB, Volume 25 Edisi Juni 2015

Jahanshahloo GR, Lotfi MH, Izadikhah M. 2006. An algorithmic method to extend TOPSIS for decision-making problems with interval data. International Journal Applied Mathematics and Computation 175 (2006) 1375–1384.

MemarianiA, Amini A dan Alinezhad A. 2009. Sensitivity Analysis of Simple Additive Weighting Method (SAW): The Results of Change in the Weight of One Attribute on the Final Ranking of Alternatives. Journal of Industrial Engineering 4 (2009): 13- 18.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


FAKULTAS SAINS DAN TEKNOLOGI
UIN SUSKA RIAU
Kampus Raja Ali Haji
Gedung Fakultas Sains & Teknologi UIN Suska Riau
Jl.H.R.Soebrantas No.155 KM 18 Simpang Baru Panam, Pekanbaru 28293
Email: sntiki@uin-suska.ac.id