Model Evaluasi Kinerja Pemasok PT XYZ dengan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process

Triwulandari S. Dewayana, Wahyu S. Dani

Abstract


The results of the analysis of supplier performance evaluation model PT XYZ show that the
model has the disadvantage of only using two evaluation criteria and performed separately. The weakness
was led to the management of PT XYZ has a problems in taking decisions related to the performance of
suppliers. This research aims to design supplier performance evaluation model that is expected to improve
efficiency and effectiveness in implementation. The method used is Analytical Hierarchy Process.
Structure hierarchical model consists of four levels, namely objectives, criteria, sub-criteria and
alternatives. The proportion namely Quality (46%), Delivery (24%), Cost (8%), Response (22%), PACS
(45%), warranty Claim (11%), Quality Audit System (44%), kipping, stop line, stop variant (100%), Cost
down (100%), the response PACS (44%), the response FTIR (7%), the response Finding Audit (38%), and
the response kipping, stop line, stop variants (11 %). Verify the model shows that the model produces a
value corresponding predetermined assessment standards and can be implemented. Validation of the
model showed that the contents include the evaluation required by the customer; evaluation can be
conducted objectively; and sufficiently improve the efficiency and effectiveness in implementation.
Keywords: Analytical Hierarchy Process, model, performance evaluation, supplier


Full Text:

PDF

References


Putri, Chauliah Fatma. 2012. Pemilihan Supplier Bahan Baku Kertas Dengan Model Qcdfr dan

Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). Journal. Widya Teknika Vol.20 No.2. Diakes tanggal 17

November 2013 dari http: // widyagama.ac.id / ejournal/ index.php/ widyateknika /article/view/94/82

Hald, Kim Sundtoft. 2011. Supplier Evaluation Processes: the shaping and reshaping of supplier

performance. International Journal of Operation & Production Management Vol.31 No.8, pp.888-

Diakses tanggal 01 November 2014 dari http :// emeraldinsight.com / doi / pdfplus/

1108/01443571111153085

Gallego, Laura Virseda. 2011. Review of Existing Methods, Models, and tools for Supplier

Evaluation. Institute of Technology.

Dickson, “An analysis of vendor selection: systems and decisions”, Journal of purchasing, 1 ( 2),

pp. 5-17.

Bogdanoff, Mikael Johannes. 2009. Supplier Evaluation Using Analytical Hierarchy Process.

Thesis. Lappeenranta University of Technology. Di akses tanggal 24 Oktober 2013 dari

http://www.doria.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/44646/nbnfi-fe200903191246.pdf?sequence=3

Vaidya, Omkarprasad, Manoj Hudnurkar. 2013. “Multi-Criteria Supply Chain Performance

Evaluation an Indian Chemical Industry Case Study”. International Journal of Productivity and

Performance Management Vol 62 No 23, pp 293-316. Diakses tanggal 01 November 2014 dari

http://emeraldinsight.com/doi/pdfplus/10.1108/17410401311309195

Muralidharan, C., Anantharaman, N., Deshmukh, S.G.2002. A multi-criteria group decision-making

model for supplier rating, Journal of Supply Chain Management, 38 (4), pp. 22-33.

Kasperczyk, N. and Knickel, K. “The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)”.

Khurrum S. Bhutta and Faizul Huq.2002. Supplier selection problem: a comparison of the total cost

of ownership and analytic hierarchy process approaches, Supply Chain Management: An

International Journal, 7 (3), pp. 129-135.

Jenab, Kouroush, Hamid Pourmohammdi, & Matin Sarfaraz. 2014. An i-AHP & QFD Warranty

Model. Benchmarking: An International Journal Vol. 21 No. 7, pp.884-902. Diakses tanggal 01

November 2014 dari http://emeraldinsight.com/doi/pdfplus/10.1108/BIJ-01-2013-0017


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


FAKULTAS SAINS DAN TEKNOLOGI
UIN SUSKA RIAU

Kampus Raja Ali Haji
Gedung Fakultas Sains & Teknologi UIN Suska Riau
Jl.H.R.Soebrantas No.155 KM 18 Simpang Baru Panam, Pekanbaru 28293
Email: sntiki@uin-suska.ac.id