Uji Validitas Pada Tes Proyeksi Gambar Berstimulus: The Doodle Test

Fadillah Fadillah, Medianta Tarigan

Abstract


Penggunaan alat ukur psikologis berbasis gambar menjadi salah satu tantangan di bidang psikologi karena masih terbatasnya penelitian akademis terkait validitas alat tersebut. Namun dalam kenyataannya, tes gambar proyektif dianggap sangat bermanfaat dalam mengungkap profil kepribadian individu. The Doodle Test merupakan alat ukur psikologi yang juga termasuk dalam tes gambar proyektif. Kebaruan dan kemudahan administrasinya membuat alat ini menarik bagi para praktisi untuk menggunakannya di lapangan. Hingga saat ini, masih sedikit penelitian terkait pengujian psikometrik The Doodle Test. Penelitian kali ini bertujuan untuk melakukan uji validitas konkuren terhadap The Doodle Test dengan melihat korelasinya dengan alat tes serupa yang sudah ada yaitu The Wartegg Zeichen Test. Sebanyak 103 hasil interpretasi kuantitatif The Doodle Test dan The Wartegg Zeichen Test dianalisis dengan menggunakan teknik korelasi product moment. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa The Doodle Test memiliki korelasi yang signifikan dengan The Wartegg Zeichen Test sehingga dapat dikatakan valid dalam mengukur aspek-aspek kepribadian sebagaimana yang diukur oleh The Wartegg Test

Full Text:

PDF

References


Apuke, O. D. (2017). Quantitative Research Methods : A Synopsis Approach. Kuwait Chapter of Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review, 6(11), 40–47. https://doi.org/10.12816/0040336

Bannigan, K., & Watson, R. (2009). Reliability and validity in a nutshell [Electronic Version]. Journal of Clinical Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.02939.x

Bateman, A., & Holmes, J. (1995). Introduction to Psychoanalysis. In Introduction to Psychoanalysis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203298398

Chee, J. D., & Queen, T. (2018). Pearson ’ s Product-Moment Correlation : Sample Analysis Pearson ’ s Running head : PEARSON ’ S PRODUCT MOMENT CORRELATION Pearson ’ s Product Moment Correlation : Sample Analysis Jennifer Chee University of Hawaii at M ā noa School of Nursing. January 2013.

Costa, R. M. (2017). Projection (Defense Mechanism). In V. Zeigler-Hill & T. K. Shackelford (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences (hal. 1–3). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_1413-1

Crisi, A., & Dentale, F. (2016). The wartegg drawing completion test: Inter-rater agreement and criterion validity of three new scoring categories. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy.

Davis, W. (1986). The Origins of Image Making. Current Anthropology. https://doi.org/10.1086/203422

Foley, J. P., & Kinget, C. M. (1953). The Drawing Completion Test: A Projective Technique for the Investigation of Personality. The American Journal of Psychology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1418982

Grønnerød, J. S., & Grønnerød, C. (2012). The Wartegg Zeichen Test: A literature overview and a meta-analysis of reliability and validity. Psychological Assessment. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026100

Kinget, G. M. (1952). The Drawing-Completion Test; A projective technique for the investigation of personality. Grune & Stratton.

McDowell, I. (2009). Measuring Health: A guide to rating scales and questionnaires. In Measuring Health: A Guide to Rating Scales and Questionnaires. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195165678.001.0001

Mcnichol, A. (1993). What do your Doodles Reveal; Take The Doodle Test with graphologist Andrea Mcnichol. Mcnichol-Nelson Graphology Institute. Inc.

Mcnichol, A., & Nelson, J. A. (1994). Handwriting Analysis : Putting It to Work for You (First Edit). McGraw-Hill Education.

Mohajan, H. K. (2017). Two Criteria for Good Measurements in Research: Validity and Reliability. Annals of Spiru Haret University. Economic Series, 17(4), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.26458/1746

Muijs, D. (2012). Introduction to Quantitative Research. In Doing Quantitative Research in Education with SPSS. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849209014.n1

Roivainen, E., & Ruuska, P. (2005). The Use of Projective Drawings to Assess Alexithymia. European Journal of Psychological Assessment. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.21.3.199

Roivanen, E. (2009). A brief history of the Wartegg Drawing test. Gestalt Theory, 31(1), 55–71.

Scanlon, M., & Mauro, J. (1992). The Lowdown on Handwriting Analysis. Psychology Today.

Schultz, D. P., & Schultz, S. E. (2001). Theories of personality (7th ed.). In Theories of personality (7th ed.).

Stoddard, D. A. (2003). A Comparison of the Emotional Indicators on the House-Tree-Person Drawings and the KineticHouse-Tree-Person Drawing. Andrews University.

Straub, D. W. (1989). Validating instruments in MIS research. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems. https://doi.org/10.2307/248922

Suhapti, R. (1989). Reliabilitas Tes Wartegg.

Taherdoost, H. (2018). Validity and Reliability of the Research Instrument; How to Test the Validation of a Questionnaire/Survey in a Research. SSRN Electronic Journal, January 2016. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3205040

Watson, B. (2008). Oodles of doodles?: doodling behaviour and its implications for understanding palaeoarts. Rock Art Research, 25(1), 35–60.

Zheng, Y., & de Jong, H. a. L. J. (2011). Establishing construct and concurrent validity of Pearson Test of English Academic. March, 1–43. http://www.pearsonpte.com/research/Documents/RN_EstablishingConstructAndConcurrentValidityOfPTEAcademic_2011.pdf




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24014/pib.v2i2.10328

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


REDAKSI : PSIKOBULETIN : BULETIN ILMIAH PSIKOLOGI

Jl. H.R. Soebrantas Km. 15.5 No. 155 Gedung Fakultas Psikologi UIN Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau Kel. Tuahmadani Kec. Tampan Pekanbaru - Riau 28293.

E-mail : psikobuletin@uin-suska.ac.id / Website :http://ejournal.uin-suska.ac.id/index.php/Psikobuletin

 

 

View My Stats 

 

Flag CounterCreative Commons License

Psikobuletin : Buletin Ilmiah Psikologi by Fakultas Psikologi is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.