Modifikasi dan Validitas Adaptive Performance Scale (APS) Pegawai Gen Z
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24014/pib.v7i2.39390Keywords:
Adaptive performance, Alat ukur adaptive performance, reliabilitas validitasAbstract
Adaptive performance merupakan kemampuan individu dalam mengubah perilaku guna memenuhi tuntutan lingkungan yang baru. Di tengah dominasi angkatan kerja global Gene Z, belum terdapat instrumen adaptive performance yang secara spesifik divalidasi untuk memotret karakteristik generasi tersebut, sehingga memunculkan kesenjangan literatur. Penelitian ini bertujuan mengkaji kelayakan psikometrik dari modifikasi skala adaptive performance agar relevan dengan konteks pegawai Gen Z. Pendekatan ilmiah dilakukan melalui lima tahapan sistematis: (1) pemilihan atribut psikologis alat ukur, (2) penyusunan spesifikasi alat ukur, (3) penyusunan draft alat ukur, (4) review butir, (5) uji coba lapangan dan validitas-reliabilitas. Berdasarkan pengujian terhadap 121 partisipan, hasil penelitian mengonfirmasi bahwa instrumen ini sangat valid dan reliabel. Validitas isi menunjukkan tingkat kesepakatan pakar yang sangat tinggi terhadap relevansi butir. Selain itu, pengujian validitas konstruk melalui analisis faktor konfirmatori membuktikan bahwa struktur lima dimensi pada alat ukur ini memiliki tingkat kecocokan model empiris yang sangat baik. Seluruh dimensi juga menunjukkan tingkat konsistensi internal dan reliabilitas komposit yang memuaskan. Sebagai kesimpulan, modifikasi instrumen kinerja adaptif ini terbukti layak dan kokoh secara psikometrik. Temuan ini memberikan implikasi penting bagi pengembangan manajemen SDM, yakni menyediakan instrumen evaluasi yang akurat. Dengan alat ukur ini, organisasi dapat memetakan dan menstimulasi potensi adaptabilitas karyawan muda agar lebih siap dalam menghadapi tantangan era disrupsi.
References
Aiken, L.R. (1985). Three coefficients for analyzing the reliability and validityof ratings. Educational and Psychological Measurument, 45(1), 131-142. http://doi.org/10.1177/0013164485451012
Csiszárik-Kocsír, Ágnes, and Mónika Garia-Fodor. 2018. Motivation Analysing and Preference System of Choosing a Workplace as Segmentation Criteria Based on a Country Wide Research Result Focus on Generation of Z. On-Line Journal Modelling the New Europe 27, 67–85.
http://doi.org/10.24193/OJMNE.2018.27.03
Charbonnier-Voirin, A., & Roussel, P. (2012). Adaptive performance: A new scale to measure individual performance in organizations. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l'Administration, 29(3), 280–293. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjas.232
Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040957
Daffa, D. R., Arthuro, D., Fernanda, J. A., & Pratama, Muh. B. W. (2024). Gen-Z: Eksplorasi Identitas Budaya dan Tantangan Sosial Dalam Era Digital. Jurnal Insan Pendidikan Dan Sosial Humaniora. 2(2), 169–183. https://doi.org/10.59581/jipsoshum-widyakarya.v2i2.3112
Griffin, B., & Hesketh, B. (2003). Adaptable Behaviours for Successful Work and Career Adjustment. Australian Journal of Psychology, 55(2), 65–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049530412331312914
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate Data Analysis (7th ed.). Pearson Education.
Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & Kuppelwieser, V. G. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research. European Business Review, 26(2), 106–121. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-10-2013-0128
Hamdani, Sunaryo, H., & Pardiman. (2022). Analisis dampak work from home terhadap stres kerja, adaptive performance, dan kinerja pegawai. IQTISHODUNA, 18(1), 81–98. https://doi.org/10.18860/iq.v18i1.13004
Han, T. Y., & Williams K. J. (2008). Multilevel investigation of adaptive performance: Individual and team level relationships. Group & Organization Management, 33(6), 657–684. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601108326799
Katsaros, K.K. (2024). Gen Z Employee Adaptive Performance: The Role of Inclusive Leadership and Workplace Happiness. Administrative Sciences. 14 (8),163 https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci14080163
Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Publications.
Lynn, M. R. (1986). Determination and Quantification of Content Validity. Nursing Research, 35(6), 382–385. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-198611000-00017
Marques-Quinteiro, P., Vargas, R., Eifler, C. W., & Curral, L. (2019). Employee adaptive performance and job satisfaction during organizational crisis: the role of self-leadership. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 28(1), 85-100. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2018.1551882
Nandini, W., Gustomo, A., & Sushandoyo, D. (2022). The antecedents and consequences of individual adaptive performance: A systematic literature study. BISNIS & BIROKRASI: Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi dan Organisasi, 29(2), 77-89. https://doi.org/10.20476/jbb.v29i2.1271
Nurhaedah, N., Mardjuni, S.,& Saleh, H. . Y. (2018). PengaruhKemampuan Kerja dan MotivasiKerja TerhadapKinerja Karyawan PT. Air mani Tonasa Kabupaten Pangkep. Publik (Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi), 7 (1), 11. https://doi.org/10.31314/pjia.7.1.11-21.2018
Park, S., & Park, S. (2019). Employee Adaptive Performance and Its Antecedents: Review and Synthesis. Human Resource Development Review, 18(3), 294–324. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484319836315
Pichler, S., Kohli, C., & Granitz, N. (2021). DITTO for Gen Z: A framework for leveraging the uniqueness of the new generation. Business Horizons, 64(5), 599-610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2021.02.021
Schroth, H. (2019). Are you ready for Gen Z in the workplace? California Management Review, 61(3), 5-18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125619841006
Sella, S., & Riofita, H. (2024). Peran Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia dalam Mencapai Tujuan Strategies Perusahaan. Pajak dan Manajemen Keuangan, 1(5), 75-82. https://doi.org/10.61132/pajamkeu.v1i5.680
Setiawati, F. A., Widyastuti, T., & Bagaskara, R. S. (2024). Pengukuran properti psikometri. UNY Press.
Setiyadi, D., Septiarini, E., Kurniasih, N., Wijaya, A., Boyke, H., & Umadato, H. (2024). Determinants of Adaptive Performance at Individual, Team, and Organizational Levels: A Systematic Review of Empirical Studies (2011-2022). Journal of Logistics, Informatics and Service Science, 11(12), 39–70. https://doi.org/10.33168/JLISS.2024.1203
Tan, R., & Antonio, F. (2022). New insights on employee adaptive performance during the COVID-19 pandemic: Empirical evidence from Indonesia. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, 18(2), 175-206. https://doi.org/10.7341/20221826
Pulakos, E. D., Arad, S., Donovan, M. A., & Plamondon, K. E. (2000). Adaptability in the workplace: Development of a taxonomy of adaptive performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(4), 612–624. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.4.612
